USS Cyclops: Difference between revisions
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
With American entry into World War I, ''Cyclops'' was commissioned on 1 May 1917, and her [[skipper]], George W. Worley, promoted to full commander (U.S. officer paygrade 5, the equivalent of lieutenant colonel in the Army, Air Force and Marines). She joined a convoy for [[Saint-Nazaire]], France in June 1917, returning to the U.S. in July. Except for a voyage to [[City of Halifax|Halifax, Nova Scotia]], she served along the east coast until 9 January 1918, when she was assigned to Naval Overseas Transportation Service. She then sailed to [[Brazil]]ian waters to fuel British ships in the south Atlantic, receiving the thanks of the [[U.S. Department of State|State Department]] and [[CINCPAC]].<ref name="cyclops-1.htm">[http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c/cyclops-1.htm USS ''Cyclops'']</ref><ref>[http://freepages.military.rootsweb.com/%7Ecacunithistories/hr_mallory.htm USS Henry R. Mallory]</ref> |
With American entry into World War I, ''Cyclops'' was commissioned on 1 May 1917, and her [[skipper]], George W. Worley, promoted to full commander (U.S. officer paygrade 5, the equivalent of lieutenant colonel in the Army, Air Force and Marines). She joined a convoy for [[Saint-Nazaire]], France in June 1917, returning to the U.S. in July. Except for a voyage to [[City of Halifax|Halifax, Nova Scotia]], she served along the east coast until 9 January 1918, when she was assigned to Naval Overseas Transportation Service. She then sailed to [[Brazil]]ian waters to fuel British ships in the south Atlantic, receiving the thanks of the [[U.S. Department of State|State Department]] and [[CINCPAC]].<ref name="cyclops-1.htm">[http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c/cyclops-1.htm USS ''Cyclops'']</ref><ref>[http://freepages.military.rootsweb.com/%7Ecacunithistories/hr_mallory.htm USS Henry R. Mallory]</ref> |
||
She put to sea from [[Rio de Janeiro]] on 16 February 1918. On 20 February, ''Cyclops'' entered [[Salvador, Bahia|Bahia]]. Two days later, she departed for [[Baltimore, Maryland]] — with no stops scheduled — carrying a load of {{convert|10800|LT|t|lk=on|abbr=on}} of [[manganese]] ore to be used in the manufacture of [[munitions]]. The ship was thought to be overloaded when she left Brazil, as her maximum capacity was {{convert|8000|LT|t|abbr=on}}.<ref name="Strange">{{cite journal|last=Reck|first=Alfred P.|date=June 1929|title=Strangest American Sea Mystery is Solved at Last|journal=Popular Science|pages=15–17|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=XSgDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA157&dq=%22new+ice+age%22&lr=&as_brr=3|accessdate=8 July 2009}} In this article, ''Amolco'' was erroneously called ''Amalco''.</ref> Before leaving port, Commander Worley had submitted a report that the starboard engine had a cracked cylinder and was not operative, a report confirmed by a survey board, which recommended, however, that ship returned to the United States.<ref name="Strange" /> She made an unscheduled stop in [[Barbados]] because the water line was over the [[Plimsoll line]], indicating an overloaded condition;<ref name="Strange" /> however investigations in Rio proved the ship had been loaded and secured properly.<ref name="bermuda-triangle.org">url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/cyclops_pg3.html</ref> ''Cyclops'' then set out for Baltimore, and was rumored to have been sighted on 9 March by the molasses tanker ''Amolco'' near Virginia,<ref name="Strange" /> but this was denied by the ''Amolco'''s captain.<ref>url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/q_a.html</ref> Additionally, because ''Cyclops'' was not due in Baltimore until March 13,<ref>url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/cyclops_pg2_.html</ref> it is highly unlikely that the ship would have been near Virginia on 9 March, as that location would have placed her only about a day from Baltimore. In any event, ''Cyclops'' never made it to Baltimore, and no wreckage of her has ever been found.<ref name="usnsh-c/cyclops.htm">[http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-c/cyclops.htm USN Ships-USS CYCLOPS (1910-1918)]</ref> Reports indicate that on 10 March, the day after the ship was rumored to have been sighted by ''Amolco'', a violent storm swept through the Virginia Cape area. While some suggest that the combination of the overloaded condition, engine trouble, and bad weather may have conspired to |
