Mogen clamp: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The Mogen Clamp, one of the three most common circumcision devices, was invented by Rabbi Harry Bronstein in 1954.<ref>http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/rdr5.html</ref> The device is designed to remove the foreskin, while protecting the glans. It has two flat blades that open approx. 3 mm.<ref>http://www.circumstitions.com/methods.html#mogen</ref> They are also able to close, which is why the device is considered a clamp. |
The Mogen Clamp, one of the three most common circumcision devices, was invented by Rabbi Harry Bronstein in 1954.<ref>http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/rdr5.html</ref> The device is designed to remove the foreskin, while protecting the glans. It has two flat blades that open approx. 3 mm.<ref>http://www.circumstitions.com/methods.html#mogen</ref> They are also able to close, which is why the device is considered a clamp. |
||
In July 2010 it was reported that $11 million in damages was awarded against the company that makes the Mogen clamp, after a baby lost a portion of his |
In July 2010 it was reported that $11 million in damages was awarded against the company that makes the Mogen clamp, after a baby lost a portion of his glans consequent to its use.<ref>http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html</ref> |
||
==Pros and cons== |
==Pros and cons== |
||
Revision as of 06:18, 13 September 2010
The Mogen Clamp
The Mogen Clamp, one of the three most common circumcision devices, was invented by Rabbi Harry Bronstein in 1954.[1] The device is designed to remove the foreskin, while protecting the glans. It has two flat blades that open approx. 3 mm.[2] They are also able to close, which is why the device is considered a clamp.
In July 2010 it was reported that $11 million in damages was awarded against the company that makes the Mogen clamp, after a baby lost a portion of his glans consequent to its use.[3]
Pros and cons
Pros: The device requires minimal[clarification needed] medical equipment.[4] It also causes considerably less pain than other devices.[citation needed]
Cons: The circumciser is forced to perform the circumcision somewhat "blindly" because the device hides the penis.
References
 | This article related to medical equipment is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |