Jump to content

PLOS One: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Publication concept: Updated latest number of peer reviewers and added reference
→Publication concept: Updated latest number of peer reviewers and added reference
Line 63: Line 63:
}}</ref> Being an online-only publication allows ''PLoS ONE'' to publish more papers than a print journal. It does not restrict itself to a specific scientific area in an effort to facilitate publication of research on topics outside, or between, traditional science categories.<ref name=MacCallum>{{cite journal|last=MacCallum|first=C.J.|date=2006|url=http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040401|title=ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS|doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040401|journal=PLoS Biol.|volume=4|issue=11|page=e401}}</ref>
}}</ref> Being an online-only publication allows ''PLoS ONE'' to publish more papers than a print journal. It does not restrict itself to a specific scientific area in an effort to facilitate publication of research on topics outside, or between, traditional science categories.<ref name=MacCallum>{{cite journal|last=MacCallum|first=C.J.|date=2006|url=http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040401|title=ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS|doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040401|journal=PLoS Biol.|volume=4|issue=11|page=e401}}</ref>


Papers published in ''PLoS ONE'' can be of any length, contain full color throughout, and contain supplementary materials (such as multimedia files). The journal uses an editorial board of almost 1,400 academics and in the first four years following launch it made use of over 35,000 external peer reviewers. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2010/12/29/thanking-our-peer-reviewers-2/|title=Thanking PLoS ONE Peer Reviewers|work=PLos ONE|date=Dec 2010|accessdate=16 January 2011}</ref> ''PLoS ONE'' publishes approximately 70&thinsp;% of all submissions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.plosone.org/static/review.action|title=PLoS ONE Editorial and Peer-Review Process|work=PLos ONE|date=2008|accessdate=9 September 2010}}</ref>
Papers published in ''PLoS ONE'' can be of any length, contain full color throughout, and contain supplementary materials (such as multimedia files). The journal uses an editorial board of almost 1,400 academics and in the first four years following launch it made use of over 35,000 external peer reviewers. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2010/12/29/thanking-our-peer-reviewers-2/|title=Thanking PLoS ONE Peer Reviewers|work=PLos ONE|date=Dec 2010|accessdate=16 January 2011}}</ref> ''PLoS ONE'' publishes approximately 70&thinsp;% of all submissions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.plosone.org/static/review.action|title=PLoS ONE Editorial and Peer-Review Process|work=PLos ONE|date=2008|accessdate=9 September 2010}}</ref>


==Business model==
==Business model==

Revision as of 07:30, 17 January 2011

PLoS ONE
DisciplineMultidisciplinary
LanguageEnglish
Edited byPeter Binfield
Publication details
History2006–present
Publisher
FrequencyArticles are published upon acceptance
Yes
4.351 (2009)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4PLoS ONE
Indexing
ISSN1932-6203
Links

PLoS ONE is an open access scientific journal published by Public Library of Science since 2006. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. All submissions go through an internal and external pre-publication peer review but are not excluded on the basis of lack of perceived importance or adherence to a scientific field. The PLoS ONE online platform has post-publication user discussion and rating features.

History

Development

PLoS ONE was launched in December 2006 as a beta version. It launched with Commenting and Note making functionality, and added the ability to rate articles in July 2007. In September 2007 the ability to leave "trackbacks"[1] on articles was added. In August 2008 it moved from a weekly publication schedule to a daily one, publishing articles as soon as they became ready. In October 2008 PLoS ONE came out of "beta". Also in September 2009, as part of its "Article-Level Metrics" program, PLoS ONE made the full online usage data for every published article (HTML page views, PDF, and XML downloads) publicly available.

Output

In 2006 the journal published 138 articles; in 2007 it published just over 1,200 articles; and in 2008 it published almost 2,800 articles, making it the largest open access journal in the world. In 2009, 4,406 articles were published, making PLoS ONE the third largest scientific journal in the world (by volume) and in 2010 6,749 articles were published, making the journal the largest in the world (by volume).[2]

Management

The founding Managing Editor was Chris Surridge. He was succeeded by Peter Binfield in March 2008.

