User talk:Daedalus969: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
this is what I wrote: |
this is what I wrote: |
||
: and just a note to you......my remarks have to do (as you obviously are not absorbing anything that was quoted verbatim in WP policy) specifically with the matter of a user REMOVING OR RETAINING STUFF from his own user page. That is NOT the same as other pages. So in THAT sense the "No Ownership" thing does not apply. And the fact that you would be vindictive and childish enough to "report" me shows that the Novaseminary schmuck-bombs of the world are MORE THAN ONE.... So kindly don't write me again or bother with me again. If you're too dense and slow to understand that a person's OWN USER PAGE is NOT exactly the same as any other page, and think it's 100% the same in every single way, despite WP policy evidence to the contrary, there's not much I can do for you....so kindly get lost and keep you opinions and nonsense to yourself. thanks. [[User:Sweetpoet|Sweetpoet]] ([[User talk:Sweetpoet|talk]]) 23: |
: and just a note to you......my remarks have to do (as you obviously are not absorbing anything that was quoted verbatim in WP policy) specifically with the matter of a user REMOVING OR RETAINING STUFF from his own user page. That is NOT the same as other pages. So in THAT sense the "No Ownership" thing does not apply. And the fact that you would be vindictive and childish enough to "report" me shows that the Novaseminary schmuck-bombs of the world are MORE THAN ONE.... So kindly don't write me again or bother with me again. If you're too dense and slow to understand that a person's OWN USER PAGE is NOT exactly the same as any other page, and think it's 100% the same in every single way, despite WP policy evidence to the contrary, there's not much I can do for you....so kindly get lost and keep you opinions and nonsense to yourself. thanks. (PS...in case you didn't know already, this whole matter HAS ALREADY BEEN REPORTED to the board pages, this very thing.....and it was deemed to just leave matters alone.) [[User:Sweetpoet|Sweetpoet]] ([[User talk:Sweetpoet#top|talk]]) 23:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:53, 21 July 2010
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Speedy deletion declined: Jim Horne (model)
Hello Daedalus969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jim Horne (model), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 05:54, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Jeff G.'s inappropriate sig
This is up, again; it's per a comment at User talk:Δ#July 2010. Cheers, Jack Merridew 23:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Revert of edit to WP Talk:Signatures
Recently, you reverted an edit to Wikipedia talk:Signatures, where a post was made in another language. In the future, unless you speak the language (Sinhala, according to Wolfram|Alpha), or you have translated it, I don't believe you should revert it. I have asked an english-speaking admin on the Sinhalla Wiki to translate, in the mean time the edit stays. A p3rson ‽ 18:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Your remarks and threats on my page....
since YOU decided to chime in on my page with your opinions and rudeness...I am just letting you know that I responded, and I'm bringing my response to you here, as to what I said...
this is what I wrote:
- and just a note to you......my remarks have to do (as you obviously are not absorbing anything that was quoted verbatim in WP policy) specifically with the matter of a user REMOVING OR RETAINING STUFF from his own user page. That is NOT the same as other pages. So in THAT sense the "No Ownership" thing does not apply. And the fact that you would be vindictive and childish enough to "report" me shows that the Novaseminary schmuck-bombs of the world are MORE THAN ONE.... So kindly don't write me again or bother with me again. If you're too dense and slow to understand that a person's OWN USER PAGE is NOT exactly the same as any other page, and think it's 100% the same in every single way, despite WP policy evidence to the contrary, there's not much I can do for you....so kindly get lost and keep you opinions and nonsense to yourself. thanks. (PS...in case you didn't know already, this whole matter HAS ALREADY BEEN REPORTED to the board pages, this very thing.....and it was deemed to just leave matters alone.) Sweetpoet (talk) 23:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)