Miracle of the Sun: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 394681585 by 92.0.206.173 (talk) That's what Jaki says |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Professor Auguste Meessen of the Institute of Physics, [[Catholic University of Leuven]], has stated sun miracles cannot be taken a face value and that the reported observations were optical effects caused by prolonged staring at the sun. Meessen contends that retinal after-images produced after brief periods of sun gazing are a likely cause of the observed dancing effects. Similarly Meessen states that the colour changes witnessed were most likely caused by the bleaching of photosensitive retinal cells.<ref name="ReferenceA">Auguste Meessen 'Apparitions and Miracles of the Sun' International Forum in Porto "Science, Religion and Conscience" October 23–25, 2003 ISSN: 1645-6564</ref> Meessen observes that Sun Miracles have been witnessed in many places where religiously charged pilgrims have been encouraged to stare at the sun. He cites the apparitions at Heroldsbach, Germany (1949) as an example, where similar observations as at Fatima were witnessed by more than 10,000 people.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Meessen also cites a [[British Journal of Ophthalmology]] article that discusses some modern examples of Sun Miracles.<ref> Solar retinopathy following religious rituals. M Hope-Ross,S Travers,D Mooney; Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:931-934 doi:10.1136/bjo.72.12.931 [http://bjo.bmj.com/content/72/12/931.abstract] </ref> While Meessen suggests possible pychological or neurological explanations for the apparitions he notes, "It is impossible to provide any direct evidence for or against the supernatural origin of apparitions". <ref name="ReferenceA"/> He also notes that "[t]here may be some exceptions, but in general, the seers are honestly experiencing |
Professor Auguste Meessen of the Institute of Physics, [[Catholic University of Leuven]], has stated sun miracles cannot be taken a face value and that the reported observations were optical effects caused by prolonged staring at the sun. Meessen contends that retinal after-images produced after brief periods of sun gazing are a likely cause of the observed dancing effects. Similarly Meessen states that the colour changes witnessed were most likely caused by the bleaching of photosensitive retinal cells.<ref name="ReferenceA">Auguste Meessen 'Apparitions and Miracles of the Sun' International Forum in Porto "Science, Religion and Conscience" October 23–25, 2003 ISSN: 1645-6564</ref> Meessen observes that Sun Miracles have been witnessed in many places where religiously charged pilgrims have been encouraged to stare at the sun. He cites the apparitions at Heroldsbach, Germany (1949) as an example, where similar observations as at Fatima were witnessed by more than 10,000 people.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Meessen also cites a [[British Journal of Ophthalmology]] article that discusses some modern examples of Sun Miracles.<ref> Solar retinopathy following religious rituals. M Hope-Ross,S Travers,D Mooney; Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:931-934 doi:10.1136/bjo.72.12.931 [http://bjo.bmj.com/content/72/12/931.abstract] </ref> While Meessen suggests possible pychological or neurological explanations for the apparitions he notes, "It is impossible to provide any direct evidence for or against the supernatural origin of apparitions". <ref name="ReferenceA"/> He also notes that "[t]here may be some exceptions, but in general, the seers are honestly experiencing |
||
what they report." <ref name="ReferenceA"/> |
|||
what they report." <ref name="ReferenceA"/> While Meessen posits a natural explanation for the miracle, his conclusions are consistent with that of the physicist, Jaki (below), that while the events witnessed may have a natural explanation, they may be miraculess nonetheles. |
|||
De Marchi claims that the prediction of an unspecified "miracle", the abrupt beginning and end of the alleged miracle of the sun, the varied religious backgrounds of the observers, the sheer numbers of people present, and the lack of any known scientific causative factor make a [[mass hallucination]] unlikely.<ref name = "DeMarchib 150, 278–82">(De Marchi 1952b:150, 278–82)</ref> That the activity of the sun was reported as visible by those up to {{convert|18|km|mi}} away, also precludes the theory of a collective hallucination or [[mass hysteria]].<ref name = "DeMarchib 150, 278–82" /> |
