Talk:Shtokman field: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:37, 2 May 2011

Russia B‑class Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy B‑class Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Energy portal news

As both names--Stockman and Russian transcription Shtokman--are in use, the article probably has to refer to both. Beagel 22:41, 9 September 2006

I'm based in Moscow and work as a journalist in the Oil and Gas Industry, and I've never seen the transliteration 'Stockman' used. 'Shtokman' is the standard and I would argue it's the only one that should be used on this page. Proletarskaya 11.11 Moscow time 18 August 2007

C'mon, just try "Stockman field" by Google search. Quite commonly used. Beagel 08:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea after whom the field was named? Name sounds bit like Russian version of German name (Stockmann) --Mikko Paananen 20:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can'to say for sure, but Russians have a research vessel "Professor Shtokman". Also, there are seveal quite famous Russians by name Shtokman (or Stockman or Stockmann). Beagel 17:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is presently no approved plan for development and operation of the Shtokman discovery. Hence, the proper term for the discovery is "technical resources", or simply "resources" and not "reserves", as is says now. 62.92.82.10 08:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ref

For soem reason this refernce won't work, its for the bit about Total becoming the new partner with 25%. ^[1]

Nuclear controversy

What is the reason for the inclusion of this section - the rumour from Aftenposten has been denied. Bellona is well known campaigner regarding the nuclear submarine reactors standing in the Kola peninsula but this has nothing to do with the Shtokman project. Is this a bit of free advertising for Bellona or is there further proof regarding a nuclear installation in Shtokman besides the Aftenposten claim? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrustyJules (talk • contribs) 07:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as noone has come forward a month and a half later I have removed the Nuclear Controversey issue as being irrelevant.

^ The Kremlin-controlled gas monopoly has chosen France's Total as its partner in the giant Shtokman gas field, The Times online, July 12, 2007

[TheTimes-1] The Kremlin-controlled gas monopoly has chosen France's Total as its partner in the giant Shtokman gas field, The Times online, July 12, 2007

[1]

Revision as of 07:45, 17 March 2011 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,553,283 edits m Signing comment by TrustyJules - "→Nuclear controversy: new section" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:37, 2 May 2011 edit undo TrustyJules (talk \| contribs) 36 edits →Nuclear controversy Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:

	What is the reason for the inclusion of this section - the rumour from Aftenposten has been denied. Bellona is well known campaigner regarding the nuclear submarine reactors standing in the Kola peninsula but this has nothing to do with the Shtokman project. Is this a bit of free advertising for Bellona or is there further proof regarding a nuclear installation in Shtokman besides the Aftenposten claim? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TrustyJules\|TrustyJules]] ([[User talk:TrustyJules\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TrustyJules\|contribs]]) 07:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		What is the reason for the inclusion of this section - the rumour from Aftenposten has been denied. Bellona is well known campaigner regarding the nuclear submarine reactors standing in the Kola peninsula but this has nothing to do with the Shtokman project. Is this a bit of free advertising for Bellona or is there further proof regarding a nuclear installation in Shtokman besides the Aftenposten claim? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TrustyJules\|TrustyJules]] ([[User talk:TrustyJules\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TrustyJules\|contribs]]) 07:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


			Seeing as noone has come forward a month and a half later I have removed the Nuclear Controversey issue as being irrelevant.