User talk:Toug ma Tojer

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You force me to start a new account and then when I do, you accuse me of "sockpuppeting". Does that sound right to you?

I would like one account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all.

To continue editing, I made this new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some one then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=You force me to start a new account and then when I do, you accuse me of "sockpuppeting". Does that sound right to you? I would like one account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all. To continue editing, I made this new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some one then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=You force me to start a new account and then when I do, you accuse me of "sockpuppeting". Does that sound right to you? I would like one account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all. To continue editing, I made this new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some one then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=You force me to start a new account and then when I do, you accuse me of "sockpuppeting". Does that sound right to you? I would like one account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all. To continue editing, I made this new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some one then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

After just three edits across a variety of subjects, it is impossible for Sandstein to assert that I only wish to pursue "British Isles" related conflicts. Not only is the choice of the word "conflict" display prejudice. If that is the REAL reason you guys are blocking, you are blocking me because you don't like a valid point of view.

Therefore, let's scotch this "sockpuppet" crap for once and for all and remove it. I did NOT sockpuppet. YOU PEOPLE forced me to register a new account. It was not MY choice. Therefore it is a little paradoxical for you to them accuse me of having multiple accounts.

Simple, just unblock one. I will be perfectly happy. Blocking because you do not like someone's point of view is against the rules as I read them. Toug ma Tojer (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Editing

Additional point, how can I defend my self hier if I cannot edit it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Toug_ma_Tojer Toug ma Tojer (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Just for information, and without prejudice to the issue, on which I make no comment, the "child" who blocked the Sven account is a senior admin in wikipedia. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Furthermore, also purely for openness, let us note that the English slang word "todger", which is not dissimilar from the word in your username, is slang in Anglo-American fo "penis", and "toug" is fairly similar to "tug". But you probably knew that. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

We tend to see in life what we want to see. It is called "confirmational bias" Anthony. Toug ma Tojer (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)