User:Supuhstar

erit ko

Userboxes

This user scored 4876 (You are a Wikipediholic) on the Wikipediholic test.

HMThis user was a beta tester of Windows Live Hotmail.

This user thinks the Nintendo DS is the best handheld console ever. Even more so than the DS Lite

This user is part of the Sims task force

cel-3This user is an advanced cellist.

vn-5This user page has been vandalized 5 times.

This user is not a Wikipedia administrator but would like to be one someday.

This user is a Simpedia admin.

Wikipedia:Babel

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

es-2Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.

LE-0This individual still maintains a shred of dignity in this insane world by adhering to correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalisation.

Search user languages

Before you Enter

You should know that...

• The life of you and most everyone you know is destroyed if no one shotguns your computer after you get this dialogue box.

    

• This page is being remade. to view my progress, please go here.
• my signature didn't always look like this: — Supuhstar * §

Agree :I am an Admin on Simpedia

Template:Contra:No one on Wikipedia seems to care that it exists.

I go to Collins Hill High School and am proud of it.

Yes, I think that Wikipedia is reliable.

Many people believe that Wikipedia is an un-reliable source. I think differently.

If you ask somebody why Wikipedia's not reliable they will most certainly say, "Oh, because anybody can edit it. People can put whatever they want". There are several things, in my opinion, wrong with that. For example: There are (I believe) many more people trying to prevent vandalism than there are people vandalizing. Most of the time a vandalized article will come to the attention of somebody in, at the very most, an hour and that person will go over there and either undo the edit or take out the vandalism.

Though articles may be written by just an ordinary Joe, that doesn't mean that they are any less reliable. Most people who write articles spend time researching the subject, sometimes as much as the people who write books on the subject!

While I agree that Wikipedia is a good source, I don't think it should be your only source. If you are going to write a paper, I would suggest using at least three sources, or at least check the facts found on Wikipedia at another site. Also, I believe that you should check to make sure there are good references at the bottom of each page you use.

This is my personal opinion as to why Wikipedia can be a reliable source, and if you think differently, fine. This is just an essay stating my opinion, and if you really want to debate that, do it on The Talk Page.

Wii 2

I wrote a page, but it got deleted...

Yes, I have a secret page.

If you can find it, you get a barnstar!

---

Where else you can find me

Sites	Username
SupuhWiki	Supuhstar
deviantART	Supuhstar
Fur Affinity	Supuhstar
HRWiki	Supuhstar
Newgrounds	Supuhstar
Simpedia	Supuhstar
The Sims	Supuhstar
The Sims 2	Supuhstar1
The Sims 3	Supuhstar
Sims Wiki	Supuhstar
Strategy Wiki	Supuhstar
Twitter	Supuhstar
Uncyclopedia	Supuhstar
Wii Wiki	Supuhstar
WikiFur	Supuhstar
Wiktionary	Supuhstar
Wikipedia	Supuhstar
YouTube	Supuhstar
IM Services	Username
AIM	Supuhstar0
Skype	Supuhstar
Astra	Supuhstar
Windows Live Messenger	ben_sims2@msn.com

VANDALIZE HERE!

end transmission Klaxon!