Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grijpstra and de Gier: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
comment |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* '''Merge & Redirect''': Par down the excessive descriptions of the characters to the essence and put at the top of the above mentioned section. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 20:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
* '''Merge & Redirect''': Par down the excessive descriptions of the characters to the essence and put at the top of the above mentioned section. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 20:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge and redirect''' for the sake of building a consensus. Not enough significant coverage to [[WP:verify notability]] but maybe some of it can be salvaged as part of a broader notable article. [[User:Shooterwalker|Shooterwalker]] ([[User talk:Shooterwalker|talk]]) 03:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Merge and redirect''' for the sake of building a consensus. Not enough significant coverage to [[WP:verify notability]] but maybe some of it can be salvaged as part of a broader notable article. [[User:Shooterwalker|Shooterwalker]] ([[User talk:Shooterwalker|talk]]) 03:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge and redirect''' for the moment. There's enough to constitute its own article: Grijpstra and De Gier is a series of Dutch novels, as well as a television series, so it's notable enough. [[User:Kusonaga|Kusonaga]] ([[User talk:Kusonaga|talk]]) 09:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:19, 27 March 2011
- Grijpstra and de Gier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced nonsense about some fictional characters in a novel. Ashershow1talk•contribs 05:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment While I'm not personally familiar with the characters, I've seen the author's name, and the list of novels involving these characters suggests that Wikipedia ought to cover them in some manner--even as just redirect(s) to the relevant section of the author's article. Any ideas or preferences? Jclemens (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- How about a redirect to Janwillem van de Wetering#Grijpstra and de Gier novels? --Ashershow1talk•contribs 23:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge & Redirect: Par down the excessive descriptions of the characters to the essence and put at the top of the above mentioned section. Hasteur (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect for the sake of building a consensus. Not enough significant coverage to WP:verify notability but maybe some of it can be salvaged as part of a broader notable article. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect for the moment. There's enough to constitute its own article: Grijpstra and De Gier is a series of Dutch novels, as well as a television series, so it's notable enough. Kusonaga (talk) 09:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)