User talk:Marturius: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kwamikagami (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There are legal arguments as to whether the Caspian is a "lake" or an "enclosed sea"; if the later, the [[Law of the Sea]] applies, which would be disadvantageous to Russia, so Russia argues it's a "lake" and Kazakhstan argues it's a "sea". — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 10:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
There are legal arguments as to whether the Caspian is a "lake" or an "enclosed sea"; if the later, the [[Law of the Sea]] applies, which would be disadvantageous to Russia, so Russia argues it's a "lake" and Kazakhstan argues it's a "sea". — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 10:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
:OK. I respect simple rule in physical geography and oceanography that oceans and seas must be connected with the world ocean. I don't understand why this rule can be a problem. Let's do things as simple (and apt) as possible and we avoid disputes!!! --[[User:Marturius|Marturius]] ([[User talk:Marturius#top|talk]]) 11:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:38, 27 October 2010
Lake
Please take it to talk per WP:Bold rather than edit warring. The Caspian is a "sea"; it's also a geological ocean. The def. in the article might need to be adjusted if we can ref it. — kwami (talk) 10:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
There are legal arguments as to whether the Caspian is a "lake" or an "enclosed sea"; if the later, the Law of the Sea applies, which would be disadvantageous to Russia, so Russia argues it's a "lake" and Kazakhstan argues it's a "sea". — kwami (talk) 10:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)