Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webcams (Website)

Webcams (Website)

Webcams (Website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable website, most of the various references are for the facts throughout the article and not actually related to the subject Jac16888^Talk 16:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Makeet (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
• Comment Webcams as a website, was for two times nominee at XBIZ_Award in 2009 and last time this year in 2011. Various references was used in sections: Live Peep Shows and Third-party sellers and covers adult_videochat area and affiliate_programs in this adult website area. Makeet (talk) 00:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  1 of 20 nominees and it didn't presumably it didn't win either year, which I doubt would make much difference since the awards themselves don't appear to be especially notable. And the references used in those sections have nothing to do with the website itself, the fact you managed to provide a reference explaining what a camgirl is is not exactly important--Jac16888^Talk 00:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  XBIZ along with XBIZ_Award are currently the Oscars for adult_industry. I do not want to express an opinion about if a nominee in two years is important or not. About if my references have nothing to do with the website itself I can say that all related to action from an adult videochat in my case Webcams. Makeet (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  And thats according to who exactly?. You need references which demonstrate why the website is notable, of which you have none--Jac16888^Talk 02:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)--Jac16888^Talk 02:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)--Jac16888^Talk 02:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

You need references which demonstrate why the website is notable – The most important reference who demonstrate that Webcams_(Website) is notable is Rabbits_Reviews. Along with the two XBIZ_Award nominations another reference is from Adult Reviews: Webcams Review Makeet (talk) 09:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. XBIZ is a component of a public relationa/promotion business; its awards are not subject-independent and fail the "well-known"/"significant" standard. Most of the sources cited in the article do not relate to its corporate subject, but are general discussions of online erotica used to bulk out an otherwise insubstantial article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• Comment I structured my Wiki article into five short sections, each section with its own sources. Some sources cited are related at Webcams website activity with his components: adult videochat and affiliate program. Two XBIZ nominees are a notable recognition for this website. My Wiki article is relatively new and I continue to improve my article with new reliable resources. Makeet (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Delete - As per nomination.--Antwerpen Synagoge (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Blocked Sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. -- DQ (t) (e) 19:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• With all my respect I wanna tell you. I worked more than four month for documentation for this wiki article, two Wikipedia editors review and finally approve my article and now, with two words a contribution to be proposed to be deleted. I repeat, sources used for webcams website activity has two important components: adult videochat and affiliate program. At adult videochat section I offered details with reliable sources, about HD streaming used on Webcams website. At affiliate program I offered details with reliable sources about model of business used in this affiliate program on Webcams website. Makeet (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

• Note A new source was added on Webcams in the world of video chat section: [1] Makeet (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

And that is a truly spectacular WP:RS failure (as are most online posts bylined "Mephistopheles." Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

truly spectacular WP:RS failure - I believe your statement mischievous that comes just to cancel my work and more than that to pick out laughing. Do you think that, this attitude comes as help for someone to improve something? Makeet (talk) 09:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)