Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Morass: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MovieMayhem (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' per [[User:MichaelQSchmidt/Too_Soon#Films|TOOSOON]]. This [http://www.britfilms.com/britishfilms/inprogress/ film-in-progress] currently fails [[WP:NF]].[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22A+Morass%22%2C+Vincent+van+Ommen&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8] Consider recreation if or when it can meet guideline. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 21:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per [[User:MichaelQSchmidt/Too_Soon#Films|TOOSOON]]. This [http://www.britfilms.com/britishfilms/inprogress/ film-in-progress] currently fails [[WP:NF]].[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22A+Morass%22%2C+Vincent+van+Ommen&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8] Consider recreation if or when it can meet guideline. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 21:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Falls way short of notability. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 01:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Falls way short of notability. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 01:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Agree, lack of source and falls way short of notability. --[[User:MovieMayhem|MovieMayhem]] ([[User talk:MovieMayhem|talk]]) 2 June 2010 |
|||
Revision as of 20:41, 2 June 2010
- A Morass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(No CSD reason for movies?) This nomination is based on complete lack of external sources (as well as seemingly no relevant google hits) and no indication of its importance. This doesn't ultimately read like WP:ADVERT but there seems to be no valid third-party source about this movie. The only link is from BritFilms.com, but it just lists the movie: no reviews, interviews, etc. Just a complete lack of notability. — Timneu22 · talk 16:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per TOOSOON. This film-in-progress currently fails WP:NF.[1] Consider recreation if or when it can meet guideline. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Falls way short of notability. --MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, lack of source and falls way short of notability. --MovieMayhem (talk) 2 June 2010