User talk:Copperchair: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mv msg to proper subheading |
Copperchair (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{welcome}} -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] | [[User talk:Longhair|Talk]] 09:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
'''Archives''': |
|||
{| border="1" |
|||
|[[User:Copperchair/Archive1]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[User:Copperchair/Archive2]] |
|||
|} |
|||
---- |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair]] == |
|||
Hi, and welcome for real this time. I see you're into Star Wars in some way. In that case you might wish to look over the many [[:Category:Star Wars stubs|Star wars stub articles]] needing expansion. There's plenty there, and plenty more arrive all the time. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them on my talk page. Welcome once again. I trust you enjoy your stay. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] | [[User talk:Longhair|Talk]] 09:44, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
This arbitration case has closed. You are banned indefinitely from editing [[Star Wars]] and [[War on Terrorism]]. You are on indefinite [[Wikipedia:Probation]]. These provisions are to be enforced, should you break them, by blocks. The full details are in the decision (linked above). You may appeal this to the Committee or to [[User:Jimbo Wales]], who has the power of veto over remedies and enforcement. |
|||
For the arbitration committee. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 04:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Archive == |
|||
Copperchair, I shall humbly respect your blanking of your talkpage from here on out, and have decided that reverting you is really no laudible cause for complaint on my part. Its your talkpage, and you're entitled to its process. However, i believe that blanking is a clear oppositon to the comments regarding other editor's concerns, and I think it'd be sensible for you to respect that as well. In conclusion, I've simply made you another archive. I hope you agree with its insertion, and we can come to an agreement. Of course, you are free to revert, and I will accept your decision. I wish you the best. -[[User:MegamanZero|Zero]]<sup>[[User talk:MegamanZero|Talk]]</sup> 05:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== 24 hour block for violation of ArbCom ruling == |
|||
For violating your ArbCom ruling, I have blocked you for 24 hours. Details available [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Copperchair#Documentation_of_bans|here]]. — '''[[User:Philwelch|Phil]]''' ''[[User_talk:Philwelch|Welch]]'' 22:33, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Do you understand English? == |
|||
It's becoming more and more clear to me that it's quite possible that you don't. You edit-war and are chastised for it, but you insist you're in the right and continue. A number of editors bring you up on an RfC, which is overwhelmingly against your behaviour, but you insist you're in the right and continue. Your case then becomes an RfAr, in which the ArbCom votes 8-0 that ''you are banned indefinitely from editing anything related to Star Wars'', but apparently, you believe you're in the right and continue. You are then blocked for violating this ban, and what do you do when the block expires? You '''immediately''' restore your previous edit, exactly as before. |
|||
All this, to say nothing of your continued "sanitation" of your Talk page. It is becoming readily apparent that your efforts on the Internet would be better focused elsewhere. Please give some serious thought to leaving Wikipedia, before you are forced out without a choice as a result of your continued disruption.--'''[[User:Clawson|chris.]][[User talk:Clawson|lawson]]''' 13:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Maru and I have blocked you again. I won't ask you to leave, but I will ask you to think about what you're doing here and whether it's really for the good of the project—or, in fact, whether it'll accomplish *anything*. —'''[[User:Philwelch|Phil]]''' ''[[User_talk:Philwelch|Welch]]'' 22:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
=== Year blocking === |
|||
By the power vested in me as an administrator and by your probation, and because of your continued (6!) violations of the Arbcom ruling that on your fifth edit (this recent one was your sixth: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars:_Episode_VI_Return_of_the_Jedi&diff=prev&oldid=43409971]) to a ''Star Wars'' article, you would be blocked for a year. Well, we forebore, and only blocked for a week on #5, but you had to go and edit again. Don't bother continuing blanking this talk page; we'll simply semiprotect and indef block any sock puppets. --[[User:Marudubshinki |maru]] [[User talk:Marudubshinki|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Marudubshinki |contribs]] 17:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
=== Block === |
|||
You have been blocked for 366 days for violating the agreements that were recently made relating to Star Wars pages. --[[User:Deckiller|Deckiller]] 21:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Just protect this already == |
|||
