User talk:Slakr

slakr's life is currently frolicking with chaos, so his activity and response times to queries will be highly variable. Leave a message and he will respond whenever he gets a chance— that is, assuming he gets a chance. Cheers =) zOMG!!! I need urgent assistance!!!1!! — banana? — kiwi?

---

Ideally, please use this link to post new messages at the bottom. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :)

---

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.

Click here to start a new talk topic

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Regarding slakr: Why did my page get deleted? Please see Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? first. I have no idea what you're talking about. What's vandalism? If you received a warning from me and you're not logged in, you might have gotten an old warning I sent to someone who shares your IP address. On the other hand, if you've made recent edits and received a recent warning message from me and you genuinely believe that it's not vandalism, don't fret-- simply drop me a message below, because I could have simply made a silly mistake. :) Regarding SineBot: Why does SineBot keep signing stuff I've already signed? All comments should have a signature that includes both a link to your user page (slakr) and a datestamp (05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)) (per signatures - internal links). This is most easily generated by placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your contributions, which makes something like "slakr 05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)". If you have an interwiki-linked user page, consider either creating a user page on enwiki that redirects to your preferred home wiki or simply opting out of automatic signing. If you're still having problems after trying that, post a message below. Be sure to include diffs to make sure I can reference the problem. I don't want my comments signed by SineBot. How do I get it to ignore me or my talk page? Please use one of the opt-out methods listed on its user page. SineBot forgot to sign something it should have signed. Usually this happens because the bot isn't sure if it really should sign something, so it defaults to not signing it (e.g., in cases of complex edits). It does this to avoid being annoying. Other times, a comment might be made when the bot is down for maintenance, so the bot simply never sees it. SineBot signed something that it genuinely should not have signed. Please let me know-- especially if you think it's not a one-time thing. Be sure to include diffs to make sure I can reference the problem. Is SineBot's source code available? Not currently. I'm signing with four tildes (~~~~) but it's still saying I didn't! You likely enabled raw signatures. Open your preferences, click the "User profile" tab, make sure that "Treat the above as wiki markup" is NOT checked, and click Save; it should be fixed. If you have an interwiki-linked user page, consider either creating a user page on enwiki that redirects to your preferred home wiki or simply opting out of automatic signing.

(ok sorry)194.83.96.153 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)--194.83.96.153 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)--194.83.96.153 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC) bobby

Report helper

Sorry not to reply earlier. The template for reporting 3RR says, "You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too." Administrators may also protect a page if there is no discussion. TFD (talk) 00:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

SLOVIO - allowing SLOVIO CREATION

Hi, I was told to turn to you. I do not really know who you are, but here is the topic I want to discuss:

Slovio is the first viable and usable inter-slavic langauge created since the demise of Old Church Slavonic, it was created in 1999 Websites: www.slovio.com www.interslavic.org, www.youtube.com/interslavic etc, etc. The creation of Slovio has "inspired" more than a dozen plagiarized copy-cat language "projects". One or several of the plagiators have been behind the removal of the article from wikipedia, and one of them especially, Jan van Steenbergen (Ijseren) to this day keeps removing all links to Slovio and keeps re-writing history and facts. In fact he has made from wikipedia his own PRIVATE and CENSORED encyclopedia for self-promotion. I want to caution you that Mr Steenbergen has several wikipedia logins (check the IPs) so it would not be so obvious what he is doing and altering. He is promoting his own "language" Slovianski, which he had "created" in 2006, after he has been a long-time member of various Slovio-forums, including forums on Yahoo and www.blognik.com. His "sudden creative inspiration" was a to make a plagiarized copy of Slovio and subsequently erase all mention of Slovio from wikipedia, as well the constant re-writing of history of Slavic conlangs in order to promote his own plagiarized copy-cat language. Please restore Slovio to its proper place and ban, permanently Mr Jan van Steenbergen (and all his logins)from Wikipedia. his censorship, self-promotion and removal and alteration of facts are only hurting wikipedia reputation. By the way the most important and most influential, the first and the original interslavic language of the modern era SLOVIO has been removed from wikipedia because it wasnt important enough, but about a dozen half-witted "linguistic creations" of Mr Jan van Steenbergen, and others found a place in wikipedia. ?!? Please check carefully the entire history of Mr Steenbergens "contributions and alterations" (under all his variou logins) in order to get and idea about the size of fraud and censorship that is going on here.

This is a real irony that the original interslavic language SLOVIO craeted in 1999 has been deleted and the name banned from re-creation, while such half-witted copy-cat projects as Slovianski, etc, have been allowed. By the way Slovianski and other copy-cat projects based on Slovio violate my copy rights. Yes it appears that IJzeren (Jan van Steenbergen) had at the time of deletion supported Slovio, but under his other logins he had opposed it and inspired deletion. He had bragged about his different logins on forums, I have no proof, only suspicion. Perhaps you can check it through your archives.