De Marchi claims that the prediction of an unspecified "miracle", the abrupt beginning and end of the alleged miracle of the sun, the varied religious backgrounds of the observers, the sheer numbers of people present, and the lack of any known scientific causative factor make a [[mass hallucination]] unlikely.<ref name = "DeMarchib 150, 278–82">(De Marchi 1952b:150, 278–82)</ref> That the activity of the sun was reported as visible by those up to {{convert|18|km|mi}} away, also precludes the theory of a collective hallucination or [[mass hysteria]].<ref name = "DeMarchib 150, 278–82" /> |
Revision as of 01:34, 5 November 2010
The Miracle of the Sun (Portuguese: O Milagre do Sol) is a supposedly miraculous event witnessed by 30,000 to 100,000 people on 13 October 1917 in the Cova da Iria fields near Fátima, Portugal. Those in attendance had assembled to observe what the Portuguese secular newspapers had been ridiculing for months as the absurd claim of three shepherd children that a miracle was going to occur at high-noon in the Cova da Iria on 13 October 1917.[1]
According to many witness statements, after a downfall of rain, the dark clouds broke and the sun appeared as an opaque, spinning disc in the sky.[2] It was said to be significantly duller than normal, and to cast multicolored lights across the landscape, the shadows on the landscape, the people, and the surrounding clouds.[2] The sun was then reported to have careened towards the earth in a zigzag pattern,[2] frightening some of those present who thought it meant the end of the world.[3] Witnesses reported that their previously wet clothes became "suddenly and completely dry, as well as the wet and muddy ground that had been previously soaked because of the rain that had been falling. Engineers that have studied the case reckoned that an incredible amount of energy would have been necessary to dry up that pools of water that had formed on the field in a few minutes as it was reported by witnesses."[4]
Estimates of the number of witnesses range from 30,000 to 40,000 by Avelino de Almeida, writing for the Portuguese newspaper O Século,[5] to 100,000, estimated by Dr. Joseph Garrett, professor of natural sciences at the University of Coimbra,[6] both of whom were present that day.[7]
The event was attributed by believers to Our Lady of Fátima, an apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary to three young shepherd children in 1917, as having been predicted by the three children on 13 July,[8] 19 August,[9] and 13 September[10] 1917. The children reported that the Lady had promised them that she would on 13 October reveal her identity to them[11] and provide a miracle "so that all may believe."[12]
According to these reports, the event lasted approximately ten minutes.[13] The three children also reported seeing a panorama of visions, including those of Jesus, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and of Saint Joseph blessing the people.[14]
Doubts from skeptics have been raised about the uniqueness and causes of the event.
Descriptions
The most widely cited descriptions of the events reported at Fatima are taken from the writings of John De Marchi, an Italian Catholic priest and researcher. De Marchi spent seven years in Fátima, from 1943 to 1950, conducting original research and interviewing the principals at undisturbed length.[15] In The Immaculate Heart, published in 1952, De Marchi reports that, "[t]heir ranks (those present on 13 October) included believers and non-believers, pious old ladies and scoffing young men. Hundreds, from these mixed categories, have given formal testimony. Reports do vary; impressions are in minor details confused, but none to our knowledge has directly denied the visible prodigy of the sun."[16]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/91/Newspaper_fatima_353.jpg/294px-Newspaper_fatima_353.jpg)
Some of the witness statements follow below. They are taken from John De Marchi's several books on the matter.
