Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Kacaniklic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:35, 31 August 2010

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted by PROD back in 2008, nothing has changed in this player's career since then - he still fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 17:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He has just signed for Fulham - lots of people will want to read about him Fulhamfb (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If people want to read that "Alex Kacaniklic is a player for Fulham" then they can look at the BBC or something. He is not currently notable for Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 19:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He will be when he breaks into the team....just like any other player....no reason to delete Fulhamfb (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also the information isn't available anywhere else....BBC wouldn't have anything on him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulhamfb (talk • contribs) 20:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saying "he will be famous in the future" is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. And because his career is so early, and consists of nothing beyond him being a youth player for Fulham, there are many more sources (club profile page, for example) that are currently much more suitable than Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 20:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He has no club profile page...you seem to have something against him. You said his carreer was a 'fail'. Fulhamfb (talk) 20:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Using the 'crystal ball' arguement is completely irrelevant....I looked him up, I'm sure thousands of Fulham fans wanted to know who he was. He is already famous and is a dead cert to become more famous. Your ideas have no base. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulhamfb (talk • contribs) 20:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If he doesn't even have a club profile page, then surely that shows his lack of notability?! Of course I have nothing against the player, where did I say his career was a "fail"? Giant Snowman 20:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't have a page because he just joined......you said: he still fails.Fulhamfb (talk) 20:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ::::*Using the 'crystal ball' arguement is completely irrelevant....I looked him up, I'm sure thousands of Fulham fans wanted to know who he was. He is already famous and is a dead cert to become more famous. Your ideas have no base.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fulhamfb|Fulhamfb]] ([[User talk:Fulhamfb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fulhamfb|contribs]]) 20:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :::::*If he doesn't even have a club profile page, then surely that shows his lack of notability?! Of course I have nothing against the player, where did I say his career was a "fail"? [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 20:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
+He doesn't have a page because he just joined......you said: he still fails.[[User:Fulhamfb|Fulhamfb]] ([[User talk:Fulhamfb|talk]]) 20:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)