Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forced orgasm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
res |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*[[Image:Symbol keep vote.svg|15px]] '''Keep''' — This seems a valid referenced article; I don't see that the nominator offers sufficient or valid reason for deletion in their nomination. [[User:WCityMike|WCityMike]] 00:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
*[[Image:Symbol keep vote.svg|15px]] '''Keep''' — This seems a valid referenced article; I don't see that the nominator offers sufficient or valid reason for deletion in their nomination. [[User:WCityMike|WCityMike]] 00:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
:: Which don't reference the stuff that makes this different from [[involuntary orgrasm]]. See [[WP:BOMBARD]]. I have the impression you haven't even read the nomination. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Merge''' with [[Orgasm]] though that article seems to be getting a bit long no other section has a main article for it, and there are only the two paragraphs that aren’t in the ''Involuntary orgasms'' section so it wouldn't add much and would seem to be consistent. --[[User:Wintonian|Wintonian]] ([[User talk:Wintonian|talk]]) 01:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Merge''' with [[Orgasm]] though that article seems to be getting a bit long no other section has a main article for it, and there are only the two paragraphs that aren’t in the ''Involuntary orgasms'' section so it wouldn't add much and would seem to be consistent. --[[User:Wintonian|Wintonian]] ([[User talk:Wintonian|talk]]) 01:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' specific sexual practice, though the literature on topics of this sort is not primarily in what we normally consider standard reliable sources. It's good there's enough here to defend the article. We need to expand these topics, not merge them. I sometimes think WP is surprisingly prudish. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 04:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' specific sexual practice, though the literature on topics of this sort is not primarily in what we normally consider standard reliable sources. It's good there's enough here to defend the article. We need to expand these topics, not merge them. I sometimes think WP is surprisingly prudish. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 04:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
** If you have references for this practice (as opposed to refs for [[involuntary orgrasm]]) please add them. [[WP:V|None]] are present in the article right now. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:30, 2 June 2010
- Forced orgasm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is term promoted by the BDSM porn industry. Most of this article is unsourced. The only sourced parts are about involuntary orgasm, which has a separate section in another article, and I don't see how it differs from the notion conveyed here. So, this article appears to be a poorly sourced WP:CFORK. Pcap ping 23:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 23:35, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Keep — This seems a valid referenced article; I don't see that the nominator offers sufficient or valid reason for deletion in their nomination. WCityMike 00:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Which don't reference the stuff that makes this different from involuntary orgrasm. See WP:BOMBARD. I have the impression you haven't even read the nomination. Pcap ping 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Merge with Orgasm though that article seems to be getting a bit long no other section has a main article for it, and there are only the two paragraphs that aren’t in the Involuntary orgasms section so it wouldn't add much and would seem to be consistent. --Wintonian (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep specific sexual practice, though the literature on topics of this sort is not primarily in what we normally consider standard reliable sources. It's good there's enough here to defend the article. We need to expand these topics, not merge them. I sometimes think WP is surprisingly prudish. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- If you have references for this practice (as opposed to refs for involuntary orgrasm) please add them. None are present in the article right now. Pcap ping 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)