Please let me know why are you opposed to Slovio, the webpage that has not been created by me but by independent (to me unknown) users. The reason why I had finally registered was to get the record straight. In the meantime Mr Jan van Steenbergen is doing a real terror against me in forums and on the internet calling me various insulting names. I have never met the man, I just believe that his hate stems from the fact that he wants to destroy Slovio and me in order to rewrite the history (as was being done in wikipedia) and make himself the originator of the interslavic language idea. Just check google, I am sure you will find websites where he is insulting me and calling me all the dirtiest names one can think of. Why are you blocking the website? Is he a friend of yours? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blognik (talk • contribs) 13:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The page was deleted as a result of an Articles for deletion (AFD) discussion, and due to it being re-created repeatedly, was protected against re-creation. If you believe that the issues discussed in the AFD that resulted in deletion are no longer applicable, you are free to request deletion review to overturn it. --slakr^\ talk / 07:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Recently Deleted Page

Minutes ago a page i had recently added and was currently in the middle of editing was deleted. I wrote the "hang on" bit on the page as suggested by the speedy deletion memo, however it is possible i had written this in an incorrect format. I do realize that at the time the page did not demonstrate the significance of the subjectas was stated by the deleter, but it is only because i had not gotten there yet and was still working on constructing the page and figuring out the script commands, (being a relatively new wikipedia contributor and a first time page creator). anyways the subject of my page was a rising star, actor and incredibly accomplished martial artist who i believe deserves to be recognized. He has played in several large movies before including Jackie Chan's Honor as well as Break starring David Carradine. He is the creator of the "Urban Ninja" video on youtube which at one time was the 3rd most viewed video on the site of all time. He appeared in the 2009 season of american gladiators playing the gladiator "Zen", has played in numerous commercials for companys such as K-Swiss, Mattel, Darian Lakes and was also features in the music video for Weezer's song Pork and Beans. He is also the founder of the EMC Monkeys, a highly successful martial arts and stunts group based out of West Minster, California. He has a huge cult following and has been publicly recognized by Jackie Chan, who showcased him on his reality show The Diciple, and even Tina Turner who hired him to be the half time show for her final world tour last year. He is becoming more and more famous and in my oppinion is deserving of a wikipedia page. I hope i have argued my case sufficiently and i would be very thankful if you would restore my page and give me an opportunity to bring it up to standards before reavaluating it. Thank you very much for your time, Archangelt. ps. the pages name was "Xin Wuku: The Urban Ninja" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archanelt (talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

You would need to demonstrate that the subject meets our notability guidelines, and cite some verifiable and reliable secondary sources to substantiate your claims, as an initial google check on the name turned up very little to demonstrate any significant notability. --slakr^\ talk / 07:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Voice for Disability..?

Hi there, you deleted a page that my friend and me wrote for the charity "Voice for Disability" for "blatant advertising", and we were wondering what needed changing in it in order for it to not be deleted...
As far as I can see there are tons of similar pages on Wikipedia (such as schools sites) that do exactly the same thing, so we were a bit confused!

Any help would be much appreciated,
Thanks,
Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwest612 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

It's primarily stuff that makes you sound good, prose-wise, so that the reader assumes as fact that which they'd otherwise evaluate and decide on their own. You'll see similar examples in any given company's mission statement or "about me" sections of press releases, for example. On a related note, be sure to read up on your first article, our notability guidelines for inclusion, and our conflicts of interest guidelines. --slakr^\ talk / 06:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Ryan James Stafford.

He is not a blatant hoax. Please stop removing his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanden15 (talk • contribs) 06:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

From the article: "best known for his powers in the art of wizadry and incredible powers to levitate and jump." Dude...it's "wizardry," and clearly you're not at all skilled in it, else you'd be able to spell it correctly—all great wizards do. Clearly, if you can't master that, then levitating and jumping is clearly outside of your reach. --slakr^\ talk / 06:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

re

why u delete my thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexychick1991 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?. --slakr^\ talk / 22:17, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Blocking on Coanda-1910

Regarding the blocking related to Coanda-1910, I will present the public Mea Culpa, when you'll explain me the rule I did break. Thanks in advance, with my WP:AAGF on your side.--Lsorin (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring and personal attacks. Comment on content, not on other people. This has been explained to you. And you are not blocked now. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

You were edit warring. Click the link. Read the page. I genuinely do not care whether you admit "mea culpa" or not, but you should seriously consider at least the possibility that you edit warred—regardless of what you edit warred over—otherwise at some point in the future you'll probably do it again and once again find yourself overcome with shock when you're blocked yet again. It's kind of like someone who repeatedly exceeds a speed limit but simply cannot understand why they were given traffic tickets for doing so. --slakr^\ talk / 06:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Protesting interference

Sir: You are wasting my time. I am editing something I've written on the talk page of attachment theory and I have already had to redo it twice. I'm at the community college and need to get home before midnight, so bug off. (that's American. do you read?) If you want to discuss it do it on the talk page. Margaret9mary (talk) 01:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Margaret9mary (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)