Talk:Woods Coffee

This is obviously being used as an advertisement space. Unless there is anything substantive not coming from the woods' IP addresses, then it should be slated for deletion.

All Woods Coffee edits should be suspect for advertisement bias/ non-objective. The advertisement banner remains will remain.

140.160.117.250 (talk) 19:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Aldnonymous, why did you take off last two edits? 140.160.117.250 (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:UNDUE--Ald™ ¬_¬™ 20:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

allright, so take off the facebook citation. the boycott bit still stands, and so does the advert. can you request editorial review? i am busy right now. 140.160.117.250 (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

then why u have a time to make that edit...? NO. i won't make any edit that violate WP:NPOV neither i do want to make an edit based on WP:NOR thank you. --Ald™ ¬_¬™ 20:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

NOTE : i won't remove your tag since it's true that it "is written like an advertisement" and yeah i support that tag. thank for your contribution(s).--Ald™ ¬_¬™ 20:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

thanks. i am not trying to be DE. I have to go to class. I'll wait till the bellingham herald publishes something on the boycott to add that on. thanks. 140.160.117.250 (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree that you should wait to post the boycott information section until it has been published by a more reliable source. Thanks for dialoguing here. I hope we can come to an equitable agreement and a fairly-written piece on this page. 76.121.45.254 (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)