Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Laptopmaker: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Laptopmaker (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
#::I have answered the questions now, please re-consider. I have seen users in the past 2002 get it with less than 50 edits. '''[[User:Laptopmaker|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Laptopmaker|<font color="057602">''Laptopmaker''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Laptopmaker|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 18:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
#::I have answered the questions now, please re-consider. I have seen users in the past 2002 get it with less than 50 edits. '''[[User:Laptopmaker|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Laptopmaker|<font color="057602">''Laptopmaker''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Laptopmaker|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 18:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
#'''Oppose.''' Please close per WP:SNOW. [[User:Saebvn|Saebvn]] ([[User talk:Saebvn|talk]]) 18:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
#'''Oppose.''' Please close per WP:SNOW. [[User:Saebvn|Saebvn]] ([[User talk:Saebvn|talk]]) 18:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
#:You should read up on policy, you can't close because of SNOW. You have to let me prove myself. '''[[User:Laptopmaker|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Laptopmaker|<font color="057602">''Laptopmaker''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Laptopmaker|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 18:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=====Neutral===== |
=====Neutral===== |
||
Revision as of 18:52, 10 December 2010
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (0/2/0); Scheduled to end 18:35, 17 December, 2010
Nomination
Laptopmaker (talk · contribs) – Would like to help out, think I deserve the tools. thanksLaptopmaker (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Laptopmaker (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: All of them are great
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: People have yeelled at me before.
General comments
- Links for Laptopmaker: Laptopmaker (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Laptopmaker can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
- No evidence of helpful contributions; no answers even to the basic 3 questions. Apart from certain exceptional cases which are well-explained beforehand a user with 26 edits should not be running for adminship. The average edit count of a Wikipedia administrator is somewhere around 20,000. Many have passed with less, some with much less, but all of them have had significant experience that has convinced users to ignore the low edit count. —Soap— 18:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have answered the questions now, please re-consider. I have seen users in the past 2002 get it with less than 50 edits. —Laptopmaker— 18:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Please close per WP:SNOW. Saebvn (talk) 18:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- You should read up on policy, you can't close because of SNOW. You have to let me prove myself. —Laptopmaker— 18:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)