Jump to content

Talk:The Mighty Ducks (film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:
I'm changing the following line, 'The children's parents also voice their displeasure for working overtime to pay the money to enroll their kids in the league, only to see them take dives.' This is a misinterpretation of the scene. The father of the two boys was actually saying that he was giving up the chance to work overtime in order to come to his children's games, not that he needed to work overtime in order to be able to afford it. He was willing to give up overtime for to see his children play hockey, but not to see them take dives.
I'm changing the following line, 'The children's parents also voice their displeasure for working overtime to pay the money to enroll their kids in the league, only to see them take dives.' This is a misinterpretation of the scene. The father of the two boys was actually saying that he was giving up the chance to work overtime in order to come to his children's games, not that he needed to work overtime in order to be able to afford it. He was willing to give up overtime for to see his children play hockey, but not to see them take dives.


Why is there no mention of the plot strand involvin eric and the angry/inaudible beaver who lives at the end of the road?
Why is there no mention of the plot strand involving eric and the angry/inaudible beaver who lives at the end of the road?


I feel like we are missing a trick by not including anything on what is basically the main 'theme' of the film.
I feel like we are missing a trick by not including anything on what is basically the main 'theme' of the film.

Revision as of 16:40, 14 March 2011

WikiProject iconIce Hockey Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconFilm: American Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Rink In the Movie?

Is there any chance we could gather a list of the rinks the movie was filmed at? I recognized Parade Ice Gardens in Minneapolis, but there are more. Alec Marshall, 9:34 Central Time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.216.249.229 (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

I've trimmed the overlong plot summary down to a bare synopsis. Please feel free to augment sparingly with significant plot detail. --Tony 01:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Re-wrote the plot, you made it far too vague. - Rory.

There is one aspect of the plot that is presented incorrectly. Bombay did not try to steal Banks from the Hawks. His team didn't trust him because he was formerly a Hawk. In seeking his advice, Hans explained to Gordon that the district lines were redrawn and that Gordon would've been a Duck with the current lines. He then protested Banks' eligibility to play for the Hawks since Banks also lived in District 5 (the Ducks' district). Banks came to play for the Ducks because he wanted to keep playing. He surely would have been cut by the Hawks' coach since the coach was all about winning championships and the Hawks would have to forfeit any game that Banks played in if the protest was upheld. Bombay was fired from his job for refusing to withdraw his protest after the league, his boss, the Hawks coach, and Banks' dad arranged for Banks to keep playing for the Hawks (and to redraw the district lines to put Banks back in the Hawks' district) provided Gordon withdraw the protest, citing that his boss made him coach to "learn fairplay" and that this was unfair to the Ducks. This created a rift between the Hawks coach and Bombay, and ultimately exposed to Gordon what his former coach was really all about when the coach orders two of his players to take out Banks in the final game. - Eric

What's wrong with a detailed synopsis?

Everyone seems to be against having a summary of the story go much further than what one would see on an IMDB page for the movie. Granted, there are probably some elements to the movie that are best left out of a plot synopsis, but I've seen plenty of movie pages on Wikipedia that went into the same amount of detail about the plot as there was in the past, and there doesn't seem to be nearly as much criticism about the length of the article on those pages as there is here. Even other kids movies, such as The Princess Diaries, Home Alone, and Beethoven have lengthy summaries about their plots - far longer than what was written about The Mighty Ducks - and nobody seems to be voicing any complaints about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.38.121 (talk) 11:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Plot Summary

I'm changing the following line, 'The children's parents also voice their displeasure for working overtime to pay the money to enroll their kids in the league, only to see them take dives.' This is a misinterpretation of the scene. The father of the two boys was actually saying that he was giving up the chance to work overtime in order to come to his children's games, not that he needed to work overtime in order to be able to afford it. He was willing to give up overtime for to see his children play hockey, but not to see them take dives.

Why is there no mention of the plot strand involving eric and the angry/inaudible beaver who lives at the end of the road?

I feel like we are missing a trick by not including anything on what is basically the main 'theme' of the film.