User:Probios: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi. This is my ( |
Hi. This is my (PhD student & young researcher, [[biochemistry]] post-graduate and an [[autodidact]]) space @[[main page|wiki]] for original thoughts (not necessarily mine) and some useful hyperlinks for all science-inclined readers. |
||
I'm mostly interested in [[neuropsychopharmacology]] and various problems that -when solved- would be useful for others, such as cure for cancer and [[neurodegenerative diseases]]. I have worked at a biochemistry lab that mostly focused on intracellular structures called [[actins]], a [http://www.helsinki.fi/science/pharmacology/neuro/korpi/ neuropharmacology lab] focusing on addiction, and three times at [http://www.uku.fi/aivi/ A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences]; first at the [http://www.uku.fi/aivi/neuro/index_signalling.shtml Molecular signalling laboratory], then at the Cognitive neurobiology lab and |
I'm mostly interested in [[neuropsychopharmacology]] and various problems that -when solved- would be useful for others, such as cure(s) for cancer(s) and [[neurodegenerative diseases]]. I could define myself as a biocentric [[negative utilitarian]], ''i.e.'' wanting to minimize the suffering of everything that's alive. During my summers I have worked at a biochemistry lab that mostly focused on intracellular skeletal structures called [[actins]], a [http://www.helsinki.fi/science/pharmacology/neuro/korpi/ neuropharmacology lab] focusing on addiction, and three times at [http://www.uku.fi/aivi/ A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences]; first at the [http://www.uku.fi/aivi/neuro/index_signalling.shtml Molecular signalling laboratory], then at the Cognitive neurobiology lab and lastly at the [http://www.uku.fi/aivi/neuro/index_neuromem.shtml Neurobiology of memory lab], where I also did my ''pro gradu'' work. I'm now working as a young researcher at my 4th AIVI lab. |
||
[http://www.student.oulu.fi/~taneliha/Phi6 Check out] some stuff, for example articles which concern a possibility that a [[photon]] could be a [[black hole electron]] with [[toroidal]] [[topology]], which can be the same as with the [[Cosmos]].</br> |
[http://www.student.oulu.fi/~taneliha/Phi6 Check out] some stuff, for example articles which concern a possibility that a [[photon]] could be a [[black hole electron]] with [[toroidal]] [[topology]], which can be the same as with the [[Cosmos]].</br> |
||
Revision as of 03:41, 26 March 2011
Hi. This is my (PhD student & young researcher, biochemistry post-graduate and an autodidact) space @wiki for original thoughts (not necessarily mine) and some useful hyperlinks for all science-inclined readers. I'm mostly interested in neuropsychopharmacology and various problems that -when solved- would be useful for others, such as cure(s) for cancer(s) and neurodegenerative diseases. I could define myself as a biocentric negative utilitarian, i.e. wanting to minimize the suffering of everything that's alive. During my summers I have worked at a biochemistry lab that mostly focused on intracellular skeletal structures called actins, a neuropharmacology lab focusing on addiction, and three times at A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences; first at the Molecular signalling laboratory, then at the Cognitive neurobiology lab and lastly at the Neurobiology of memory lab, where I also did my pro gradu work. I'm now working as a young researcher at my 4th AIVI lab.
Check out some stuff, for example articles which concern a possibility that a photon could be a black hole electron with toroidal topology, which can be the same as with the Cosmos.
--> The smallest and the biggest physical entities with scale could look the same and both can be described with similiar superstrings.
--> Scale invariance of the topology could be possible if the hypothesis is wrong, there is recurrence of topology (given by a constant which is the difference of sizes/ratio between the two scales), or because these entities are the same. As one of my acquaintances once said regarding an idea of some kind of fractaluniverse (sic): Every thing is everything.
--> Every thing could be everything. Or prove it to be otherwise :)
Some entries to which I have contributed:
Hippocampal formation
Potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor
Metalloestrogen
Prolyl endopeptidase
Christopher Hitchens
Common misconceptions
Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything
Some random information nodes:
Order of magnitude
Category: Medical treatments
Category: Learning
Some useful external links:
Scholarpedia
sciencedaily.com
sciencenews.org
physorg.com/
eurekalert.org
Signal Transduction Cascades
Signal Transduction @ BioChemWeb.org
Metabolic Pathways map
KEGG Pathway Database
BioCyc database collection
The signaling-gateway.org
Brain Facts and Figures
Neurotransmitter.net
brainmaps.org
The Human Brain Atlas
Neuropsychology ebook
Hyperphysics
A Brief History of the Universe, hot big bang model, I personally think that ekpyrotic model of the Cosmos is more interesting.
Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive