LEED: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Green Building Design & Construction''' |
'''Green Building Design & Construction''' |
||
*LEED for New Construction |
*LEED for New Construction |
||
*LEED for Core & Shell |
*LEED for Core & Shell |
||
*LEED for Schools |
*LEED for Schools |
||
*LEED for Retail: New Construction and Major Renovations |
*LEED for Retail: New Construction and Major Renovations |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
'''Green Interior Design & Construction''' |
'''Green Interior Design & Construction''' |
||
*LEED for Commercial Interiors |
|||
*LEED for Retail: Commercial Interiors |
*LEED for Retail: Commercial Interiors |
||
Revision as of 00:28, 17 April 2011
Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) is an internationally recognized green building certification system, providing third-party verification that a building or community was designed and built using strategies intended to improve performance in metrics such as energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, improved indoor environmental quality, and stewardship of resources and sensitivity to their impacts.
Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED is intended to provide building owners and operators a concise framework for identifying and implementing practical and measurable green building design, construction, operations and maintenance solutions.
Since its inception in 1998, the U.S. Green Building Council[1] has grown to encompass more than 7,000 projects in the United States and 30 countries covering 1.062 billion square feet (99 km²) of development area.[2] The hallmark of LEED is that it is an open and transparent process where the technical criteria proposed by USGBC members are publicly reviewed for approval by the almost 20,000 member organizations that currently constitute the USGBC.
The Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI) was established by USGBC to provide a series of exams to allow individuals to become accredited for their knowledge of the LEED rating system. This is recognized through either the LEED Accredited Professional (LEED AP) or LEED Green Associate (LEED Green Assoc.) designation. GBCI also provides third-party certification for projects pursuing LEED.
Rating system
LEED has evolved since its original inception in 1998 to more accurately represent and incorporate emerging green building technologies. LEED NCv1.0 was a pilot version. These projects helped inform the USGBC of the requirements for such a rating system, and this knowledge was incorporated into LEED NCv2.0. LEED NCv2.2 was released in 2005, and v3 in 2009. Today, LEED consists of a suite of nine rating systems for the design, construction and operation of buildings, homes and neighborhoods. Five overarching categories correspond to the specialties available under the LEED Accredited Professional program. That suite currently consists of:
Green Building Design & Construction
- LEED for New Construction
- LEED for Core & Shell
- LEED for Schools
- LEED for Retail: New Construction and Major Renovations
- LEED for Healthcare
Green Interior Design & Construction
- LEED for Commercial Interiors
- LEED for Retail: Commercial Interiors
Green Building Operations & Maintenance
- LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance
Green Neighborhood Development
- LEED for Neighborhood Development
Green Home Design and Construction
- LEED for Homes
LEED also forms the basis for other sustainability rating systems such as the Environmental Protection Agency's Labs21.
After four years of development, aligning credits across all LEED rating systems and weighting credits based on environmental priority, USGBC launched LEED v3,[3] which consists of a new continuous development process, a new version of LEED Online, a revised third-party certification program and a new suite of rating systems known as LEED 2009. In response to concerns that LEED's requirements are cumbersome and difficult to learn, in 2009 USGBC supported the development by BuildingGreen, LLC of LEEDuser, a third-party resource that contains tips and guidance, written by professionals in the field, on applying LEED credits and the LEED certification process.[4]
LEED 2009
In LEED 2009 there are 100 possible base points plus an additional 6 points for Innovation in Design and 4 points for Regional Priority. Buildings can qualify for four levels of certification:
- Certified - 40 - 49 points
- Silver - 50 - 59 points
- Gold - 60 - 79 points
- Platinum - 80 points and above
- Note that the LEED for Homes rating system is different from LEED v3, with different point categories and thresholds that reward efficient residential design.
Prerequisites and Credits
Points are distributed across major credit categories such as Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy and Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, and Indoor Environmental Quality. Prerequisites in each category receive no points and are mandatory for all projects.
LEED Canada
In 2003, the Canada Green Building Council received permission to create LEED Canada-NC v1.0, which was based upon LEED-NC 2.0.[6] This version was updated and released on June 21, 2010 to LEED Canada NC 2009.
Process
LEED certification is obtained after submitting an application documenting compliance with the requirements of the rating system as well as paying registration and certification fees. Certification is granted solely by the Green Building Certification Institute responsible for the third party verification of project compliance with LEED requirements.
Recently the application process for new construction certification has been streamlined electronically, via a set of active PDFs that automates the process of filing the documentation.
