:::::::::She has so many wigs, I doubt she even recognises her own hair from plastines. Like her mole ("It's not a mole, it's surreal") — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 09:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
:::::::::She has so many wigs, I doubt she even recognises her own hair from plastines. Like her mole ("It's not a mole, it's surreal") — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 09:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
::::::::::I read somewhere that her hair is falling out coz she keeps dying it... Anyway, I've got school tomorrow *sigh* so I better head to bed. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 10:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
::::::::::I read somewhere that her hair is falling out coz she keeps dying it... Anyway, I've got school tomorrow *sigh* so I better head to bed. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 10:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
== Judas - The Remixes ==
Hello Legolas2186,
Thank you for correcting my post, I just noticed I made an error while citing the webpage. However, I am going to change "The Remixes" back to "Judas – The Remixes" since that is the correct title of the album, I don't know if you have noticed but the same applied to the "Born This Way" remixes (part 1 & 2). Have a good day! :)
Hey, sorry... Do you think minor wardrobe alterations in an tour are worth mentioning? Like if at the beginning of a tour, the star wears a blue skirt and by the end she ends up wearing a purple skirt. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message02:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like I'm always asking you for stuff and apologizing for it. But I'm not gonna stop :P Anyways, I really need help on the commercial outcome of the Best of Both Worlds Tour. I have two links and that's it -.- I definitely need more. Can you please help? BTW, i ended up making a section for the body double scandal. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message21:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have you tried webcite archives to check if they have the archived links for billboard.com/bbbiz/currentscvore.jsp? Thats more easier than me finding through all of them. — Legolas(talk2me)07:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Take any of the archived links from The Monster Ball Tour Box office score webcite links. Now on the right hand side, there will be a date tab where it will list you all the archives for that link under different dates. Search through those dates around Cyrus' tour. — Legolas(talk2me)08:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't want to abuse of you. I know your condition inhibits you doing so much and to do something you don't even want to must be horrible. Is Eric still hibernating? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message20:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He never responded though. I left another message on his wall. Hopefully he answers, I'm only missing that section. I even finished the complicated "Ticket controversy" section. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message03:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fever
Hi Legolas,
Yes I do remember you, of course, and I'm glad to have heard from you again. I'm sorry that there has been such a delay in my replying. I have two books that go up to the Fever timeframe, so if you could just let me know what kind of information you're looking for, I'll see if there's anything suitable. The books are:
Baker, William; Minogue, Kylie, La La La, Hodder & Stoughton, 2002. ISBN 0-340-73439-6
Smith, Sean, Kylie Confidential, Michael O'Mara Books Limited, 2002. ISBN 1-85479-415-9
(The second one is as cheesy as the unimaginative title suggests, but there may still be something useful in it.)
I've looked through both books - Kylie Confidential is useless trash. I may as well throw it in the rubbish bin. There's nothing suitable and the author should be thoroughly ashamed of himself for producing a "biography" of an artist and not discussing the most successful phase of her career. La La La has some suitable material, although it's almost entirely from the POV of Minogue and/or William Baker. I'll update the article myself as time permits. There's not much, especially in the background of the album, but there are a few interesting things, such as how they approached choosing the album cover artwork etc. I don't think it's what you were looking for, but I'll contribute these few points to the article as time permits. Cheers Rossrs (talk) 00:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Two days without editing made me think you had broken your other hand Legolas (lol you'd be typing like this). Anyways, did you manage to find the Music Week issue? Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol Ada, I kinda thought the same thing too :D Legolas, can you do a little something for me? I'd like to know the peak, issue and volume of the song "Here We Go Again" by Ray Charles and Norah Jones, released in 2004. It charted on the Bubbling Under chart. Novice7 (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thought you would like it... sigh. Never mind, Andy then :P Yes, Maghu, after I give some magic to the two new Gaga craps which have sprung up. — Legolas(talk2me)09:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Me too Ada, can I call you Andy??? Thank youu Legolas :D Yeah, they need some meat.. Btw, you know they're nomed for Deletion?? Novice7 (talk) 09:52, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, I'm sorry for causing edit conflicts Andy :D I usually get around five when I try to post on Legolas' talk page :) Novice7 (talk) 10:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Coming from the "Run the World" remix, I think it is fantastic, especially since I had no good thoughts about the original. Yet, am I the only one who notices the sample of the singing chorus from the end of Weird Al's "Amish Paradise?" It sounds cool, but what an odd sample. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо02:49, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Yoü and I"
Even though you voted for the deletion of "Yoü and I", if you see any way to help expand the article any assistance would be much appreciated. Apart from the additional sources yet to be added, I think the article could be expanded even with the sources already used. I understand if you are uninterested--I am just trying to recruit quality contributors to help if possible. Thanks! --Another Believer(Talk)15:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I truly appreciate your efforts in trying to build up the article, but at present it fails WP:GNG on so many grounds, that I'm spellbound. I do believe that eventually this might gain enough notability ala "Speechless", till then I have mixed feelings regarding it. I will of course try and help you expanding it. (PS: I couldn't help but noyice that you called me quality contributer :P) — Legolas(talk2me)16:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ha! Well, I certainly respect your work. If much of "Judas" is your work too, well done! Any assistance with expansion would be much appreciated. I especially need help fleshing out the prose, a skill you appear to have. --Another Believer(Talk)16:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Sorry, perhaps my definition of GNG is skewed. In my opinion, there are enough independent, reliable sources discussing that song that allow it to have its own article. I just don't see the point of deleting the article, especially if there is potential (at least a merge would save the article history). Thanks for any help with "Y&I"...--Another Believer(Talk)16:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There in lies the problem because all sources talk about the live performed song, not the album version. Hence it would be premature to add a composition I believe. — Legolas(talk2me)16:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I added a few more sources. Once you have completed your work at TEOG, I could use assistance gathering details from the sources already incorporated into the "You and I" article and finding new ones to add. I think you are better at expanding articles and knowing which details to include (I must have a list-oriented brain, as many of the articles I work on are lists). I am not sure how much detail to include for the Reinhart cover, but there are quite a few sources online relating to her performance as well as the studio recording. If the studio version is released as a single or appears on an American Idol-related album, those details would also be worth noting. Thanks again for offering to help! --Another Believer(Talk)23:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes nice owrk on it. Would you mind a little reformatting? The dates need to be in yyyy-mm-dd format per WP:GAGA, since the primary Gaga articles are structured in a similar manner. — Legolas(talk2me)08:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if you found anything else to add to the article or if you still felt that it needed to be deleted (given your AfD vote) regardless of the fact that the song will be released very soon and there will be more reception details to add, etc.? --Another Believer(Talk)03:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm waiting for consensus on the Afd actually, finding sources is not a big deal at all for me. I can whiff up the article to GA class even now, lol, just waiting. — Legolas(talk2me)04:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Why wait? Your contributions could impact the AfD discussion. (BTW: I am amazed at all the icons every time I go to your profile page--well done!) --Another Believer(Talk)15:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I added two sources to the talk page relating to the airing of Gaga's HBO performance on American Idol. Not sure if this is notable or not. If it is, I am not sure how to incorporate it into the article (in the Live performances section or following Reinhart's Idol performance in the Cover versions section). --Another Believer(Talk)16:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Information like transmission should be affter the live performance. Like for Y&I, you should include it just after you talk about the Monster Ball performances. Its still Gaga's performance albeit recorded live. And what icons? — Legolas(talk2me)16:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If I was a closetted ghey (gay) boy, this would be the song I would play to my parents before telling them, "Mommy, I like a different 69." I absolutely adore it though, great 80s throwback, ok production, wonderful lyrics + vocals. — Legolas(talk2me)04:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I actually really like that song, one of her best IMO. Anyways any suggestions for We R Who We R?, i think i might just PR it because i cant think of anything else to add, its FA ready they just dont like about.com -__- - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 05:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking about that but ill lose an insane amount of prose under Critical and Composition, so its not really worth it, -sigh- he needs his own website. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 05:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, thanks. Btw, does Sheetmusicplus or Musicnotes have the sheet music for W. Houston's "Try It on My Own", "Whatchulookinat", "Love That Man" or "One of Those Days"? Novice7 (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I searched and I couldn't find any. Maybe Sony did not publish the book as Just Whitney was a flop :D Oh well, she's back in rehab, getting ready to act again :) Novice7 (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, rehab + gym. Take a look at this :) She has agreed to act as "Savannah Jackson" on Waiting to Exhale's sequel Getting to Happy. Maybe, she needed to get back in shape. And, lol isn't Winehouse in rehab too? Or has she exited? Novice7 (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That sequel title really made me laugh for some reason. Good for her though, as for Winehouse, did she ever leave rehab? I thought she was made a permanent customer. — Legolas(talk2me)16:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, yes. The title is funny. Maybe it's just the proposed title :D Lmao, I remember once seeing that she had left rehab and then a few days later I saw that she enrolled again :D Maybe she's permanent =D Novice7 (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like agenda pushing user. See Jivesh, in your editing time, you will face many users who will criticize your every move and try to downplay it by calling everything you add as "fancruft". Don't get disheartened, just see if there are any valid points, if not, just plain ignore. — Legolas(talk2me)04:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You need to tell me the artist name and song name, because that link will directly take me to the login page, and even after login, it won't show me, so anyways I have to go through chart search. — Legolas(talk2me)13:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, its J. Simpson's "Irresistible" (only entry position needed. I think it's May 5, 2001). Also, if possible, can you give me the Bubbling Under position for Ray Charles and Norah Jones' "Here We Go Again"? It charted in 2004. Thanks. Novice7 (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you meant Bubbling Under? If so, its 5. For Snorah Jones, its 5-2-5-9-10, the peak on March 5, 2005. It also charted for one week on Hot Digital Tracks, at 129. — Legolas(talk2me)13:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing special. Just lots of wishes, kisses, shake-hands, gifts and so on. Thanks for wishing me Legolas. By the way, you wished me in Urdu. I am not Muslim. In fact, i have Indian origin. I do not know from where my grandparents came. Lol. Jivesh • Talk2Me15:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What gifts did you get? Beyonce's new album?? :P And, umm, who exactly kissed you and where? Novice I mean the US Hot Digital Tracks, Canada doesnot have any hot digital track chart. And its for HWGA. — Legolas(talk2me)15:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Some female teachers, some girls (friends only), my parents, my sister, my grandparents, my neighbors, my dogs. Lol. It was restricted to both cheeks only for this time naughty Legoman. Jivesh • Talk2Me15:35, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in fact they know me since i was 12 years old. I had a crush on one of them when i was young. Lol. Just infatuation. It has passed now. What? You want to see my picture? Down............. Ummmm i myself do not know for the time being but i will surely tell you next year, naughty boy. I know what you mean but i am a bit shy to say it. Lol. About my gifts, actually we do not have original CDs of international artist in my countries. I do not even own a single album of Beyonce. I listen to her songs on you-tube or take them from my friends via bluetooth on mobile phones. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My dear friend, i felt so nice talking to you and i wish i could continue this little interesting chat but i really have to go. Forgive me, it's urgent. Hope we will talk very soon. Thanks for always being here. I wonder what Wikipedia would have been without you. Bye.Take are of yourself and your beautiful wife. lol. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done! I suppose repetitive things such as table conversions are especially difficult with one hand, right? :-) So basically you have to name the headers with scope="col" and scope="row" and use "wikitable plainrowheaders" so that the rows aren't bolded. