Jump to content

User talk:Overpush: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sockpuppetry case: new section
Overpush (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|}
|}
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] case. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rageholic Filled With Rageahol]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to cases]] before editing the evidence page. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD|talk]]) 15:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] case. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rageholic Filled With Rageahol]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to cases]] before editing the evidence page. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD|talk]]) 15:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

{{unblock|I am not a sockpuppet. If you looked at my edit history, I have made several TV related edits. I found the [[Move Closer to Your World]] deletion proposal after clicking on the link from [[WPIX]]. I thought I put forward a reasonable argument there and had no idea sockpuppetry was involved. Please provide your evidence. I would also like a CheckUser. Apparently I picked the wrong time to return to Wikipdedia.}}
{{SPI case status|curequest}}

Revision as of 21:26, 1 June 2011

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rageholic Filled With Rageahol for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Overpush (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. If you looked at my edit history, I have made several TV related edits. I found the Move Closer to Your World deletion proposal after clicking on the link from WPIX. I thought I put forward a reasonable argument there and had no idea sockpuppetry was involved. Please provide your evidence. I would also like a CheckUser. Apparently I picked the wrong time to return to Wikipdedia.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a sockpuppet. If you looked at my edit history, I have made several TV related edits. I found the [[Move Closer to Your World]] deletion proposal after clicking on the link from [[WPIX]]. I thought I put forward a reasonable argument there and had no idea sockpuppetry was involved. Please provide your evidence. I would also like a CheckUser. Apparently I picked the wrong time to return to Wikipdedia. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet. If you looked at my edit history, I have made several TV related edits. I found the [[Move Closer to Your World]] deletion proposal after clicking on the link from [[WPIX]]. I thought I put forward a reasonable argument there and had no idea sockpuppetry was involved. Please provide your evidence. I would also like a CheckUser. Apparently I picked the wrong time to return to Wikipdedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet. If you looked at my edit history, I have made several TV related edits. I found the [[Move Closer to Your World]] deletion proposal after clicking on the link from [[WPIX]]. I thought I put forward a reasonable argument there and had no idea sockpuppetry was involved. Please provide your evidence. I would also like a CheckUser. Apparently I picked the wrong time to return to Wikipdedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.