Jump to content

Marc Hauser: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Ravpy8 (talk | contribs)
32 edits
→Officially released information: Moved redundant statement about the administrations that will conduct their own investigations
Ravpy8 (talk | contribs)
32 edits
→Unconfirmed allegations: Added qualifications to allegations
Line 29: Line 29:
In addition the confirmed and publicly available information above, various publications relayed more specific accusations.
In addition the confirmed and publicly available information above, various publications relayed more specific accusations.


According to a report in ''The New Scientist'', unnamed scientists in the field have claimed that Harvard decided to investigate Hauser's lab after students who had worked there made allegations of data falsification.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19293-misconduct-found-in-harvard-animal-morality-profs-lab.html |title=Misconduct found in Harvard animal morality prof's lab - life - 11 August 2010 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2010.1441 |publisher=New Scientist |date=2010-08-04 |accessdate=2010-08-12}}</ref> The ''New York Times'' quotes [[Michael Tomasello]], another well-known animal cognition researcher, as claiming that some of Hauser's previous students personally told him that there "was a pattern and they had specific evidence ”<ref name="nytimes2"/>. Tomasello also claimed that he has information from "a Harvard faculty member and from former students of Dr. Hauser" that the investigation found evidence for eight counts of scientific misconduct.<ref name="nytimes2">{{cite news|title=In Inquiry at Marc Hauser’s Harvard Lab, a Raid and Then a 3-Year Wait|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/education/14harvard.html?pagewanted=2|page=2|work=New York Times|date=August 13, 2010}}</ref> However, it could not be confirmed that any of Hauser's students has been in contact with Tomasello, and it is unknown whether he has any relation to Hauser's laboratory at all, given that the two laboratories are in competition.
According to a report in ''The New Scientist'', unnamed scientists in the field have claimed that Harvard decided to investigate Hauser's lab after students who had worked there made allegations of data falsification.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19293-misconduct-found-in-harvard-animal-morality-profs-lab.html |title=Misconduct found in Harvard animal morality prof's lab - life - 11 August 2010 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2010.1441 |publisher=New Scientist |date=2010-08-04 |accessdate=2010-08-12}}</ref> The ''New York Times'' quotes [[Michael Tomasello]], another well-known animal cognition researcher and competitor of Hauser's, as claiming that some of Hauser's previous students personally told him that there "was a pattern and they had specific evidence ”<ref name="nytimes2"/>. Tomasello also claimed that he has information from "a Harvard faculty member and from former students of Dr. Hauser" that the investigation found evidence for eight counts of scientific misconduct.<ref name="nytimes2">{{cite news|title=In Inquiry at Marc Hauser’s Harvard Lab, a Raid and Then a 3-Year Wait|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/education/14harvard.html?pagewanted=2|page=2|work=New York Times|date=August 13, 2010}}</ref> However, it could not be confirmed that any of Hauser's students has been in contact with Tomasello, and it is unknown whether he has any relation to Hauser's laboratory at all, given that the two laboratories are in competition.


On August 19, 2010, ''The Chronicle of Higher Education'' reported the contents of allegations made by a former research assistant of Hauser's. The former research assistant alleged that Hauser falsely coded videotapes of monkey behavior, resisted his research assistants and students' requests to have them recoded by another observer and then pressured his students to accept his data analysis. When they went ahead and recoded the data without Hauser's permission, they allegedly found that Hauser's coding bore little relation to what was on the tapes. According to the document, several other lab members allegedly had similar run-ins with Hauser. <ref>{{cite web |url=http://chronicle.com/article/Document-Sheds-Light-on/123988/ |title=Document Sheds Light on Investigation at Harvard|publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education|accessdate=2010-08-21 }}</ref> In 2007, the research assistant decided, therefore, to report his concerns about Hauser's 2001 paper to Harvard investigators. However, these claims and allegations have not be confirmed independently. The detail that a research assistant was allegedly concerned about at least six year old data has not been confirmed either.
On August 19, 2010, ''The Chronicle of Higher Education'' reported the contents of allegations made by an individual who self-identified as a former research assistant of Hauser's. The alleged former research assistant alleged that Hauser falsely coded videotapes of monkey behavior, resisted his research assistants and students' requests to have them recoded by another observer and then pressured his students to accept his data analysis. When they went ahead and recoded the data without Hauser's permission, they allegedly found that Hauser's coding bore little relation to what was on the tapes. According to the document, several other lab members allegedly had similar run-ins with Hauser. <ref>{{cite web |url=http://chronicle.com/article/Document-Sheds-Light-on/123988/ |title=Document Sheds Light on Investigation at Harvard|publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education|accessdate=2010-08-21 }}</ref> In 2007, the alleged research assistant decided, therefore, to report his concerns about Hauser's 2001 paper to Harvard investigators. However, these claims and allegations have not be confirmed independently. The detail that a research assistant was allegedly concerned about at least six year old data has not been confirmed either.