She put to sea from [[Rio de Janeiro]] on 16 February 1918. On 20 February, ''Cyclops'' entered [[Salvador, Bahia|Bahia]]. Two days later, she departed for [[Baltimore, Maryland]] — with no stops scheduled — carrying a load of {{convert|10800|LT|t|lk=on|abbr=on}} of [[manganese]] ore to be used in the manufacture of [[munitions]]. The ship was thought to be overloaded when she left Brazil, as her maximum capacity was {{convert|8000|LT|t|abbr=on}}.<ref name="Strange">{{cite journal|last=Reck|first=Alfred P.|date=June 1929|title=Strangest American Sea Mystery is Solved at Last|journal=Popular Science|pages=15–17|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=XSgDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA157&dq=%22new+ice+age%22&lr=&as_brr=3|accessdate=8 July 2009}} In this article, ''Amolco'' was erroneously called ''Amalco''.</ref> Before leaving port, Commander Worley had submitted a report that the starboard engine had a cracked cylinder and was not operative, a report confirmed by a survey board, which recommended, however, that ship returned to the United States.<ref name="Strange" /> She made an unscheduled stop in [[Barbados]] because the water line was over the [[Plimsoll line]], indicating an overloaded condition;<ref name="Strange" /> however investigations in Rio proved the ship had been loaded and secured properly.<ref name="bermuda-triangle.org">url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/cyclops_pg3.html</ref> ''Cyclops'' then set out for Baltimore, and was rumored to have been sighted on 9 March by the molasses tanker ''Amolco'' near Virginia,<ref name="Strange" /> but this was denied by the ''Amolco'''s captain.<ref>url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/q_a.html</ref> Additionally, because ''Cyclops'' was not due in Baltimore until March 13,<ref>url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/cyclops_pg2_.html</ref> it is highly unlikely that the ship would have been near Virginia on 9 March, as that location would have placed her only about a day from Baltimore. In any event, ''Cyclops'' never made it to Baltimore, and no wreckage of her has ever been found.<ref name="usnsh-c/cyclops.htm">[http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-c/cyclops.htm USN Ships-USS CYCLOPS (1910-1918)]</ref> Reports indicate that on 10 March, the day after the ship was rumored to have been sighted by ''Amolco'', a violent storm swept through the Virginia Cape area. While some suggest that the combination of the overloaded condition, engine trouble, and bad weather may have conspired to sink the ''Cyclops'',<ref name="Strange" /> an extensive naval investigation concluded: "Many theories have been advanced, but none that satisfactorily accounts for her disappearance."<ref name="bermuda-triangle.org"/> |
||
A complete list of the crew and passengers lost in the incident are available from the Department of the Navy's [[Naval Historical Center]].<ref name="cyclops-1.htm"/> |
A complete list of the crew and passengers lost in the incident are available from the Department of the Navy's [[Naval Historical Center]].<ref name="cyclops-1.htm"/> |
||
Revision as of 00:10, 25 June 2010
| |
| History | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Name | USS Cyclops |
| Namesake | Cyclops |
| Builder | William Cramp and Sons, Philadelphia |
| Launched | 7 May 1910 |
| Commissioned | 1 May 1917 |
| Fate | Lost at sea, March 1918 |
| General characteristics | |
| Class and type | Proteus-class collier |
| Displacement | 19,360 long tons (19,670 t) full |
| Length | 542 ft (165 m) |
| Beam | 65 ft (20 m) |
| Draft | 27 ft 8 in (8.43 m) |
| Speed | 15 kn (17 mph; 28 km/h) |
| Complement | 236 officers and enlisted |
| Armament | 4 × 4 in (100 mm) guns |
USS Cyclops (AC-4) was one of four Proteus-class colliers built for the United States Navy several years before World War I. Named for the Cyclops, a primordial race of giants from Greek mythology, she was the second U.S. Naval vessel to bear the name. The loss of the ship and 306 crew and passengers without a trace sometime after 4 March 1918 remains the single largest loss of life in U.S. Naval history not directly involving combat. The ship's fate is still a mystery that remains unsolved to this day. No wreckage of the vessel has ever been found.
