Talk:History of zoology (1859–1912): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
class |
{{summary in|zoology}} |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{summary in|zoology}} |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
||
|- |
|- |
Revision as of 23:10, 1 January 2011
A summary of this article appears in zoology. |
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Animals Redirect‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Evolutionary biology NA‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | History of Science NA‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
This article was copied from an early-twentieth century source of unknown provenance. It ends in mid-sentence. --Jose Ramos 13:42, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Time Span...
What is the logic for having this article end in 1912... I mean besides the 1911 encyclopedia... Jabencarsey 04:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Goodness, this really is a terrible article! What can be done? There isn't any modern work with such scope, and this is bad even for 1911... Macdonald-ross 19:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class animal articles
- High-importance animal articles
- WikiProject Animals articles
- NA-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- High-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- NA-Class history of science articles
- High-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles