Talk:Peak food: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:39, 26 May 2011

Food and drink Redirect‑class

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Redirect

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

slanted

I agree with the article completely. And that's not a good sign for Wikipedia... We present basically one point of view on the topic. I guess we should at least tone it down, and probably expand with different predictions. --174.119.186.126 (talk) 04:20, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-- no offence to the author but it reads like a year 7 high school essay, this article is not NPO and should be largly rewritten —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.154.192 (talk) 06:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Civilization#Future

Why does anyone want to add that to Wikilink "coming in the future"? It no sense makes. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:40, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reference 1 == reference 2

The second referenced article is nothing but a verbatim copy of the first article. Claiming them as two different sources misrepresents the number of sources. Ender8282 (talk) 03:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced second reference Ender8282 (talk) 03:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == reference 1 == reference 2 ==
-The second referenced article is nothing but a verbatim copy of the first article.  Claiming them as two different sources misrepresents the number of sources.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ender8282|Ender8282]] ([[User talk:Ender8282|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ender8282|contribs]]) 03:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+The second referenced article is nothing but a verbatim copy of the first article.  Claiming them as two different sources misrepresents the number of sources.  [[User:Ender8282|Ender8282]] ([[User talk:Ender8282|talk]]) 03:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
+I have replaced second reference [[User:Ender8282|Ender8282]] ([[User talk:Ender8282|talk]]) 03:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)