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==

Revision as of 08:25, 22 August 2010

Marc Hauser sitting between Jon Meacham (far left) and Daniel Dennett (center), World Science Festival

Marc D. Hauser (25 October 1959) is an American evolutionary biologist who teaches at the Psychology Department at Harvard University. In August 2010, Harvard found him solely responsible for eight counts of scientific misconduct.[1]

Biography

He received a BS from Bucknell University and a PhD from UCLA. Currently, Hauser is a Harvard College Professor, and Professor in the Departments of Psychology, Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, and Biological Anthropology. He is the co-director of the Mind, Brain, and Behavior Program at Harvard, Director of the Cognitive Evolution Lab, and adjunct Professor in the Graduate School of Education and the Program in Neurosciences.

Hauser's research sits at the interface between evolutionary biology and cognitive neuroscience and is aimed at understanding the processes and consequences of cognitive evolution. Observations and experiments focus on nonhuman animals and humans of different ages and mental competence, incorporating methodological procedures and theoretical insights from ethology, infant cognitive development, evolutionary theory, cognitive neuroscience and neurobiology. Current foci include: studies of language evolution, the nature of moral judgments, the development and evolution of mathematical representations, comparative studies of economic-like choice, the precursors to musical competence, and the nature of event perception. One of his research projects is internet based 'The Moral Sense Test' in which the participant is presented with a series of hypothetical moral dilemmas and is asked to offer a judgment regarding each one.

Awards

Hauser is the recipient of a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a science medal from the Collège de France, and a Guggenheim Fellowship. He has published approximately 200 articles in major research journals as well as six books.

His work has frequently been covered by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Boston Globe, and The Washington Post, and he makes frequent appearances on various NPR shows, as well as television and international radio.

Allegations of scientific misconduct

In August 2010 it was announced that Hauser had decided to take a leave of absence from Harvard, after a three year long internal investigation found him solely responsible for eight counts of scientific misconduct. The results of this investigation, including the sanctions applied to Hauser, have not been publicly released and the lack of transparency in this investigation has evoked substantial speculation about what the investigation actually uncovered. Writing in The New York Times, Nicholas Wade summarized the situation as follows:

There is a wide spectrum of scientific sins, ranging from wrist-slap offenses like bad data storage at one end, to data fabrication at the other. It is still not clear where on this spectrum Dr. Hauser’s errors may fall. He has admitted only to unspecified "mistakes," not to misconduct.[2]

Officially released information

On Aug 20, the dean of Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences released a statement confirming that an investigation has found Hauser guilty of eight counts of scientific misconduct[3]. Three counts involve published papers (detailed below); five involved unpublished studies. The statement said that Harvard is cooperating with further investigations by the PHS Office of Research Integrity, the NSF Office of Inspector General and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts. They will conduct their own review and make their conclusions available to the public.[4]

A paper published in the journal Cognition in 2002 has been retracted.[5][6] In this paper, Hauser and his collaborators concluded that cotton-top tamarin monkeys can learn simple rule-like patterns. The journal Cognition retracted the paper:

An internal examination at Harvard University of the research reported in “Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins,” Cognition 86 (2002), pp. B15-B22, found that the data do not support the reported findings. We therefore are retracting this article. MH [Marc Hauser] accepts responsibility for the error.[7]

In two additional published papers, some field notes or video recordings were "incomplete", although Hauser and his co-author claim to have replicated the experiments.[8][9]The Proceedings of the Royal Society published the replication of the missing data in an addendum to one of the papers[10]. However, while the authors have submitted results that claimed to replicate data missing from a 2007 Science paper, the status of that paper is unclear. The new data are under review, but a spokesperson for Science stated that the editorial team is uncomfortable about making a decision without knowing the results of the Harvard investigation.[11]

Unconfirmed allegations

In addition the confirmed and publicly available information above, various publications relayed more specific accusations.