I am sure the restore I'm doing right now makes well over 100 restorations, by various individuals, of Copperchair's contemtuous and contemptible blanking of this page. It's obvious Copperchair has no intention of listening to anyone on any subject whatsoever, or contributing to this project in any way that can remotely be construed as constructive or collaborative. People have been banned for six months or longer for less, with a lot more substantive good edits to their credit. '''Just hard-ban Copperchair and lock this page already.''' There hasn't been any point in doing anything else with this individual for a long, long time. [[User:PurplePlatypus|PurplePlatypus]] 03:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Amen. [[User:The Wookieepedian|The Wookieepedian]] 03:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I see little reason to hurry. He has one ban left, and then he's banned for a year, which with autoblocks and such usually ends the issue. --[[User:Marudubshinki|maru]] [[User talk:Marudubshinki|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Marudubshinki|contribs]] 03:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Actually I'd like an explanation for why this page was being reverted and why it is protected. User's have the right to edit their talk pages and blank them if they like. They can't remove vandalism warnings, etc, but everything else is fair game. I'm unprotecting unless some really good policy points are brought up that I'm missing. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Taxman|Talk]]</small></sup> 21:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Archiving is one thing. Reverting it back to the stone age to give the appearance of a clueless newbie is another, but what the hell let's see what happens. — <small>Mar. 7, '06</small> <tt class=plainlinks>'''[21:20] <[[user:freakofnurture/ |freakof]][[special:newpages |nu]][[WP:EA |r<sub>x</sub>]][[special:random |ture]][[special:ipblocklist ||]]<font color=002BB8>[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit§ion=new}} talk]</font>>'''</tt> |
|||
:::The above is ''precisely'' why this keeps being reverted. Copperchair is blanking his talk page to sanitise it and make it appear he is completely innocent. The ArbCom warning needs to stay there, along with associated warnings for behaviour, as long as the behaviour remains unresolved. There is ample precedent for this, and I've been saying this for something going on eight months now.--'''[[User:Clawson|chris.]][[User talk:Clawson|lawson]]''' 23:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, the rest of it doesn't matter, including this conversation, but you can't blank or remove the arbcom warning, per the blocking policy. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Taxman|Talk]]</small></sup> 13:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Blocked again == |
|||
Hi, I don't really have any connection with this issue, but it's fairly obvious you're just purposely violating your arbcom ban. Please just stick to articles you're not banned from and we'll all be happier. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Taxman|Talk]]</small></sup> 05:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Image Tagging for [[:Image:Greedoshootsfirst.jpg]]== |
|||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Greedoshootsfirst.jpg]]'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. |
|||
For more information on using images, see the following pages: |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Image use policy]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] |
|||
This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[User talk:Carnildo/images]]. 19:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Image Tagging [[:Image:Anakinunmasked.jpg]]== |
|||
{| align="CENTER" style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border:8px solid #FF0000; padding:5px;" |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|Warning sign]] |
|||
| <center><big>This media may be '''deleted'''.</big> |
|||
</center> |
|||
|} |
|||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Anakinunmasked.jpg]]'''. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the [[copyright]] status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. |
|||
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{tl|GFDL-self}} to release it under the [[GFDL]]. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]], and then use a tag such as {{tlp|fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use]]. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. |
|||
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. [[User:Dethomas|Dethomas]] 22:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:19, 13 March 2006
Welcome!
Hi Copperchair! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! -- Longhair | Talk 09:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome for real this time. I see you're into Star Wars in some way. In that case you might wish to look over the many Star wars stub articles needing expansion. There's plenty there, and plenty more arrive all the time. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them on my talk page. Welcome once again. I trust you enjoy your stay. -- Longhair | Talk 09:44, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)