Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juban's Restaurant (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:09, 4 October 2010

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance, essentially no content, only source is from the website of the restaurant itself. Sven Manguard _Talk 23:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Step 3 of the AfD process was not completed. It has been fixed. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Keep if it can be proven that it was rated one of the "Best New Restaurants in America" by Esquire Magazine.. Bearian (talk) 23:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found an unreliable source that stated the restaurant won the Esquire Restaurant of the Year award in 1983, and I found a possible hit from "The Advocate", the local newspaper, on a Google News Archive search. The article's free summary (the full article was pay-to-view) seemed to indicate that the restaurant won the award in 1984. Narthring (talk • contribs) 18:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per previous AFD nomination. JeremyMcClean (Talk) 01:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The whole thing seems very spammy to me, as if written by the staff. One thing that seems to trip up people on this one is that it's mentioned as one of Esquires "Best New Restaurants" in 1984, but I would advise people to ignoe that after all how many of esquires other "Best New Restaurants" for any year have a wikipedia article?--Deathawk (talk) 04:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very little significant coverage, also sounds a bit of self promotion. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 12:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Since this claim can not be verified, I would agree with delete. 24.97.138.94 (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *'''Delete''': The whole thing seems very spammy to me, as if written by the staff. One thing that seems to trip up people on this one is that it's mentioned as one of Esquires "Best New Restaurants" in 1984, but I would advise people to ignoe that after all how many of esquires other "Best New Restaurants" for any year have a wikipedia article?--[[User:Deathawk|Deathawk]] ([[User talk:Deathawk|talk]]) 04:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Very little significant coverage, also sounds a bit of self promotion. '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 12:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-*Since this claim can not be [[WP:V|verified]], I would go agree with '''delete'''. [[Special:Contributions/24.97.138.94|24.97.138.94]] ([[User talk:24.97.138.94|talk]]) 20:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
+*Since this claim can not be [[WP:V|verified]], I would agree with '''delete'''. [[Special:Contributions/24.97.138.94|24.97.138.94]] ([[User talk:24.97.138.94|talk]]) 20:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)