Jump to content

User talk:Jayy008: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 59: Line 59:
Okay you well know that wasn't vandalism. So you just straight out embarrassed yourself. Please, lets be mature about this, something you should really take into mind. Want me to give you think for the actual meaning of vandalism? Did you forget what it meant or something? I don't really care. Anyways, what was added is unnecessary. People don't need to know the repeat episodes ratings. No one really cares honestly. C'mon, I thought you were smarter than that. [[User:CloudKade11|CloudKade11]] ([[User talk:CloudKade11|talk]]) 22:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Okay you well know that wasn't vandalism. So you just straight out embarrassed yourself. Please, lets be mature about this, something you should really take into mind. Want me to give you think for the actual meaning of vandalism? Did you forget what it meant or something? I don't really care. Anyways, what was added is unnecessary. People don't need to know the repeat episodes ratings. No one really cares honestly. C'mon, I thought you were smarter than that. [[User:CloudKade11|CloudKade11]] ([[User talk:CloudKade11|talk]]) 22:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
:: By the way if you continue to add it, you will be reported this time for disruptive editing. Please take this into mind, and stop being so immature about all this. All I'm asking is to consider acting like a normal human being for once. Thanks. [[User:CloudKade11|CloudKade11]] ([[User talk:CloudKade11|talk]]) 22:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
:: By the way if you continue to add it, you will be reported this time for disruptive editing. Please take this into mind, and stop being so immature about all this. All I'm asking is to consider acting like a normal human being for once. Thanks. [[User:CloudKade11|CloudKade11]] ([[User talk:CloudKade11|talk]]) 22:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
::: You really need help. Add Gossip Girl's repeat rating and I'll leave 90210's as it is. And if you don't reply I will continue to remove the idiotic detail and if you add it back without consulting me first, you will be reported. [[User:CloudKade11|CloudKade11]] ([[User talk:CloudKade11|talk]]) 05:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


== Mariah Carey ==
== Mariah Carey ==

Revision as of 05:47, 23 October 2010

THIS USER IS CURRENTLY OFFLINE



  • I do not edit often at this time, I mainly reverted potentially controversial edits or vandalism. If you feel I've made an edit that could be considering vandalism of such, please first discuss it with me here before reverting as I wouldn't have made the edit if I didn't feel it was necessary.
  • Please plan to be civil before evening clicking "new section."
  • If you're here to contest something I've said regarding inflation of sales, ratings or anything of the sort, don't bother. From now on I send a warning straight away.

90210

Sorry to change your edits of the first two episodes but the actual number for the two is 4.91 and not 4.65 because if you take the average of all the half hour ratings you get an average of 4.91, which is why the overnight average is also 4.91. This is a warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99hgbh (talkcontribs) 21:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Experience

Sure I'll give it a try :). Gimme a lil while :D--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 00:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think so. I mean the album is in the top 100 in Amazon, and its still 2 weeks away. And in the top 130 in Itunes, and its the highest charting pre-order that is going to be released in November. Remember Christmas albums work very differently than regular albums. Once mid-November hits, Holiday stuff goes wild. Take last year for example, no joke this is what happened. Merry Christmas was in the top-30 in Itunes from mid-November-Christmas, and AIWFCIY was in the top-15 from mid-November until New Years. The day after New Years, I swear Jamie, it fell off the top-100 in one day. Holiday stuff is very drastic, very very drastic. "Oh Santa" will start charting and getting heard after the albums release, like in another month, you'll see, I kept track last year :). Remember, the real holiday stuff doesn't go wild until around 5-6 weeks until Christmas. Whats good is, while the album may have weakish first weak sales (maybe not), it will increase every following weak (happens to everyone, Josh Groban, MC). So it will experience very healthy sales throughout the next 2 months. :D. Just wait and see ;). Also, I just did the book thing. I did the best I could, it looks like mine. Hope thats good enough :)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 21:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your very welcome! :)
BTW, I'm starting Daydream now, and have a lot to write about. For some reason this album has a lot more to write about than the others. Wait till you see this one ;)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 23:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'OTH'

Hey. I've been working on the Brooke Davis article (which I'm hoping can be improved so that it's not redirected) and I saw the recent stir over the One Tree Hill page. I've checked the sources, and the IP edits aren't vandalism. One source just links to the main page of a Website, which doesn't verify the claim about fans (the editor who included it should've found a specific page). The other source linked to a Mark Schwahn interview, which just stated that people were curious about the theme song.