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually opposite. If its a repetitive thing, I can use MS Word and use the Ctrl+H function. I did not know this was also repetitive. But thanks a dime. And I commented at "Single Ladies". :P — Legolas(talk2me)05:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any Rolling Stone issues, or do you know any other way to source the 100 Best Songs of the Decade? A meagre page number and date would be a life saver. If not, do you think Stereogum's analysis would cut it as reliable (owned by Buzz Media)? Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:39, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, do you know what page number the UK R&B Chart is on on the Music Week issue of January 18, 2009? I know I'm asking a lot; sorry! I'll do something to make up for it lol. (Listen to me, grovelling at your feet...) Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gimme some time, about to have some good lunch. (Rice and Chicken curry) I have to bring down the Rolling Stone mags. I keep them bound by year. :) Anyways the 100 best songs of 00's was on 2010-01-23 issue I believe. I have to look the volume. — Legolas(talk2me)09:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you remember, but that video that you gave to me about the Kylie interview on Fever, I have FINALLY found time to add information from that to the article. Now, I think you said you knew how to source it? --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо01:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is a YouTube video, but I've been told that YouTube is unreliable for such information. It isn't even from her official channel. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо02:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No silly boy, of course it should be sourced. But remember, adding an url is not always mandatory. For eg: when you use book references, you use {{cite book}} template, but do we use any url? No. Its similar to the intervies. Cite the episode, channel, date, time, interview length, presenter name etc. that should do. — Legolas(talk2me)13:37, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, URLs are helpful, but a lot of videos on YouTube are copyvios. YouTube links should only be included if they are uploaded by the copyright holder ie an official channel. Adabow (talk · contribs) 20:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re:Meat dress of Lady Gag
Hi there,
Thanks for your comments regarding the article. I've got to admit I only created it due to a combination of a remark from Gaga on the Graham Norton show about the dress being made into jerky and that I recently saw Black Versace dress of Elizabeth Hurley go through the DYK process.
Based on the Hurley dress, I think that the Gaga dress has an even stronger case for the free image that is currently on the article as the Hurley dress still gets shown in exhibitions and would appear the same as when it was originally worn - whereas the Gaga dress has been preserved in a way that has changed the actual fabric of the outfit and would affect the appearance. While there would be no chance of the image being used as fair use anywhere else considering that there are free use images of Lady Gaga available, I think in the absence of a free use image of the dress itself that there is a very strong case for using the image on the article specifically about the dress. The only thing I could potentially see as replacing it would either be that a free use image taken at the VMA's becomes available or if someone made an exact replica of it (only replicas of it I've seen are inspired by and not direct copies) and a free use image became available of that. Miyagawa(talk)18:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I picked the crocodile image so it would match the title =D I'm glad to hear that you're doing better. If you don't mind me asking, what type of injury did you get/what happened. When I broke me leg and had to learn to walk again physical therapy was just hell. Best of wishes!! Crystal Clear x305:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch, that sucks. I was gonna suggest leading the pedestrian life, but then I remember that my injury was from getting hit by a car, so traveling on foot isn't much safer! =o Crystal Clear x307:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I explained there why the genre thing is like that. As for RedOne, I feel a Timbaland-esque scenario coming pretty soon. (I like "Dirty Dancer" though.) — Legolas(talk2me)09:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Musically, if he doesn't change the dance-beats soon. Its all the same 120 bpm progression he's choosing nowadays, right from "On the Floor". Gaga gave him the platform, but have you noticed that while others are latching on to him, Gaga is slowly moving towards a different direction musically and sonically. ReOne should also learn that. — Legolas(talk2me)09:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I read somewhere that her hair is falling out coz she keeps dying it... Anyway, I've got school tomorrow *sigh* so I better head to bed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Judas - The Remixes
Hello Legolas2186,
Thank you for correcting my post, I just noticed I made an error while citing the webpage. However, I am going to change "The Remixes" back to "Judas – The Remixes" since that is the correct title of the album, I don't know if you have noticed but the same applied to the "Born This Way" remixes (part 1 & 2). Have a good day! :)