Publication concept

PLoS ONE is built on several conceptually different ideas compared to traditional peer-reviewed scientific publishing in that it does not use the perceived importance of a paper as a criterion for acceptance or rejection. The idea is that, instead, PLoS ONE only verifies whether experiments and data analysis were conducted rigorously, and leaves it to the scientific community to ascertain importance, post publication, through debate and comment.[3] This, however, is not always achieved in practice since editors and reviewers might have a subjective opinion about the articles they are reviewing which in turn might lead to the acception or rejection of papers of doubtful quality or intent.

Each submission will be assessed by a member of the PLoS ONE Editorial Board before publication. This pre-publication peer review will concentrate on technical rather than subjective concerns and may involve discussion with other members of the Editorial Board and/or the solicitation of formal reports from independent referees. If published, papers will be made available for community-based open peer review involving online annotation, discussion, and rating.[4]

According to Nature, the journal's aim is to "challenge academia's obsession with journal status and impact factors."[5] Being an online-only publication allows PLoS ONE to publish more papers than a print journal. It does not restrict itself to a specific scientific area in an effort to facilitate publication of research on topics outside, or between, traditional science categories.[3]

Papers published in PLoS ONE can be of any length, contain full color throughout, and contain supplementary materials (such as multimedia files). The journal uses an editorial board of almost 1,400 academics and in the first four years following launch it made use of over 35,000 external peer reviewers. [6] PLoS ONE publishes approximately 70 % of all submissions.[7]

Business model

As with all journals of the Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE is financed by charging authors a publication fee. As of July 2010, PLoS ONE charges authors $1,350[8] to publish an article. It will waive the fee for authors who do not have sufficient funds.[9] The "author-pays" model allows PLoS journals to provide all articles to everybody for free (open access) immediately after publication. Reuse of articles is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License, version 2.5.

Community recognition and Citation Information

In September 2009, PLoS ONE received the Publishing Innovation Award of the Association for Learned and Professional Society Publishers.[10] The award is given in recognition of a "truly innovative approach to any aspect of publication as adjudged from originality and innovative qualities, together with utility, benefit to the community and long term prospects". In January 2010 it was announced that it was to be analyzed by Journal Citation Reports.[11] Its current (2009) impact factor is 4.351[12] Additionally, the Scopus Journal Analyzer reports a "trend line" (total citations to all articles ever published received in a year divided by total number of articles published in that year) value of 3.74 for PLoS ONE for the year 2009 (up to February 10, 2010).[13]

Abstracting and indexing

The articles are indexed in:[4]

2

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Images from PLoS ONE.

References

  1. ^ [1]Zivkovic, Bora; Trackbacks are here!
  2. ^ Morroson, Heather (5 January 2011). "plos one now worlds largest journal". Poetic Economics Blog. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
  3. ^ a b MacCallum, C.J. (2006). "ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS". PLoS Biol. 4 (11): e401. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040401.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  4. ^ a b PLoS ONE Journal Information
  5. ^ Giles, J (2007). "Open-access journal will publish first, judge later". Nature. 445 (7123): 9. doi:10.1038/445009a. PMID 17203032. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |author= and |last1= specified (help)
  6. ^ "Thanking PLoS ONE Peer Reviewers". PLos ONE. Dec 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
  7. ^ "PLoS ONE Editorial and Peer-Review Process". PLos ONE. 2008. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
  8. ^ "PLoS ONE Guidelines for Authors". PLoS ONE. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
  9. ^ "PLoS ONE Publication fees". PLoS ONE. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
  10. ^ "ALPSP Awards 2010–finalists announced". ALPSP. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
  11. ^ Patterson, Mark (5 January 2010). "PLoS ONE indexed by Web of Science". PLoS Blogs. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
  12. ^ 2009 Journal Citation Reports Science Edition. Philadelphia, Thompson Rueters, 2010.
  13. ^ "Preview". Scopus. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PLOS_One&oldid=408354209"