User talk:Juliancolton: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 32. |
TehGrauniad (talk | contribs) →RFC for user TreasuryTag: new section |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<span style="cursor: crosshair;">--[[User:Σ|<span style="cursor: crosshair;">Σ</span>]] [[User talk:Σ|<sub style="font-size: 80%;cursor: crosshair;">☭</sub><sup style="margin-left:-2ex;cursor:crosshair;">★</sup>]]</span> 22:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
<span style="cursor: crosshair;">--[[User:Σ|<span style="cursor: crosshair;">Σ</span>]] [[User talk:Σ|<sub style="font-size: 80%;cursor: crosshair;">☭</sub><sup style="margin-left:-2ex;cursor:crosshair;">★</sup>]]</span> 22:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== RFC for user TreasuryTag == |
|||
Hello! I was upset by the way that TreasuryTag had behaved on a recent AFD ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry (Fawlty Towers)]]). TreasuryTag really made the AFD environment hostile, and for that reason I'm going to try to raise an RFC. The RfC process is geared towards a single dispute, and requires that two people attest to having tried to bring the dispute to the user's attention on their talk page, and that this intervention failed. I am putting myself forward as one of these editors, and I have described you as the other (for commenting on TreasuryTag’s placement of a ‘Welcome to wikipedia’ note on. If you agree with my RFC request then could you please sign it at the 'Attempts by certifier C2' section? It is temporarily here ([[User:TehGrauniad/Sandbox1|here]]) while I get some feedback on it from here ([[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct/Assistance#Help_with_RfC| here]]). |
|||
My interest in this is that I'm a fairly new user, and have never been involved in a dispute with TreasuryTag, however was put off voting on the AFD process in question. All best, Chris (aka) [[User:TehGrauniad|TehGrauniad]] ([[User talk:TehGrauniad|talk]]) 15:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:59, 28 May 2011
Erm...
You could just have said so you know... ╟─TreasuryTag►Acting Returning Officer─╢ 19:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
storms
Thought you might enjoy this. — Ched : ? 02:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
FAC of Hurricane Michael (2000)
Hello Julian Colton, I am strongly considering re-nominating Hurricane Michael (2000) for FAC. I am notifying you about this because you are one of the "major contributors" of the article. Regards,--12george1 (talk) 03:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Works for me. I would suggest completely cutting out the last paragraph of the lead, which seems like a random collection of trivial facts, and the firs sentence of the lead seems a little odd. Other than that, I think it's a very decent article for all the polishing you've done to it. Juliancolton (talk) 10:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Messages
Hello. You have a new message at User:Σ's talk page.
--Σ ☭★ 22:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
RFC for user TreasuryTag
Hello! I was upset by the way that TreasuryTag had behaved on a recent AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry (Fawlty Towers)). TreasuryTag really made the AFD environment hostile, and for that reason I'm going to try to raise an RFC. The RfC process is geared towards a single dispute, and requires that two people attest to having tried to bring the dispute to the user's attention on their talk page, and that this intervention failed. I am putting myself forward as one of these editors, and I have described you as the other (for commenting on TreasuryTag’s placement of a ‘Welcome to wikipedia’ note on. If you agree with my RFC request then could you please sign it at the 'Attempts by certifier C2' section? It is temporarily here (here) while I get some feedback on it from here ( here).
My interest in this is that I'm a fairly new user, and have never been involved in a dispute with TreasuryTag, however was put off voting on the AFD process in question. All best, Chris (aka) TehGrauniad (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)