- "Before the astonished eyes of the crowd, whose aspect was biblical as they stood bare-headed, eagerly searching the sky, the sun trembled, made sudden incredible movements outside all cosmic laws — the sun 'danced' according to the typical expression of the people." ― Avelino de Almeida,[17] writing for O Século (Portugal's most widely circulated[18] and influential newspaper, which was pro-government and anti-clerical at the time[17] Almeida's previous articles had been to satirize the previously reported events at Fátima).[5]
- "The sun, at one moment surrounded with scarlet flame, at another aureoled in yellow and deep purple, seemed to be in an exceedingly swift and whirling movement, at times appearing to be loosened from the sky and to be approaching the earth, strongly radiating heat." ― Dr. Domingos Pinto Coelho, writing for the newspaper Ordem.[19]
- "...The silver sun, enveloped in the same gauzy grey light, was seen to whirl and turn in the circle of broken clouds... The light turned a beautiful blue, as if it had come through the stained-glass windows of a cathedral, and spread itself over the people who knelt with outstretched hands... people wept and prayed with uncovered heads, in the presence of a miracle they had awaited. The seconds seemed like hours, so vivid were they." ― Reporter for the Lisbon newspaper O Dia.[16]
- "The sun's disc did not remain immobile. This was not the sparkling of a heavenly body, for it spun round on itself in a mad whirl, when suddenly a clamor was heard from all the people. The sun, whirling, seemed to loosen itself from the firmament and advance threateningly upon the earth as if to crush us with its huge fiery weight. The sensation during those moments was terrible." — Dr. Almeida Garrett, Professor of Natural Sciences at Coimbra University.[20]
- "As if like a bolt from the blue, the clouds were wrenched apart, and the sun at its zenith appeared in all its splendor. It began to revolve vertiginously on its axis, like the most magnificent firewheel that could be imagined, taking on all the colors of the rainbow and sending forth multicolored flashes of light, producing the most astounding effect. This sublime and incomparable spectacle, which was repeated three distinct times, lasted for about ten minutes. The immense multitude, overcome by the evidence of such a tremendous prodigy, threw themselves on their knees." ― Dr. Formigão, a professor at the seminary at Santarém, and a priest.[20]
- "I feel incapable of describing what I saw. I looked fixedly at the sun, which seemed pale and did not hurt my eyes. Looking like a ball of snow, revolving on itself, it suddenly seemed to come down in a zig-zag, menacing the earth. Terrified, I ran and hid myself among the people, who were weeping and expecting the end of the world at any moment." — Rev. Joaquim Lourenço, describing his boyhood experience in Alburitel, eighteen kilometers from Fatima.[21]
- "On that day of October 13, 1917, without remembering the predictions of the children, I was enchanted by a remarkable spectacle in the sky of a kind I had never seen before. I saw it from this veranda..." — Portuguese poet Afonso Lopes Vieira.[22]
Critical evaluation of the event
Joe Nickell notes "Not surprisingly, perhaps, Sun Miracles have been reported at other Marian sites—at Lubbock, Texas, in 1989; Mother Cabrini Shrine near Denver, Colorado, in 1992; Conyers, Georgia, in the early to mid-1990s"[23] Nickell also suggests that the dancing effects witnessed at Fatima may have been due to optical effects resulting from temporary retinal distortion caused by staring at such an intense light.[23]
Professor Auguste Meessen of the Institute of Physics, Catholic University of Leuven, has stated sun miracles cannot be taken a face value and that the reported observations were optical effects caused by prolonged staring at the sun. Meessen contends that retinal after-images produced after brief periods of sun gazing are a likely cause of the observed dancing effects. Similarly Meessen states that the colour changes witnessed were most likely caused by the bleaching of photosensitive retinal cells.[24] Meessen observes that Sun Miracles have been witnessed in many places where religiously charged pilgrims have been encouraged to stare at the sun. He cites the apparitions at Heroldsbach, Germany (1949) as an example, where similar observations as at Fatima were witnessed by more than 10,000 people.[24] Meessen also cites a British Journal of Ophthalmology article that discusses some modern examples of Sun Miracles.[25] While Meessen suggests possible pychological or neurological explanations for the apparitions he notes, "It is impossible to provide any direct evidence for or against the supernatural origin of apparitions". [24] He also notes that "[t]here may be some exceptions, but in general, the seers are honestly experiencing what they report." [24]
