User talk:FisherQueen

FisherQueen User Page · Talk page · Archives · Sandbox · Patrol · Templates

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 3#Valeri Lilov Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeri Lilov (2nd nomination), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 3#Valeri Lilov. Cunard (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC) The Signpost: 6 December 2010 News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive In the news: Amazon "shopping-enabling" Wikipedia; Al Jazeera interview; be like Wikipedia GLAM-WIKI London: British Museum hosts two days of talks between Wikimedia and the cultural sector WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup Features and admins: Birds and insects Arbitration report: New case: World War II Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Note Note that I use endless IP's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.148.30.73 (talk) 13:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC) I guess you'll just have to respect your block the old-fashioned way, then, through self-restraint. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Concern Did I do something wrong? Tiderolls 03:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC) No, I did. I declined it as a simple and obvious legal threat. Then I saw your comment saying that there was a good case for unblocking, realized there must be more than I was seeing, and, since I wanted to go to sleep, not stay up and look into it more closely, I undid myself to let someone else think about it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the explanation. To clarify; my post there was more of sympathy for someone that perceived they were in a catch-22, not a support of their position. They did not offer a retraction at that point and the Foundation had not replied to my e-mail so, in my opinion, unblocking was not indicated. I was open to other opinions, though. Just a bit of "new admin angst". See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC) If you get a chance... Hi FisherQueen if you can spare a few minutes I'd appreciate your input on this[1].--Cailil talk 22:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC) I favor topic-banning everyone from the subject of the preferred terminology of the British Isles/England/Great Britain/Wales/Ireland/Eire/Northern Ireland/Londonderry/Derry/Etc]]. I propose that from now on, we just call the whole damned pair of islands "Those Fucking Islands Over There." -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Support. WP:TFIOT for short. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC) LOL I understand and agree TBH. But seriously I'm stuck with a serious 'zombie issue' this thread keeps dying on ANi and the problem keeps coming back. The account isn't changing behaviour and ANi is, understandibly sick of hearing about teh British Isles.--Cailil talk 03:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC) Just call them a bunch of Poms. That's what we do. Sorted. Uncensored Kiwi Kiss 14:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC) Advice re Delicious carbuncle Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) At ANI, BLPN, NPOVN, WT:SCN, and multiple other locations, this user is abusing forumshopping and attempting to game the system in retaliation for my reporting the user to ANI over the user's BLP violations and the user's disruption on the topic of WP:ARBSCI with those selfsame BLP violations. What can be done about this? Should the user be reported for forumshopping-disruption related to WP:ARBSCI? Multiple users have commented that the user's counter-claims have little merit. ARBSCI notice [2] BLP violations [3] Gaming and forumshopping [4] Thoughts??? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 21:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC) I think there's already a thread about it at ANI. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC) The thread about ANI has turned into a forum for Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs) to attack me, a tactic used by the user to deflect attention away from his earlier BLP violations. There is no thread about his forum-shopping across multiple pages, is there? -- Cirt (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC) In that ANI thread I brought up my concerns about several articles, some of which had BLP issues. I left a note at the BLPN noticeboard directing people to the ANI thread so that those issues could be addressed, but I saw that they were not, so, as suggested to me in that ANI thread, I opened discussions at the BLP noticeboard. I have taken care to outline my concerns as neutrally as possible, without naming any editors at all. I do not understand why Cirt would object to people looking at possible BLP issues. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC) DC, I'm not really interested in refereeing this particular game, but it's pretty clear to me that you're about six inches from an indefinite block for POV-pushing related to Scientology. If you aren't here at wikipedia mainly to advance Scientology, it would be a really swell idea to back way off of that subject and write about something else for a while. I'm not doing anything but saying that much tonight, because I don't generally block when I've had quite as much wine as this. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC) FisherQueen, in multiple cases, Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs) failed to even attempt any prior discussion at the articles' talk pages about these issues. The user went straight to escalating the issue, in many different instances. -- Cirt (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)