Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMLC Group: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Mitchronson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete'''. I don't think notability is proven here. There are some quotes by employees in various reliable sources, however according to [[WP:RS]] that does not constitute significant coverage. -[[User:Addionne|Addionne]] ([[User talk:Addionne|talk]]) 19:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. I don't think notability is proven here. There are some quotes by employees in various reliable sources, however according to [[WP:RS]] that does not constitute significant coverage. -[[User:Addionne|Addionne]] ([[User talk:Addionne|talk]]) 19:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. I ran a google search and found around one hundred entries from objective sources referring to this company, including news items from major publications not just the New York Times. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.215.211.173|121.215.211.173]] ([[User talk:121.215.211.173|talk]]) 22:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
*'''Keep'''. I ran a google search and found around one hundred entries from objective sources referring to this company, including news items from major publications not just the New York Times. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.215.211.173|121.215.211.173]] ([[User talk:121.215.211.173|talk]]) 22:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
*'''Keep'''. The comment about this being spammy is laughable. If you do proper searches you will see this firm is major. |
|||
Revision as of 02:32, 30 October 2010
- MMLC Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Weak notability, at best, spammy. PROD'ed but IP editor with edits to no other article removed nom and issue tags. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't think notability is proven here. There are some quotes by employees in various reliable sources, however according to WP:RS that does not constitute significant coverage. -Addionne (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. I ran a google search and found around one hundred entries from objective sources referring to this company, including news items from major publications not just the New York Times. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.215.211.173 (talk) 22:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. The comment about this being spammy is laughable. If you do proper searches you will see this firm is major.