User talk:MuZemike

Or: The War Room

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

Ground rules Post at the bottom of the page. Sign your comments at the end with four tildes (~~~~), which automatically generates your username and date posted. I will respond to queries here, so please watch this page. Be nice and chances are I will be nice back.

Happy Thanksgiving Neutralhomer wishes you a Happy Thanksgiving and hopes your day is full of good times, good food, good family, good football, a good parade and a good nap...then shopping tomorrow. :) Have a Great Day! :) Spread the joy of Thanksgiving by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/HappyThanksgiving}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Vandalism Hi there MIKE, VASCO from Portugal here, for reasons that escape me, vandalism has been afoot at Simão Sabrosa and Manuel Fernandes (footballer born 1986), with English "user" inserting players play with one team when they DON'T (last time i checked it was vandalism). The past few days, some more "users" have been inserting stuff (at least in the latter article), which included obscenities. Can you please offer the poor Fernandes and Sabrosa some wiki-solace? Thanks in advance, have a nice week, keep it up - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC) P.S. Another "user" (could very well be the same, anon IP is also from England) has started the same rubbish, now in Hugo Almeida. Please don't doubt my judgements, it IS vandalism, inserting lies in articles is vandalism, even if the language is proper. Another admin already semi-protected the other two articles, I got the Hugo Almeida article. –MuZemike 19:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC) Talkback Hello, MuZemike. You have new messages at Humor Guy's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. He admits his socking and wants to talk with you about it. Gigs (talk) 20:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC) Semi-protection You semi-protected Ferdowsi millenary celebration in Berlin because of excessive vandalism. The same person is edit-warring in Rezā Shāh using different IPs. That page should be semi-protected too. Alefbe (talk) 01:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC) I'm going to try two rangeblocks on the two IP ranges involved, as they seem isolated enough to place them. –MuZemike 01:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC) talkback Hello, MuZemike. You have new messages at Humor Guy's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Says he agrees.--SPhilbrickT 21:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Wants another look. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 23:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Kag I believe VanityFaresssss (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) maybe a sock-puppet of Kagome_85 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) I just think someone should check it out just to make sure. Thanks 142.163.146.217 (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2010 (UTC)  Confirmed and blocked. Thank you for letting me know. –MuZemike 23:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Mu, can you also block the IP that left you this warning? They're Kagome 85's ex, and have already been indef blocked under a different name for their harassment of their ex.— Dædαlus+ Contribs 23:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Wait a minute, why would a user report his or her own socks? –MuZemike 23:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Wanted to fess up? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Doesn't really matter; they both live close to each other, and both need to be blocked on sight, as they were both indef blocked.— Dædαlus+ Contribs 04:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC) User:VanityFaresssss has been, the IP, not yet. I do believe MuZemike is offline. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC) You're right. I hesitated as I checked earlier but found nothing. However, I checked again just now with other IPs and saw the clear connection. That IP has been blocked. –MuZemike 06:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Since this is open maybe someone could check out Movieediting2222 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) just to see if it is Kagome_85 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) because User:Movieediting2222 basically undid the edits that User:Daedalus969 made to the same articles Thanks Thanks for the info. Not being very technosavvy I new something was up but had no idea what. I appreciate the time you took in filling me in. Cheers again. MarnetteD | Talk 01:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Help! I just noticed on my Watchlist that you blocked User:Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. I knew there was something suspicious about how he started doing CCI work the same day he registered. I was foolish not to challenge it further but he had the lingo down pat and was he ever audacious -- see my talkpage for example. He had several articles I created deleted and interfered with my CCI. Can you undo whatever he did (re Cyril Axelrod, John Creaney and Joan Refshauge)? Thanks so much. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC) P.S. -- what does this guy have against me? Let's double-check with the deleting admin of those two articles (which would be User:SchuminWeb) before we go restoring; the last thing I want to do is restore copyright violations, even inadvertently. –MuZemike 03:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC) I have invited the two deleting admins to make their comments with regards to the deletions here. –MuZemike 03:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC) User:SchuminWeb is out of Virginia somewhere, I do believe, as he edits alot of the same articles I do (and I am in Virginia). Normally operates during the night (I see him alot at night), so he might be on soon or might be around at the moment. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC) OK I understand protocol. I am almost over the shock. But shouldn't the Peter Karlsen userpage ([1]) be tagged as an indefinite ban? Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC) I'd tag it, but I'm uncertain exactly what he's been blocked for so I'll leave it for someone else to decide. HalfShadow 03:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC) I have already spoken to an arbitrator, whom has told me that Peter Karlsen has not been allowed to create any further accounts, at which point I must conclude that block evasion is going on. –MuZemike 06:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Sockpuppets of Edstat Hi MuZemike! Please view Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edstat. Thanks! Sincerely, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 12:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Too late! The case is closed. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 00:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC) I know, I saw it :) –MuZemike 00:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC) Follow up to yesterdays ANI on Grundle2600 I just have go an Email from Grundle2600 this morning though the "Email me" feature is there any reason we have not blocked his capabilities for that? The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Probably because nobody has raised any concerns that his emails have been getting abusive to the point of revoking email access. –MuZemike 18:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC) I wouldn't call the email abusive by a long shot. I was just surprised and curious as i thought being Banned it would have been a procedural revocation The Resident Anthropologist (talk) Actually, we don't revoke email access unless it is known that the user is using it for abuse, or in some cases as I do, if there is good reason to believe (i.e. from serial vandals) that email will be abused from that account. –MuZemike 18:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Thanx Learn something new every day here The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Gennady Yanayev I've responded to all your comments, are there anymore problems with the article? --TIAYN (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)