Talk:François Roche: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
They is a large debat in France about this architect on Wikipedia, because he appear typically as a person "who is not prophet in his own country" but very well know in others. For example he is the only french to have been selected in the international pavilion at the next Biennale of Venice (he did it 7 times as a Guiness Record !). That creats a lot of Jalousy in France. |
They is a large debat in France about this architect on Wikipedia, because he appear typically as a person "who is not prophet in his own country" but very well know in others. For example he is the only french to have been selected in the international pavilion at the next Biennale of Venice (he did it 7 times as a Guiness Record !). That creats a lot of Jalousy in France. |
||
The people who want to erase him in France are the same who try here to ask suppresion in Wiki US (mister Thomas1020). |
The people who want to erase him in France are the same who try here to ask suppresion in Wiki US (mister Thomas1020 and Nakor and two others as a group of lobyying). |
||
They are using Wiki as a chapel war to protect their own taste and cultural vision. It is a shame. |
They are using Wiki as a chapel war to protect their own taste and cultural vision. It is a shame. |
||
The french decide 3 month ago to autorise the article about him (http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia%3ADemande_de_restauration_de_page&action=historysubmit&diff=52006773&oldid=52006144#Fran.C3.A7ois_Roche_.28architecte.29) but the same persons are now coming back to try to ask again its suppression. --[[User:Noname555|Noname555]] ([[User talk:Noname555|talk]]) 17:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC) |
The french decide 3 month ago to autorise the article about him (http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia%3ADemande_de_restauration_de_page&action=historysubmit&diff=52006773&oldid=52006144#Fran.C3.A7ois_Roche_.28architecte.29) but the same persons are now coming back to try to ask again its suppression. --[[User:Noname555|Noname555]] ([[User talk:Noname555|talk]]) 17:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:24, 7 July 2010
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
Deletion of article
The article is basically a résumé for an architect whose notoriety is problematically low for being granted by an encyclopedic article, and whose interventions on the wiki has shown little respect for the collective process of elaboration, and use of personnal intervention. After long discussions, the french-speaking wikipedia has decided to suppress the page. Why not considering it for the english one? As the quality seems to be as low as the french was. Discussion for page suppression in french --Thomas1020 (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- The French Wikipedia is independent of the English Wikipedia and as a result the standards for article inclusion are likely to vary, so deletion of an article on one project does not mean its equivalent should be deleted here. However, if there are good reasons for deleting this page then please feel free to take it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Please ask if you need any help nominating. CT Cooper · talk 09:10, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
They is a large debat in France about this architect on Wikipedia, because he appear typically as a person "who is not prophet in his own country" but very well know in others. For example he is the only french to have been selected in the international pavilion at the next Biennale of Venice (he did it 7 times as a Guiness Record !). That creats a lot of Jalousy in France. The people who want to erase him in France are the same who try here to ask suppresion in Wiki US (mister Thomas1020 and Nakor and two others as a group of lobyying). They are using Wiki as a chapel war to protect their own taste and cultural vision. It is a shame. The french decide 3 month ago to autorise the article about him (http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia%3ADemande_de_restauration_de_page&action=historysubmit&diff=52006773&oldid=52006144#Fran.C3.A7ois_Roche_.28architecte.29) but the same persons are now coming back to try to ask again its suppression. --Noname555 (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)