Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xchanging: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Keep''' Overall the article is not written like an advertisement. The company is listed publicly in London and is in the [[FTSE250]], which convinces me that it meets [[WP:NOTE]]. [[User:Miles_Blues|<span style='font-family: "Comic Sans MS"; color:#5342F'>Miles Blues</span>]] ([[User talk:Miles_Blues|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Miles_Blues|contribs]]) 15:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' Overall the article is not written like an advertisement. The company is listed publicly in London and is in the [[FTSE250]], which convinces me that it meets [[WP:NOTE]]. [[User:Miles_Blues|<span style='font-family: "Comic Sans MS"; color:#5342F'>Miles Blues</span>]] ([[User talk:Miles_Blues|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Miles_Blues|contribs]]) 15:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:'''Comment'''. Notability is not the real problem here; but even if this were a notable business, as it might be, it still leaves me mostly clueless as to what they make or do. And it is pretty blatant advertising. Text like this, vaguely promising vague advantage while carefully steering clear of the sort of representation that might constitute an offer binding in law, does not belong in an encyclopedia: ''It is a distinctive mode of engagement that can create new value for both client and service provider. The Enterprise Partnership model engenders a different set of motivations and behaviours than a simple fee-for-service arrangement, and is a unique approach to handling large and complex business processes that re-shifts the emphasis back towards the notion of partnership.'' - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 18:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC) |
:'''Comment'''. Notability is not the real problem here; but even if this were a notable business, as it might be, it still leaves me mostly clueless as to what they make or do. And it is pretty blatant advertising. Text like this, vaguely promising vague advantage while carefully steering clear of the sort of representation that might constitute an offer binding in law, does not belong in an encyclopedia: ''It is a distinctive mode of engagement that can create new value for both client and service provider. The Enterprise Partnership model engenders a different set of motivations and behaviours than a simple fee-for-service arrangement, and is a unique approach to handling large and complex business processes that re-shifts the emphasis back towards the notion of partnership.'' - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 18:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:'''Comment'''. Tried to back up wiki with referencing and links to articles. How else could the page be improved? Any suggestions welcome! |
|||
Revision as of 12:10, 23 August 2010
- Xchanging (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested proposed deletion. Regardless of whether this business is notable or not, this article is unambiguous advertising. It is also patent nonsense. We're told that this is a business processing company and that it operates a global production model, which is all very nice, but we're still left wondering what its 8000 employees do for a living. We'd be better off not pretending to have an article about this business than having this pretending to be an article. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
Keep Overall the article is not written like an advertisement. The company is listed publicly in London and is in the FTSE250, which convinces me that it meets WP:NOTE. Miles Blues (talk · contribs) 15:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Notability is not the real problem here; but even if this were a notable business, as it might be, it still leaves me mostly clueless as to what they make or do. And it is pretty blatant advertising. Text like this, vaguely promising vague advantage while carefully steering clear of the sort of representation that might constitute an offer binding in law, does not belong in an encyclopedia: It is a distinctive mode of engagement that can create new value for both client and service provider. The Enterprise Partnership model engenders a different set of motivations and behaviours than a simple fee-for-service arrangement, and is a unique approach to handling large and complex business processes that re-shifts the emphasis back towards the notion of partnership. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Tried to back up wiki with referencing and links to articles. How else could the page be improved? Any suggestions welcome!