History
Cyclops was launched on 7 May 1910, by William Cramp and Sons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and placed in service on 7 November 1910, with Lieutenant Commander George Worley, Master, Naval Auxiliary Service, in command. Operating with the Naval Auxiliary Service, Atlantic Fleet, she voyaged in the Baltic from May-July 1911 to supply Second Division ships. Returning to Norfolk, Virginia, she operated on the east coast from Newport, Rhode Island, to the Caribbean, servicing the fleet. During the troubled conditions in Mexico in 1914-1915, she coaled ships on patrol there and received the thanks of the U.S. State Department for cooperation in evacuating refugees.
With American entry into World War I, Cyclops was commissioned on 1 May 1917, and her skipper, George W. Worley, promoted to full commander (U.S. officer paygrade 5, the equivalent of lieutenant colonel in the Army, Air Force and Marines). She joined a convoy for Saint-Nazaire, France in June 1917, returning to the U.S. in July. Except for a voyage to Halifax, Nova Scotia, she served along the east coast until 9 January 1918, when she was assigned to Naval Overseas Transportation Service. She then sailed to Brazilian waters to fuel British ships in the south Atlantic, receiving the thanks of the State Department and CINCPAC.[1][2]
She put to sea from Rio de Janeiro on 16 February 1918. On 20 February, Cyclops entered Bahia. Two days later, she departed for Baltimore, Maryland — with no stops scheduled — carrying a load of 10,800 long tons (11,000 t) of manganese ore to be used in the manufacture of munitions. The ship was thought to be overloaded when she left Brazil, as her maximum capacity was 8,000 long tons (8,100 t).[3] Before leaving port, Commander Worley had submitted a report that the starboard engine had a cracked cylinder and was not operative, a report confirmed by a survey board, which recommended, however, that ship returned to the United States.[3] She made an unscheduled stop in Barbados because the water line was over the Plimsoll line, indicating an overloaded condition;[3] however investigations in Rio proved the ship had been loaded and secured properly.[4] Cyclops then set out for Baltimore, and was rumored to have been sighted on 9 March by the molasses tanker Amolco near Virginia,[3] but this was denied by the Amolco's captain.[5] Additionally, because Cyclops was not due in Baltimore until March 13,[6] it is highly unlikely that the ship would have been near Virginia on 9 March, as that location would have placed her only about a day from Baltimore. In any event, Cyclops never made it to Baltimore, and no wreckage of her has ever been found.[7] Reports indicate that on 10 March, the day after the ship was rumored to have been sighted by Amolco, a violent storm swept through the Virginia Cape area. While some suggest that the combination of the overloaded condition, engine trouble, and bad weather may have conspired to sink the Cyclops,[3] an extensive naval investigation concluded: "Many theories have been advanced, but none that satisfactorily accounts for her disappearance."[4]
A complete list of the crew and passengers lost in the incident are available from the Department of the Navy's Naval Historical Center.[1]
Accusations
At about the time the search for Cyclops was called off, an alarming telegram was received by the State Department from Brockholst Livingston, the U.S. consul on Barbados:
- Secretary of State
- Washington, D.C.
- April 17, 2 p.m.
- Department's 15th. Confidential. Master CYCLOPS stated that required six hundred tons coal having sufficient on board to reach Bermuda. Engines very poor condition. Not sufficient funds and therefore requested payment by me. Unusually reticent. I have ascertained he took here ton fresh meat, ton flour, thousand pounds vegetables, paying therefore 775 dollars. From different sources gather the following: he had plenty of coal, alleged inferior, took coal to mix, probably had more than fifteen hundred tons. Master alluded to by others as damned Dutchman, apparently disliked by other officers. Rumored disturbances en route hither, men confined and one executed; also had some prisoners from the fleet in Brazilian waters, one life sentence. United States Consul-General Gottschalk passenger, 231 crew exclusive of officers and passengers. Have names of crew but not of all the officers and passengers. Many Germanic names appear. Number telegraphic or wireless messages addressed to master or in care of ship were delivered at this port. All telegrams for Barbadoes on file head office St. Thomas. I have to suggest scrutiny there. While not having any definite grounds I fear fate worse than sinking though possibly based on instinctive dislike felt towards master.
- LIVINGSTON, CONSUL.[8]
Investigations by the Office of Naval Intelligence revealed that Captain Worley was born Johan Frederick Wichmann in Sandstadt, Hanover, Germany in 1862, and that he had come to America by jumping ship in San Francisco in 1878. By 1898, he had changed his name to Worley (after a seaman friend), and succeeded in owning and operating a saloon in San Francisco's Barbary Coast. He also got help from brothers whom he had convinced to emigrate. During this time he had qualified to the position of ship's master, and had commanded several civilian merchant ships, picking up and delivering cargo (both legal and illegal; some accounts say opium) from the Far East to San Francisco. Unfortunately, the crews of these ships reported that Worley suffered from a personality allegedly akin to that of HMS Bounty's captain William Bligh; the crew was often brutalized by Worley for trivial things.
Naval investigators discovered information from former crew members about Worley's habits. He would berate and curse officers and men for minor offenses, sometimes getting violent; at one point, he had allegedly chased an ensign about the ship with a pistol. Saner times would find him making his rounds about the ship dressed in long underwear and a derby hat. Worley sometimes would have an inexperienced officer in charge of loading cargo on the ship while the more experienced man was confined to quarters. In Rio de Janeiro, one such man was assigned to oversee the loading of manganese ore, something a collier was not used to carrying, and in this instance the ship was overloaded, which may have contributed to her sinking. The most serious accusation against Worley was that he was pro-German in wartime and may have colluded with the enemy; indeed, his closest friends and associates were either German or Americans of German descent. "Many Germanic names appear" Livingston stated, speculating that the ship had many German sympathizers on board. One of the passengers on the final voyage was Alfred Louis Moreau Gottschalk, the consul-general in Rio de Janeiro, who was as roundly hated for his pro-German sympathies as was Worley. Livingston stated he believed Gottschalk may have been directly involved in collaborating with Worley on handing the ship over to the Germans.[9] After World War I, German records were checked to ascertain the fate of Cyclops, whether by Worley's hand or by submarine attack. Nothing was found.
See also
Newspaper references
- "Cold High Winds Do $25,000 Damage'" Washington Post, 11 March 1918.
- "Collier Overdue A Month", New York Times, 15 April 1918.
- "More Ships Hunt For Missing Cyclops", New York Times, 16 April 1918.
- "Haven't Given Up Hope For Cyclops", New York Times, 17 April 1918.
- "Collier Cyclops Is Lost; 293 Persons On Board; Enemy Blow Suspected", Washington Post, 15 April 1918.
- "U.S. Consul Gottschalk Coming To Enter The War", Washington Post, 15 April 1918.
- "Cyclops Skipper Teuton, 'Tis Said", Washington Post, 16 April 1918.
- "Fate Of Ship Baffles", Washington Post, 16 April 1918.
- "Steamer Met Gale On Cyclops' Course", Washington Post, 19 April 1918.
References
- ^ a b USS Cyclops
- ^ USS Henry R. Mallory
- ^ a b c d e Reck, Alfred P. (June 1929). "Strangest American Sea Mystery is Solved at Last". Popular Science: 15–17. Retrieved 8 July 2009. In this article, Amolco was erroneously called Amalco.
- ^ a b url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/cyclops_pg3.html
- ^ url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/q_a.html
- ^ url=http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/cyclops_pg2_.html
- ^ USN Ships-USS CYCLOPS (1910-1918)
- ^ Telegram
- ^ Letter on Gottschalk
This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships.- "Cyclops ". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
- "AC-4 Cyclops". Service Ship Photo Archive. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
- NUMA site and Clive Cussler's brief report on the Cyclops.
External links
List of Bermuda Triangle incidents | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
