Talk:Tasmin Lucia-Khan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:40, 8 August 2010

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:WikiProject Oxford Brooks University

Journalism Stub‑class

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

60 second update at 23.00 on the 14th January 2009

Did anybody else hear what I heard? No? Davu.leon (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not me, but I think I know what you're talking about. I suspect this incident has received enough coverage to be worthy of inclusion here. Open4D (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naked Modelling

I know many muslims who built this page will not be happy abput it, but it is still part of life. Can we include it? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3082604/Raunchy-secret-of-telly-news-girl-Tasmin-Khan.html Reaper7 (talk) 12:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the first photo in your link. I think it is photoshop :) --85.102.117.32 (talk) 15:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's all over the British press, and the Sun newspaper for better or worse is a WP:RS. Whether it is encyclopedic is another question, but verifiability is easily met.173.2.230.224 (talk) 03:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)KD Tries Again[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 [[User:Reaper7|Reaper7]] ([[User talk:Reaper7|talk]]) 12:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 :Look at the first photo in your link. I think it is photoshop :) --[[Special:Contributions/85.102.117.32|85.102.117.32]] ([[User talk:85.102.117.32|talk]]) 15:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
-::No, it's all over the British press. Whether it is encyclopedic is another question, but WP Verifiability is easily met.[[Special:Contributions/173.2.230.224|173.2.230.224]] ([[User talk:173.2.230.224|talk]]) 03:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)KD Tries Again
+::No, it's all over the British press, and the Sun newspaper for better or worse is a WP:RS. Whether it is encyclopedic is another question, but verifiability is easily met.[[Special:Contributions/173.2.230.224|173.2.230.224]] ([[User talk:173.2.230.224|talk]]) 03:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)KD Tries Again