De Marchi claims that the prediction of an unspecified "miracle", the abrupt beginning and end of the alleged miracle of the sun, the varied religious backgrounds of the observers, the sheer numbers of people present, and the lack of any known scientific causative factor make a mass hallucination unlikely.[26] That the activity of the sun was reported as visible by those up to 18 kilometres (11 mi) away, also precludes the theory of a collective hallucination or mass hysteria.[26]
Despite these assertions, not all witnesses reported seeing the sun "dance". Some people only saw the radiant colors. Others, including some believers, saw nothing at all.[27][28] No scientific accounts exist of any unusual solar or astronomic activity during the time the sun was reported to have "danced", and there are no witness reports of any unusual solar phenomenon further than 64 kilometres (40 mi) out from Cova da Iria.[29]
Pio Scatizzi, S.J. describes events of Fátima and concludes:
The ... solar phenomena were not observed in any observatory. Impossible that they should escape notice of so many astronomers and indeed the other inhabitants of the hemisphere... there is no question of an astronomical or meteorological event phenomenon... Either all the observers in Fátima were collectively deceived and erred in their testimony, or we must suppose an extra-natural intervention.[30]
Steuart Campbell, writing for the 1989 edition of Journal of Meteorology, postulated that a cloud of stratospheric dust changed the appearance of the sun on 13 October, making it easy to look at, and causing it to appear yellow, blue, and violet and to spin. In support of his hypothesis, Mr. Campbell reports that a blue and reddened sun was reported in China as documented in 1983.[31]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Parhelion_2005_close.jpg/220px-Parhelion_2005_close.jpg)
Joe Nickell, a skeptic and investigator of paranormal phenomena (who is not a scientist), claims that the position of the phenomenon, as described by the various witnesses, is at the wrong azimuth and elevation to have been the sun.[32] He suggests the cause may have been a sundog. Sometimes referred to as a parhelion or "mock sun", a sundog is a relatively common atmospheric optical phenomenon associated with the reflection/refraction of sunlight by the numerous small ice crystals that make up cirrus or cirrostratus clouds. A sundog is, however, a stationary phenomenon, and would not explain the reported appearance of the "dancing sun".
Paul Simons, in an article entitled "Weather Secrets of Miracle at Fátima", states that he believes it possible that some of the optical effects at Fatima may have been caused by a cloud of dust from the Sahara.[33]
Kevin McClure claims that the crowd at Cova da Iria may have been expecting to see signs in the sun, as similar phenomena had been reported in the weeks leading up to the miracle. On this basis he believes that the crowd saw what it wanted to see. But it has been objected that McClure's account fails to explain similar reports of people miles away, who by their own testimony were not even thinking of the event at the time, or the sudden drying of people's sodden, rain-soaked clothes. Kevin McClure stated that he had never seen such a collection of contradictory accounts of a case in any of the research he had done in the previous ten years, although he has not explicitly stated what these contradictions were.[34]
Leo Madigan believes that the various witness reports of a miracle are accurate; however he alleges inconsistency of witnesses, and suggests that astonishment, fear, exaltation and imagination must have played roles in both the observing and the retelling. Madigan likens the experiences to prayer, and considers that the spiritual nature of the phenomenon explains what he describes as the inconsistency of the witnesses.[35]
John Haffert, founder of the Blue Army of Our Lady of Fatima, explains the event as a vision of the Great Chastisement. The 200 witnesses he interviewed while researching his book Meet The Witnesses reported similar descriptions of the sun careening towards the earth and a sense of the end of the world. He compares this description to a recognized vision of Our Lady of Akita on October 13, 1973 to Sister Agnes Katsuko Sasagawa in Akita, Japan, in which she recorded:
