Jump to content

User talk:Justinsane15: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 407222187 by Courcelles (talk)
Line 57: Line 57:


Hello, in the interest of not getting blocked over [[WP:3RR]], [[WP:WAR]], or [[WP:CIVIL]], you may want to get some more opinions at [[WT:MMA]]. I'll add my opinion if you start a topic there. —<font face="Verdana">[[User:LOL|LOL]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:LOL|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/LOL|C]]</sub></font> 11:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, in the interest of not getting blocked over [[WP:3RR]], [[WP:WAR]], or [[WP:CIVIL]], you may want to get some more opinions at [[WT:MMA]]. I'll add my opinion if you start a topic there. —<font face="Verdana">[[User:LOL|LOL]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:LOL|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/LOL|C]]</sub></font> 11:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

==revisions==

you keep changing pages that do not need to be. I see them made up nicely and you take them back a step. mainly MMA.

Revision as of 08:53, 1 February 2011

Welcome!

List of Current UFC fighters

I understand that the reference on James McSweeney may seem dated, and that he's probably not in the UFC anymore, but I need actual proof to that end, even if it's just him competing in another organization. The point of the reference, although it may seem dated, is that it proves that at some point he was signed on to the UFC, thus to my knowledge he still is. I don't honestly think he's with the organization, but until some reference can be cited to prove as much he has to stay on the list.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 15:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wish the UFC website was reliable enough to make all my changes based on what it does, but it isn't. Heath Herring was still listed there last I checked, it's not a viable resource. And yes that link isn't great, but it's the only one I could find that referenced him being signed to the UFC. If you can find a better one please do, if you can find evidence, clear, absolute evidence, that he has been cut please do and I will be happy to acknowledge it, otherwise, he will fight somewhere else sooner or later, or someone will come out and announce that he was released sooner or later and when that happens I will be the first one to take him off the list. Several fighters have this problem on this list and I can't just delete them all because they lost a couple fights and nobody's heard anything about them. I will update the link to information about his last UFC fight to at least show he fought for them only a couple months ago, but that's the best I can do.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 16:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I've been poking around the web trying to find a reasonable citation for McSweeney (I even read most of his boring-ass twitter account just to see if he was talking about being cut) I'm now seeing that people think he might fight Karlos Vemola, so the verdict is definitely out on whether or not he's cut.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super Heavyweight (MMA)

Why do you delete my table? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.195.205 (talk) 21:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is KOTC not top tier? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.195.205 (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really comparing King of the Cage to UFC, Strikeforce, DREAM, etc. (Justinsane15 (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Strikeforce: Los Angeles

The poster is up for this event, you can find it at: http://strikeforce.com/news/2010/04/28/%E2%80%9Cruthless%E2%80%99%E2%80%99-robbie-lawler-kj-noons-and-bobby-lashley-will-be-featured-at-strikeforce-event-wednesday-june-16-at-nokia-theatre-l-a-live/ Trunks8719 (talk) 23:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strikeforce: Fedor vs Werdum

i suck at editing wiki, sorry. i had the source in there but it didnt come out right on the reference list http://www.mmafighting.com/2010/06/22/fedor-vs-werdum-card-complete-with-addition-of-four-preliminary/ Delinquent1904 (talk) 23:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


no doubt, thats actually what i did, but i must not of done it right still cause it ended up adding 4 of the same source in the reference list Delinquent1904 (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ShoMMA

Thanks for keeping up the good fight against the guy intent on putting ShoMMA results in boxes. Udar55 (talk) 13:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation of ShoMMA

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to ShoMMA was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 23:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The Request for mediation concerning ShoMMA, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 00:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

Why did you revert my edit?

Why did you revert my edit on the MMA weight class champions. By removing WEC? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost563 (talkcontribs) 03:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you reverted my weight class page contributions?

These meet all of the standards for inclusion. They are properly sourced, written from a neutral point of view, and add to the information contained on and available through the page. Please explain.(Gravity 76 (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Can you please give me some guidelines or suggestions for how I could better frame the information I provided? As I indicated before, the material is a legitimate contribution which enriches the page. It is factual, neutral, and does not duplicate any other information on the page. I would be happy to rephrase any portions of the writing to better adhere to these standards, but I do not believe that the information itself (as opposed to the form of its presentation) warrants deletion. Should it be in a different section, or drafted in a different manner? I look forward to hearing from you.(Gravity 76 (talk) 00:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your message Justinsane15. I've gone through the standards you linked me to and will do my best to adhere to them. Please let me know if you have any more thoughts; I may try again with the weight class contributions in the near future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gravity 76 (talkcontribs) 21:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waachiim Spiritwolf

Hi, i edit Waachiim Spiritwolf article, and add his record, you can add location of events  mountaineer1976

Hello, in the interest of not getting blocked over WP:3RR, WP:WAR, or WP:CIVIL, you may want to get some more opinions at WT:MMA. I'll add my opinion if you start a topic there. —LOL T/C 11:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

revisions

you keep changing pages that do not need to be. I see them made up nicely and you take them back a step. mainly MMA.