Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFL coaching trees: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jaque Hammer (talk | contribs) |
→NFL coaching trees: Merge |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
*'''Delete''' same content as [[Coaching tree]]. [[User:Jaque Hammer|Jaque Hammer]] ([[User talk:Jaque Hammer|talk]]) 05:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' same content as [[Coaching tree]]. [[User:Jaque Hammer|Jaque Hammer]] ([[User talk:Jaque Hammer|talk]]) 05:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge''' into Coaching Tree as per above. So far this seems to be an NFL-specific neologism. Unless and until this trend starts appearing in college football there is no reason for a specific article on the NFL. And in any case, it's generally better to focus on building up one article, as opposed to dividing and duplicating your efforts on a number of sub-pages. --<span style="border:1px solid #63B8FF; font-weight:bold; color:#23238E; background-color:#D0E7FF;"> [[User:Roninbk|RoninBK]] <sub> [[User talk:Roninbk|T]] [[Special:Contributions/Roninbk|C]] </sub> </span> 09:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:08, 27 January 2011
NFL coaching trees
- NFL coaching trees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Classic case example of Original research. Ibluffsocall (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete; see above. Drmies (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reasons as I noted for Coaching tree, or merge the two articles as one. Bearian (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to the Coaching tree article (where I gave reasons to keep that article). There is no reason for a separate article on NFL coaching trees, at least that I can see.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment as noted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coaching tree, this is definitely not original research.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete same content as Coaching tree. Jaque Hammer (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Merge into Coaching Tree as per above. So far this seems to be an NFL-specific neologism. Unless and until this trend starts appearing in college football there is no reason for a specific article on the NFL. And in any case, it's generally better to focus on building up one article, as opposed to dividing and duplicating your efforts on a number of sub-pages. -- RoninBK T C 09:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)