Therefore, the whole "frustrated fans" claim could indeed be construed as fancruft or original research. So I made an edit to restore the previous version. "Montage" is also fine (since "credits" are the screen text). BTW, if anyone plans to work on the Brooke article, let me know. I may want to contribute if you and Flyer are involved. -- James26 (talk) 22:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, concentrate on Nathan first if you'd like. I'm just trying to do a few things here and there. Cheers. -- James26 (talk) 14:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. Just lending a hand to book articles and character pages now and then. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Emancipation of Mimi/Merry Christmas II You

Hi Jamie, well theres a bit of an issue there. It is certified 3x platinum. The thing is the month it was certified in is not available by the CRIA. It was certified 3x P in December, which is unfortunately one of the only months not available. I have an official document the CRIA sent to me personally, if you would like to see it your welcome. Harout uploaded it for me, so you can ask him :). It shows exactly when and everything about her Canadian certifications. It shows how we don't have the right month available for it. Go ask, you'll see, he uploaded it for me :)

Also, I have a surprise for you. We heard 2 snippets of 2 songs (Little Drummer Boy/O Come All Ye Faithful) and (The First Noel/Born is the King) when Mariah was on HSN today. Here is "The First Noel" snippet and here is the "O Come All Ye Faithful" snippet. All I'm gonna say is amazing and very unexpected. Her vocals are the best since TOM, wait till you hear this! :)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 21:14, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, its really exciting!
Yes as I told you, Harout uploaded it for me :p
He must have seen the ordeal on the article page. Hehehe, nothing gets by him! :)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 12:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hahhaha yup! I ordered mine already :)
Yes, I thought that too, I mean how hard could it be to fix a damn site! I have friends that make them on their own in like 2 months lol.--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 12:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I just completely re-did Daydream :), go take a look. I think you should get started on "Can't Take That Away" or something :P--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 09:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry, I have no idea how I accidentally reverted edits on your page. I was typing, and thought I was in the search box. All of a sudden my screen said "Action completed" and I was thinking, "what action?" My greatest apologies, it was a complete accident. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 12:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see anything wrong :S, lol. Jayy008 (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

90210

Okay you well know that wasn't vandalism. So you just straight out embarrassed yourself. Please, lets be mature about this, something you should really take into mind. Want me to give you think for the actual meaning of vandalism? Did you forget what it meant or something? I don't really care. Anyways, what was added is unnecessary. People don't need to know the repeat episodes ratings. No one really cares honestly. C'mon, I thought you were smarter than that. CloudKade11 (talk) 22:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way if you continue to add it, you will be reported this time for disruptive editing. Please take this into mind, and stop being so immature about all this. All I'm asking is to consider acting like a normal human being for once. Thanks. CloudKade11 (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You really need help. Add Gossip Girl's repeat rating and I'll leave 90210's as it is. And if you don't reply I will continue to remove the idiotic detail and if you add it back without consulting me first, you will be reported. CloudKade11 (talk) 05:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey

Hello, the article was promoted to FA long time ago (2006). There have been many changes in FA styles since. (I believe Mariah Carey article has possibility to lost its current star if we go to reassessment). You can take a look to recent FAs (like (Madonna, Janet Jackson, David Bowie), they only list studio albums, other releases can go to discography articles. See Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Music_biography for comparison. MaterialGirl77 (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]