Talk:Postgenderism: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
neologism? |
reply to Andrewa |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this perhaps an unencyclopedic [[neologism]]? Only [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Postgenderism&btnG=Google+Search&meta=lr%3Dlang_en 26 Google hits], some of them Wikipedia itself. The article has only one significant contributor. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] 05:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC) |
Is this perhaps an unencyclopedic [[neologism]]? Only [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Postgenderism&btnG=Google+Search&meta=lr%3Dlang_en 26 Google hits], some of them Wikipedia itself. The article has only one significant contributor. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] 05:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
A Google search of [http://www.google.ca/search?q=postgender&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official Postgender] reveals more hits, including referrences to academic conferences, as well as cultural and religious aspects. I will suggest that this entry be given more time to attract more attention and other contributors. Moreover, in the context of it being a potential neologism, I wonder if you can suggest another term that enscapsulates this sentiment and burgeoning cultural tendency? [[User:gdvorsky|gdvorsky]] 09:42, 9 February 2006 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 14:46, 9 February 2006
Is this perhaps an unencyclopedic neologism? Only 26 Google hits, some of them Wikipedia itself. The article has only one significant contributor. Andrewa 05:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
A Google search of Postgender reveals more hits, including referrences to academic conferences, as well as cultural and religious aspects. I will suggest that this entry be given more time to attract more attention and other contributors. Moreover, in the context of it being a potential neologism, I wonder if you can suggest another term that enscapsulates this sentiment and burgeoning cultural tendency? gdvorsky 09:42, 9 February 2006 (EST)