According to a report in The New Scientist, unnamed scientists in the field have claimed that Harvard decided to investigate Hauser's lab after students who had worked there made allegations of data falsification.[12] The New York Times quotes Michael Tomasello, another well-known animal cognition researcher and competitor of Hauser's, as claiming that some of Hauser's previous students personally told him that there "was a pattern and they had specific evidence ”[13]. Tomasello also claimed that he has information from "a Harvard faculty member and from former students of Dr. Hauser" that the investigation found evidence for eight counts of scientific misconduct.[13] However, it could not be confirmed that any of Hauser's students has been in contact with Tomasello, and it is unknown whether he has any relation to Hauser's laboratory at all, given that the two laboratories are in competition.

On August 19, 2010, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported the contents of allegations made by an individual who self-identified as a former research assistant of Hauser's. The alleged former research assistant alleged that Hauser falsely coded videotapes of monkey behavior, resisted his research assistants and students' requests to have them recoded by another observer and then pressured his students to accept his data analysis. When they went ahead and recoded the data without Hauser's permission, they allegedly found that Hauser's coding bore little relation to what was on the tapes. According to the document, several other lab members allegedly had similar run-ins with Hauser. [14] In 2007, the alleged research assistant decided, therefore, to report his concerns about Hauser's 2001 paper to Harvard investigators. However, these claims and allegations have not be confirmed independently. The detail that a research assistant was allegedly concerned about at least six year old data has not been confirmed either.

Bibliography

  • Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think (illustrated by Ted Dewan) (Henry Holt, NY 2000)
  • Moral Minds: How Nature Designed a Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Harper Collins/Ecco, NY 2006).
  • Evilicious: explaining our evolved taste for killing, torture, revenge, greed, mockery and masochism (in prep) (Viking/Penguin-USA; Random House UK.

References

  1. ^ Harvard Dean Confirms Misconduct in Hauser Investigation, Science, August 20, 2010
  2. ^ Nicholas Wade (20 August 2010) Harvard Finds Scientist Guilty of Misconduct The New York Times
  3. ^ http://harvardmagazine.com/breaking-news/harvard-dean-details-hauser-scientific-misconduct
  4. ^ http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Harvard-Confirms-Hausergate/26198/
  5. ^ Peter Aldhous (11 August 2010) Misconduct found in Harvard animal morality prof's lab New Scientist
  6. ^ Carolyn Y. Johnson (10 Aug 2010). Author on leave after Harvard inquiry Boston Globe.
  7. ^ http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/monkey-business-2002-cognition-paper-retracted-as-prominent-psychologist-marc-hauser-takes-leave-from-harvard/
  8. ^ Nicholas Wade (12 August 2010) Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect New York Times
  9. ^ Marc D. Hauser1,2,* and Justin N. Wood3 (2010-07-28). "Replication of 'Rhesus monkeys correctly read the goal-relevant gestures of a human agent' — Proceedings B". Rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org. Retrieved 2010-08-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2010/07/22/rspb.2010.1441
  11. ^ http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100817/full/466908a.html#B3
  12. ^ "Misconduct found in Harvard animal morality prof's lab - life - 11 August 2010". New Scientist. 2010-08-04. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1441. Retrieved 2010-08-12.
  13. ^ a b "In Inquiry at Marc Hauser's Harvard Lab, a Raid and Then a 3-Year Wait". New York Times. August 13, 2010. p. 2.
  14. ^ "Document Sheds Light on Investigation at Harvard". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2010-08-21.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marc_Hauser&oldid=380289660"