Effectiveness
A 2003 analysis of the savings from green building found from a review of 60 LEED buildings that the buildings were on average 25-30% more energy efficient, but it also attributed substantial benefits to the increased productivity from the better ventilation, temperature control, lighting control, and reduced indoor air pollution.[7]
As of 2008, LEED (and similar Energy Star) buildings had mostly been evaluated by case studies. From a purely financial perspective, in 2008 several studies found that LEED for-rent office spaces generally charged higher rent and had higher occupancy rates. CoStar collects data on properties. The extra cost for the minimum benefit has been estimated at 3%, with an additional 2.5% for silver.[8] More recent studies have confirmed these earlier findings in that certified buildings achieve significantly higher rents, sale prices and occupancy rates as well as lower capitalization rates potentially reflecting lower investment risk.[9][10][11][12]
LEED focuses on the design of the building and not on its actual energy consumption, and therefore it has suggested that LEED buildings should be tracked to discover whether the potential energy savings from the design are being used in practice.[13]
Directory of LEED Certified Projects
The U.S. Green Building Council provides an online directory of U.S. LEED-certified projects.[14]
The Canada Green Building Council provides an online directory of LEED Canada-certified projects.
Professional accreditation
The Green Building Certification Institute describes Professional Accreditation as follows "LEED Professional Credentials demonstrate current knowledge of green building technologies, best practices, and the rapidly evolving LEED Rating Systems. They show differentiation in a growing and competitive industry, and they allow for varied levels of specialization. A LEED Professional Credential provides employers, policymakers, and other stakeholders with assurances of an individual’s level of competence and is the mark of the most qualified, educated, and influential green building professionals in the marketplace."[15]
Benefits and disadvantages
![]() |
LEED certified buildings are supposed to use resources more efficiently when compared to conventional buildings simply built to code. LEED certified buildings often provide healthier work and living environments, which contributes to higher productivity and improved employee health and comfort. The USGBC has compiled a long list of benefits of implementing a LEED strategy, which ranges from improving air and water quality to reducing solid waste, benefiting owners, occupiers, and society as a whole.[citation needed]
Often, when a LEED rating is pursued, the cost of initial design and construction rises. One reason for the higher cost is that sustainable construction principles may not be well understood by the design professionals undertaking the project. This could require time to be spent on research. Some of the finer points of LEED (especially those that demand a higher-than-industry-standard level of service from the construction team) could possibly lead to misunderstandings between the design team, construction team, and client, which could result in delays. [citation needed] Also, there may be a lack of abundant availability of manufactured building components that meet LEED specifications. Pursuing LEED certification for a project is an added cost in itself as well. This added cost comes in the form of USGBC correspondence, LEED design-aide consultants, and the hiring of the required Commissioning Authority (CxA)—all of which would not necessarily be included in an environmentally responsible project, unless it also sought a LEED rating.[citation needed]
However, these higher initial costs can be effectively mitigated by the savings incurred over time due to the lower-than-industry-standard operational costs typical of a LEED certified building. This Life Cycle Costing is a method for assessing the total cost of ownership, taking into account all costs of acquiring, owning and operating, and the eventual disposal of a building. Additional economic payback may come in the form of employee productivity gains incurred as a result of working in a healthier environment. Studies have suggested that an initial up-front investment of 2% extra will yield over ten times the initial investment over the life cycle of the building.[16]
Further, the USGBC has stated support for the Architecture 2030, an effort that has set a goal of using no fossil-fuel, greenhouse gas-emitting energy to operate by 2030.[17]
In the progression of sustainable design from simply meeting local buildings codes to USGBC LEED (Certified, Silver, Gold and Platinum) to the Architecture 2030 Challenge, the Living Building Challenge is currently the most stringent sustainable design protocol. The LBC sets 20 imperatives which compel building owners, designers, operators and tenants beyond current USGBC LEED rating levels.
LEED is a design tool and not a performance measurement tool. It is also not yet climate-specific, although the newest version hopes to address this weakness partially. Because of this, designers may make materials or design choices that garner a LEED point, even though they may not be the most site or climate-appropriate choice available.
LEED is a measurement tool for green building in the United States and it is developed and continuously modified by workers in the green building industry, especially in the ten largest metro areas in the U.S.; however, LEED certified buildings have been slower to penetrate small and mid-major markets.[18] Also, some criticism suggests that the LEED rating system is not sensitive and does not vary enough with regard to local environmental conditions. For instance, a building in Maine would receive the same credit as a building in Arizona for water conservation, though the principle is more important in the latter case. Another complaint is that its certification costs require money that could be used to make the building in question even more sustainable. Many critics have noted that compliance and certification costs have grown faster than staff support from the USGBC.
