User talk:Dana60Cummins

There is a serious lack of info on all things mechanical. I would have thought by now the internet would have been loaded with information on Axles, Engines, Transmission, Turbo Chargers, Superchargers, Diesels, Injection Pumps, Fuel injectors, etc. but there is almost nothing. I will try to do my part and help important information spread like wildfire. I do know at the end of the day, I won't even putting a dent in the lack of info, that plagues the internet.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Reply to above statement

I haven't really noticed that there is not that much info on the world wide web. But remember, even though your not helping, any little bit of new info helps! :)Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 19:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

How am I not helping?--Dana60Cummins (talk) 19:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, mistype

I haven't really noticed that there is not that much info on the world wide web. But remember, even though your not helping, any little bit of new info helps! :)Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 19:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)"

lol Ment to say I haven't really noticed that there is not that much info on the world wide web. But remember, even though your adding small pieces of info to the web, any little bit of new info helps! --Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 13:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Locked Differential

Your change to revert my edits was unconstructive. Please look at the description in the discussion page in Locking Differential under the sub-heading LSD Left/Right Function.121.218.77.253 (talk) 22:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

124.183.92.167

I don't understand where User talk:124.183.92.167 is coming from. User talk:124.183.92.167 and User talk:124.183.92.167 also made contributions to Locking differential in the same fashion. Talking about "Torques" and what-not. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 06:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I have also started: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/121.218.77.253 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dana60Cummins (talk • contribs) 15:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm also baffled by some of the stuff this person is adding, and their persistence in reinserting their errors. RB30DE (talk) 07:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

User talk:124.183.92.167 and User talk:124.183.92.167 and User talk:124.183.92.167 stopped editing all at the same time.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

SRW Fords

Apparently in 2005, an F350 with single rear wheels had a GVWR of 10,600 or greater, typically it was 11,500 lbs. The previous year it was 9,900 lbs. and I believe the same was true in previous years to 2004 back to probably the 98 or so. I am guessing that all new F350s are will be Class 3 from 2005 on up. See http://www.fordf150.net/specs/05sd_specs.pdf It's hard to put all of that in the Truck classification article.

Note also that the F250 was at 10,000 lbs. for the diesel, so the F250 will likely "cross over" to "medium duty truck" at some point, too. I like to saw logs! (talk) 08:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

What about the Ton rating section? I'll brainstorm about that for awhile. It might be while, 2010 maybe, until I add something about that in there.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

RE: Your tagline on my guestbook

Yep, I love 'em both. But alltime, my two main favorite bands are Tool and Underoath. • GunMetal Angel 00:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback:dotKuro

Hello, Dana60Cummins. You have new messages at DotKuro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Thank You

I guess I'm just naturally gifted. Well, either that, or I happened to be looking at the Recent Changes page at the time. You decide :) Anaxial (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

DieselThis is a Banana

Proposed rename/move of Medical cannabis

Hi! I wonder whether you'd be willing to revisit the move request discussion you participated in for the article that's currently named "Medical Cannabis"? Just a day or two ago I came across a naming policy statement that I imagine none of us who have participated in the discussion and !voting so far knew of previously. I certainly didn't know of it. The policy can be found at WP:UCN, and it appears to prohibit the proposal from being adopted. I'd be grateful if you'd have a look at it, and if you agree then perhaps you'd change your !vote in the discussion? No hard feelings, of course, if you disagree that the policy applies or must be adhered to. But I did want to let you know of it, and invite your further participation in the move-request discussion. Please note, by the way, that this request to reconsider, in light of the policy, doesn't constitute improper canvassing since I'm sending it to everyone who has !voted on the proposal. Best,  – OhioStandard (talk) 12:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Edits to EGR Article

I understand your perspective on the EGR article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaust_gas_recirculation ) but your continued reverts to the section aren't helping enhance the clarity on EGR removal. Obviously you feel that EGR doesn't have a place on an engine, whereas there are several other editors trying to clarify the pros/cons of EGR yet you revert any changes to the section. Use the discussion page for the article to dispute the article section before completely reverting sections. You can't present your thoughts on a subject without adequate justification through citations/inline references. There are many resources out there specific to the effects of EGR on an engine, citing two generic books on engine repair probably isn't the best source of information.Waterppk (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC) please see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources before makeing more changes or reverts to the section as everything on Wikipedia must be properly referenced. Kateweb (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

"Obviously you feel that EGR doesn't have a place on an engine" - You Incorrect. Never once did say anything like this.

"There are many resources out there specific to the effects of EGR on an engine" Incorrect. Not only is it incorrect, web searches bring up mostly articles on how to delete diesel EGR, by pass, etc.

I saw the source you added...I'm surprised to see you removed "wear-inducing contaminants" When is acid not wear-inducing in a engine?

I have not even touched what Diesel EGR does to power or fuel economy. What do you think it does for power and fuel economy?--Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

More on the EGR talk page.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Semen

I loved your edit summary, it really made me smile. I just had to see who did it, and as it turns out, I suspect it was a bit of a mistake on the author (User:Preslethe), as he actually typed {{fact}} - maybe he was trying to emphasise that it was a fact. Anyway, along comes SmackBot and changes it to a "citation needed"... Still well spotted, as it had been then since February, and no one else noticed.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

GT5 locked?

Hi there, the article for Gran Turismo 5 appears to be locked, and nobody on the talk page is paying any notice at all. This looks to be one of the biggest videogames of the year, and there is lots lacking in the article - any chance you could do something to get it editable again?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.22.71 (talk) 20:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Already got a solution do your problem on your talk page. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 07:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

A statement

I have learned for myself that your beliefs are not true.