Jump to content

Don't Buy This: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m That's what a collection of games in one package is called in the UK.
Line 21: Line 21:
Instead of rejecting the submissions, they decided to mock the original developers by releasing them together and publicly brand it as "unoriginal" and "awful". [[Telecomsoft#Firebird|Firebird]] even disowned all their copyright to the game and encouraged buyers to pirate it at will.
Instead of rejecting the submissions, they decided to mock the original developers by releasing them together and publicly brand it as "unoriginal" and "awful". [[Telecomsoft#Firebird|Firebird]] even disowned all their copyright to the game and encouraged buyers to pirate it at will.


The combination was sold for £2.50 ($3.88 USD).
The compilation was sold for £2.50 ($3.88 USD).


==Games==
==Games==

Revision as of 04:02, 3 March 2011

Don't Buy This
Ghost House
Developer(s)Various
Publisher(s)Firebird
Platform(s)ZX Spectrum
Release1985
Genre(s)Video game compilations
Mode(s)Single player

Don't Buy This (also known as: Don't Buy This: Five of the Worst Games Ever) is a ZX Spectrum compilation. As described on the box, it contains five of the poorest games submitted to Firebird.

Instead of rejecting the submissions, they decided to mock the original developers by releasing them together and publicly brand it as "unoriginal" and "awful". Firebird even disowned all their copyright to the game and encouraged buyers to pirate it at will.

The compilation was sold for £2.50 ($3.88 USD).

Games

  • Fido 1
  • Fido 2: Puppy Power
  • Race Ace
  • Fruit Machine
  • Weasel Willy

Reception

Your Spectrum wrote: "The games aren't that bad as do-it-yourself games but, they won't provide that much fun."[1] Sinclair User said it contained "five of the most uninspired games ever to disgrace the Spectrum."[2] In a 2011 retrospective on the compilation, television presenter and gaming journalist Larry Bundy Jr admitted he had to showcase the game as a retrospective rather than a review because: "you can’t exactly review or give the ol’ “angry reviewer” treatment to a game that openly admits that it’s supposed to be rubbish can you?"[3]

See also

References