User talk:DaveRight: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:37, 9 February 2006

Welcome!

Hi DaveRight! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

That was a canned welcome speech; I hope the rest of your time on WP is more enjoyable. DS 02:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to make it as colourful as wikipedia. DaveRight 06:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration accepted

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 02:54, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing Fred, Will do! DaveRight 03:19, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. -Mys e kurity^{(have you seen this?)} 04:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You must be kidding Mysekurity, I just woke up! Cheers DaveRight 03:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

Please refrain from making personal attacks, such as "weasly cultsucking bullshit merchants". I realize that may have been meant as humor, however given the rampant hostility on that page, it is best to err on the side of caution with humor right now. I have been asked to monitor for violations of civility on that page. Thanks - KillerChihuahua^?!? 04:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final decision

The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming case. Raul654 01:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA warning

Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you. DaveRight says, "Only with regard to throwing the book at Comaze and other miscreants."[1] Please remove this personal attack from the NLP discussion page. regards, --Comaze 10:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comaze, please post more petty objections. I look forward to expanding upon all the facts you have so desperately fought to censor on the article page. DaveRight 04:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Structure Occult

Dave, you put this "The occult aspects of NLP were always there in the "structure of magic". This is a good comment. Do point out the occult aspects. I really know nothing of it so it will be my first explaination exposure. jVirus File:Confederate Battle Flag.svg 05:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

We can get to that in the article. Lets just say for now that its blindingly obvious. You'd need to read some Aleister Crowley or some similar magick principles books. DaveRight 01:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:46, 8 February 2006 edit JVirus (talk \| contribs) 127 edits Structure Occult ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:37, 9 February 2006 edit undo DaveRight (talk \| contribs) 350 edits →‎Structure Occult Next edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Dave, you put this "The occult aspects of NLP were always there in the "structure of magic". This is a good comment. Do point out the occult aspects. I really know nothing of it so it will be my first explaination exposure. <b><font color="green">j</font><font color="black">Virus</font></b> [[Image:Confederate_Battle_Flag.svg\|16px\|]] 05:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)		Dave, you put this "The occult aspects of NLP were always there in the "structure of magic". This is a good comment. Do point out the occult aspects. I really know nothing of it so it will be my first explaination exposure. <b><font color="green">j</font><font color="black">Virus</font></b> [[Image:Confederate_Battle_Flag.svg\|16px\|]] 05:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

			We can get to that in the article. Lets just say for now that its blindingly obvious. You'd need to read some Aleister Crowley or some similar magick principles books. [[User:DaveRight\|DaveRight]] 01:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)