User talk:Fattyjwoods

Just like a short little dog trying to jump for his dinner!

Your edits to Neonatal intensive-care unit

You reverted my edit to add humidicrib as another name for this -- it is a common name for it in Australian English, and also some other nearby countries (maybe due to Australian influence.) I cannot understand your justification for your comments "The recent edit that you made to the page Neonatal intensive-care unit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive". The only thing that seems to be unconstructive is your reverting. --SJK (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Well it would be nice if you put in some refs for your edits wouldnt it. Im not a specialist in that field and cannot distinguish between pure nonsense and scientific jargon so a ref would be of mighty help. Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 09:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, you could try a simple Google search... I didn't give any references, because although I can find heaps of examples of the word being used, I haven't yet found a definition. More to the point, don't bite the newbies. I was actually being an oldie too lazy to login, but for all you knew I was a newbie, to whom you accused of being unconstructive and reverted without (it appears) doing even momentary research... I don't think that makes Wikipedia very welcoming. --SJK (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Im sorry if you got the impression that I was trying to bite you, but my intention was not that. You would be surprised how often humidicrib, bumdibug, (among others do come up). Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 21:58, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Tagging

Hi. I have reverted your edit here because it's a user page therefore the tag isn't applicable. The criterion G7 states: "If the sole author blanks a page outside user space, this can be taken as a deletion request." Thank you. --Efe (talk) 09:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Oops may bad Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 09:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Was trying to help

...by removing an apparent self-written biography, but if you must nitpick then I give up, you can do it. 173.79.109.239 (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC) from the guy editing J. David Shapiro's page

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Fattyjwoods/Hidden Page

User:Fattyjwoods/Hidden Page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fattyjwoods/Hidden Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Fattyjwoods/Hidden Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 04:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:06, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members	Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Canterbury Earthquake - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Canterbury_earthquake

Thanks for your edit re the increased cost - it was a spurious connection anyway, methinks, to relate the cost (orginally at 2 billion) to New Zealand's GDP! (bloody media! :) What a stupid statistic.

Had you not changed it (as the cost has doubled) - I was gonna remove that still irrelevant statistical comment. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DuncanMcC (talk • contribs) 02:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

No worries. Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 02:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)