As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will never have seen before. Fire will fall from the sky and will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well as the bad, sparing neither priests nor faithful.[36]
Author Lisa Schwebel claims that the event was a supernatural extra-sensory phenomenon. Schwebel notes that the solar phenomenon reported at Fátima is not unique: there have been several reported cases of high pitched religious gatherings culminating in the sudden and mysterious appearance of lights in the sky.[37]
Stanley L. Jaki, a professor of physics at Seton Hall University, New Jersey, Benedictine priest and author of a number of books dealing with the intersection of science and faith, proposed a unique theory about the supposed miracle.[28] Jaki believes that the event was natural and meteorological in nature, but that the fact the event occurred at the exact time predicted was a miracle.[28]
The event was officially accepted as a miracle by the Roman Catholic Church on 13 October 1930. On 13 October 1951, papal legate Cardinal Tedeschini told the million gathered at Fátima that on 30 October, 31 October, 1 November, and 8 November 1950, Pope Pius XII himself witnessed the miracle of the sun from the Vatican gardens.[38]
See also
References
- ^ (De Marchi 1952a:130–131)
- ^ a b c (De Marchi 1952b:139–150)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:143, 149)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:150)
- ^ a b (De Marchi 1952a)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952a:177)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952a:185–187)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:74)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:107)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:118)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:46)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952:118)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:151–166)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:10–12)
- ^ a b (De Marchi 1952b:143)
- ^ a b (De Marchi 1952b:144)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952a:174)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:147)
- ^ a b (De Marchi 1952b:146)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:149)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:148–9)
- ^ a b Skeptical Inquirer — Volume 33.6 November / December 2009
- ^ a b c d Auguste Meessen 'Apparitions and Miracles of the Sun' International Forum in Porto "Science, Religion and Conscience" October 23–25, 2003 ISSN: 1645-6564
- ^ Solar retinopathy following religious rituals. M Hope-Ross,S Travers,D Mooney; Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:931-934 doi:10.1136/bjo.72.12.931 [1]
- ^ a b (De Marchi 1952b:150, 278–82)
- ^ Basilica and Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima
- ^ a b c Jaki, Stanley L. (1999). God and the Sun at Fátima. Real View Books, ASIN B0006R7UJ6
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:148–50, 282)
- ^ (De Marchi 1952b:282)
- ^ "Fátima's dusty veil", New Humanist, Vol 104 No 2, August 1989 and "The Miracle of the Sun at Fátima", Journal of Meteorology, UK, Vol 14, no. 142, October, 1989
- ^ Joe Nickell (1993) Looking for a Miracle: Weeping Icons, Relics, Stigmata, Visions and Healing Cures Prometheus, ISBN 0-87975-840-6
- ^ "Weather Secrets of Miracle at Fátima", Paul Simons, The Times, February 17, 2005.
- ^ Kevin McClure (1983) The Evidence for Visions of the Virgin Mary Aquarian Press, ISBN 0-85030-351-6
- ^ Leo Madigan (2003), The Children of Fátima Our Sunday Visitor Inc., ISBN 1-931709-57-2
- ^ "Sister Agnes Katsuko Sasagawa". Akita Japan. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
- ^ Lisa J Schwebel (2003) Apparitions, Healings, and Weeping Madonnas: Christianity and the Paranormal Paulist Press, ISBN 0-8091-4223-6 (see the American Manazine review).
- ^ Joseph Pelletier. (1983). The Sun Danced at Fátima. Doubleday, New York. p. 147–151.
Bibliography
- De Marchi, John (1956). The True Story of Fátima. St. Paul Minnesota: Catechetical Guild Educational Society.
- De Marchi, John (1952b). The Immaculate Heart. New York: Farrar, Straus and Young.
External links
- Newspaper article in Portuguese that came out shortly after the miracle.
- Pictures of the crowd from, "Fatima Portugal Our Lady of Fatima"
- Picture of the sun during the alleged miracle.
- "The True Story of Fatima" by John De Marchi
- Our Lady of Fatima Statuary
- Miracle of the Sun in Medjugorje
- Apparitions and Miracles of the Sun
- John Haffert speaks about Fatima and his book Meet the Witnesses (MP3)
- Discover magazine article on sun miracles
- BBC News article on sun miracles at Knock
- Our Lady of the Sun