Jump to content

User talk:Kafziel: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 214: Line 214:


Please reconsider use of Pending Changes on [[Radio Battalion]], given the ongoing RfC on use of PC, and the notice regarding its use, and...well, the fact that there is no consensus for using it, beyond a trial period of 2 months which was from June 2010. Please see [[WP:PCRFC]] and feel free to comment there. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Please reconsider use of Pending Changes on [[Radio Battalion]], given the ongoing RfC on use of PC, and the notice regarding its use, and...well, the fact that there is no consensus for using it, beyond a trial period of 2 months which was from June 2010. Please see [[WP:PCRFC]] and feel free to comment there. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
:I don't see any consensus ''not'' to use it, either. If it wasn't supposed to be used, I wouldn't be able to use it. I think it's a friendlier alternative to the semi-protection I could have used instead. I'm not particularly interested in any RFC about it; I don't mind if they do away with Pending Changes, but I will use the tools I have while they are available. [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] <sup>[[User talk:Kafziel|Complaint Department: Please take a number]]</sup> 01:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:21, 27 February 2011

Note: This page is sometimes semi-protected. If you are an IP editor or have a new account, it's possible you won't be able to post a message here.
Please try here first. But, if it's protected, you can leave me a message at User talk:Kafziel/Unprotected. I'll respond to good faith questions/comments as soon as I can. Thanks, and sorry for the trouble.
I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message here, I will reply here. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks!


The Signpost: 6 December 2010

Pasadena et al

moved post duh! Sorry! DocOfSoc (talk) 23:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

Spatula

Hello, My name is Austin.

I have been searching high and low for a specific spatula that my dad used everyday before it broke. Somehow I stumbled across the picture you took of the 5 different spatulas. The spatula I am looking for is the one on the far right. I have been looking for this for over a year. Do you know the name of the maker or the style or any information that could help me find one to purchase? I appreciate any info you have. Thanks Alot, Austin. anall44@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.178.140 (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

car burglary picture

I want to use your photo for a background to some graphs I am using in my news story. Do you want attribution? if so, what name?

thanks, Adam Balinski abbalinski@gmail.com 69.169.154.14 (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Adam. You're welcome to use the photo without attribution. Thanks for asking. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 21:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WHO ARE YOU? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.36.220.165 (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Batman. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 17:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010



To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

Userfication of "berkeley igem team" page

Hi, I would like to request a userfication of the berkeley igem team wiki page. I noticed that it was tagged as not notable enough, so I found several sources to verify that it has received enough press coverage from independent reliable to be deemed "notable."

Here are the sites: http://www.synberc.org/iGEM/ucb/ http://bioeng.berkeley.edu/berkeley/igem/team/finalist/at/jamboree.php http://sanfrancisco.about.com/b/2008/11/12/uc-berkeley-team-a-finalist-at-igem-2008.htm http://www.bioethics.gov/documents/synthetic-biology/The-International-Genetically-Engineered-Machine-Competition-and-The-Registry-of-Standard-Biological-Parts.pdf http://sciencereview.dreamhosters.com/articleex.php?issue=19&article=features_04_factory http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC

Please consider this, Thanks, Harrison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hlucb (talk • contribs) 01:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What was the article name? I searched for "Berkeley IGEM team" and I don't see anything, even in deleted articles. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 03:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

Secret killer (talk · contribs)

Could you take a look at the edits made by Secret Killer on the White American article? They seem to be trying to settle a score related to the now-deleted White Argentine article, and I note that you provided advice on the sourcing of collages that they are now applying with great rigor. I don't particularly like those collages, and tend to agree that he has a point about sourcing, but it doesn't excuse edit-warring over it in my opinion. Since they previously tried to redirect the entire article to an Eminem album on the grounds that it was "unsourced", it appears that they're using the collage sourcing issue as a wedge. A second opinion would be appreciated. Acroterion (talk) 04:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He seems to have stopped, so hopefully that's the end of it. Thanks for the heads-up. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 19:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Battalion PC

Please reconsider use of Pending Changes on Radio Battalion, given the ongoing RfC on use of PC, and the notice regarding its use, and...well, the fact that there is no consensus for using it, beyond a trial period of 2 months which was from June 2010. Please see WP:PCRFC and feel free to comment there.  Chzz  ►  00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any consensus not to use it, either. If it wasn't supposed to be used, I wouldn't be able to use it. I think it's a friendlier alternative to the semi-protection I could have used instead. I'm not particularly interested in any RFC about it; I don't mind if they do away with Pending Changes, but I will use the tools I have while they are available. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 01:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kafziel&oldid=416131214"