User talk:Toug ma Tojer

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like my account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all.

To continue editing, I made a new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some child then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Bullshit. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden.

Look, you guys seem to think that there is something so mystically difficult about your website that folks cannot work out how to edit it. Bullshit to that too. Any coder or sysadmin with half a brain could.

So there are these Irish guys like HighKing, Rashers and Cailil on a campaign to remove the term British Isles from the Wikipedia. It is all over the internet. One of them, tries to stick me with the names of a whole load of others he has rubbed up and fails ... why? Because I am not any of them.

Therefore I want the same right as "anyone" to edit the Wikipedia. Remember that? The Encyclopedia anyone can edit" not "anyone that agrees with the Irish".

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks will not be considered. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Where is the personal attack? I have just stated the facts of the events. If there is anyone that ought to be offended, or has been "attacked", it is me.

There is no attack in that statement. Can you please just look at the facts of the case instead of looking for some reason to avoid doing so?

Thank you. Toug ma Tojer (talk) 13:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Where is the personal attack? I have just stated the facts of the events. If there is anyone that ought to be offended, or has been "attacked", it is me. There is no attack in that statement. Can you please just look at the facts of the case instead of looking for some reason to avoid doing so? Thank you. [[User:Toug ma Tojer|Toug ma Tojer]] ([[User talk:Toug ma Tojer#top|talk]]) 13:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Where is the personal attack? I have just stated the facts of the events. If there is anyone that ought to be offended, or has been "attacked", it is me. There is no attack in that statement. Can you please just look at the facts of the case instead of looking for some reason to avoid doing so? Thank you. [[User:Toug ma Tojer|Toug ma Tojer]] ([[User talk:Toug ma Tojer#top|talk]]) 13:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Where is the personal attack? I have just stated the facts of the events. If there is anyone that ought to be offended, or has been "attacked", it is me. There is no attack in that statement. Can you please just look at the facts of the case instead of looking for some reason to avoid doing so? Thank you. [[User:Toug ma Tojer|Toug ma Tojer]] ([[User talk:Toug ma Tojer#top|talk]]) 13:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}