For existing buildings LEED has developed LEED-EB. Recent research has demonstrated that buildings that can achieve LEED-EB equivalencies can generate a tremendous ROI[citation needed]. In a recent white paper by the Leonardo Academy comparing LEED-EB buildings vs. data from BOMA’s Experience Exchange Report 2007 demonstrated LEED-EB certified buildings achieved superior operating cost savings in 63% of the buildings surveyed ranging from $4.94 to $15.59 per square foot of floor space, with an average valuation of $6.68 and a median valuation of $6.07.[19]
In addition the overall cost of LEED-EB implementation and certification ranged from $0.00 to $6.46 per square foot of floor space, with an average of $2.43 per square foot demonstrating that implementation is not expensive, especially in comparison to cost savings. These costs should be significantly reduced if automation and technology are integrated into the implementation.[19]
Incentive programs
Many federal, state, and local governments and school districts have adopted various types of LEED initiatives and incentives. A full listing of government and school LEED initiatives can be found online[20] and is updated regularly.
Some areas have implemented or are considering incentives for LEED-certified buildings.
The city of Cincinnati, Ohio adopted a measure providing an automatic 100% real property tax exemption of the assessed property value for newly constructed or rehabilitated commercial or residential properties that earn a minimum of LEED Certified.[21]
In the state of Nevada construction materials for a qualifying LEED building are exempt from local taxes. Pieces of construction that are deemed "inseparable" parts, such as concrete or Sheetrock, qualify.[22]
The state of Michigan is considering tax-based incentives for LEED buildings.[23]
Many local governments have adopted LEED incentive programs. Program incentives include tax credits, tax breaks, density bonuses, reduced fees, priority or expedited permitting, free or reduced-cost technical assistance, grants and low-interest loans.[24][25]
See also
- U.S. Green Building Council
- Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing
- Design Impact Measures
- Ecological footprint
- Energy conservation
- Environmental design
- Green Globes
- High-Performance Green Buildings
- Passive house
- Renewable energy
- Sustainable architecture
- BREEAM
- Code for Sustainable Homes
Notes
- ^ LEED for existing buildings v2.0 reference guide page pg 11
- ^ "Green Building By the Numbers". USGBC. Retrieved 2008-12-01.,
- ^ "LEEDv3". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 20 February 2010.
- ^ "LEED Update December 2009". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
- ^ Plumb, Tierney (October 8, 2009). "1225 Connecticut Avenue gets LEED Platinum". Washington Business Journal. Retrieved June 21, 2010.
- ^ Canada Green Building Council: Green Building Rating System
- ^ Kats GH. (2003). [www.masstech.org/rebate/green_buildings/GreenBuildingspaper.pdf Green building costs and financial benefits]. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.
- ^ N Miller, J Spivey, A Florance. (2008). Does Green Pay Off? Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management Preprint.
- ^ Miller,Norman. [1] Retrieved: November 5, 2010
- ^ Fuerst, Franz; McAllister, Pat. Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Property Values. 2009. [2] Retrieved: November 5, 2010
- ^ Pivo, Gary; Fisher, Jeffrey D. Investment Returns from Responsible Property Investments: Energy Efficient, Transit-oriented and Urban Regeneration Office Properties in the US from 1998-2008. 2009.[3] Retrieved: November 5, 2010
- ^ Fuerst, Franz; McAllister, Pat. An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates. 2009.[4] Retrieved: November 5, 2010
- ^ Appelbaum A. (2010). Don’t LEED Us Astray. NYTimes.
- ^ "LEED Projects Directory - Certified Project Directory". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
- ^ http://www.gbci.org/main-nav/professional-credentials/credentials.aspx
- ^ Kats, Greg (2003). "The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-10-30.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "The 2030 Challenge". architecture2030.org.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ Burr, Andrew C. (April 23, 2008). "LEED's Big Market Bias". CoStar Group. Retrieved 2008-04-27.
- ^ a b Going Green....Is it the 800lb Elephant in the Room?
- ^ "Tax Deductions and Incentives. The Vinyl Roofing Division of the Chemical Fabrics and Film Association".
- ^ "LEED Initiatives in Government and Schools".
- ^ "Exemption for LEED Certified Green Buildings".
- ^ "LEED Tax Credits Coming?".
- ^ "Summary of Government LEED Incentives".
- ^ "Public Policy Search".
References
- Green Building Facts [Data file]. (n.d.). US Green Building Council. Retrieved June 27, 2009.
- Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The Costs and Financial Benefeits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force [Report]. United States Green Building Council.
- Lucuik, M., Trusty, W., Larsson, N., & Charette, R. (2005). A Business Case for Green Building in Canada: Presented to Industry Canada [Report]. United States Green Building Council.
- United States Green Building Council. (2006, August). Foundations of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Environmental Rating System, A Tool for Market Transformation [Policy Manual].
- The Vinyl Roofing Division of the Chemical Fabrics and Film Association. LEED Retrieved April 2, 2010.
- The Vinyl Roofing Division of the Chemical Fabrics and Film Association. Tax Deductions and Incentives, Retrieved April 2, 2010.
- Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from December 2009
- Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certified buildings
- Sustainable building
- Sustainable building in the United States
- Building energy rating
- Environment of the United States
- Building engineering
- Energy in the United States
- Environmental design