Talk:Trudie Styler: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:02, 31 August 2010

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Employment tribunal

The contents about the tribunal were removed and the only rationale given was 'irrelevance'. I've undone the changes, but im not dogmatic about what should or shouldn't be in a wiki article. If the feeling is this isn't wiki material by all means delete, but i'd just appreciate a more through reasoning.Zaq12wsx 13:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly small potatoes, but then I'm not convinced Trudie herself is notable enough for an article. I had to laugh at the quoted excerpt from the judgment: "When looked at holistically...." Who was the judge? Shirley MacLaine? TheScotch (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the tribunal were a bunch of PC types, but even they have holistical problems with Trudie Styler. If they are holisticaly challanged, lets hope no one is....HORIZONTALY challenged (must remember that word). As for TheScotch's initial remarks, Trudie Styler, Sting and Myself (that's Trudie Styler), and also her private jet are involved in blaming Chevron for all the cancer-cases that exist in Ecuador. She was active in the Earth Aid thingy. One might question how any the three of us know her name. This gives her fame enough as to earn her own wiki article. --85.164.220.159 (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Friend of John Ritchie

"A friend of John Ritchie, after a phone call from Matthew Vaughn's godfather she became an executive producer of Guy Ritchie's films..."

Could there POSSIBLY be a more confusing, convoluted English sentence?

B. Polhemus (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there could be. Bear in mind: this is wikipedia. TheScotch (talk) 11:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ::It's certainly small potatoes, but then I'm not convinced Trudie herself is notable enough for an article. I had to laugh at the quoted excerpt from the judgment: "When looked at ''holistically''...." Who was the judge? Shirley MacLaine? [[User:TheScotch|TheScotch]] ([[User talk:TheScotch|talk]]) 11:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
+:::I thought the tribunal were a bunch of PC types, but even they have holistical problems with Trudie Styler. If they are holisticaly challanged, lets hope no one is....HORIZONTALY challenged (must remember that word). As for TheScotch's initial remarks, Trudie Styler, Sting and Myself (that's Trudie Styler), and also her private jet are involved in blaming Chevron for all the cancer-cases that exist in Ecuador. She was active in the Earth Aid thingy. One might question how any the three of us know her name. This gives her fame enough as to earn her own wiki article. --[[Special:Contributions/85.164.220.159|85.164.220.159]] ([[User talk:85.164.220.159|talk]]) 22:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 ==Friend of John Ritchie==