Talk:5G: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Article needs a lot of clean up: new section |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
In 13 June a [[template:dated prod|deletion proposal template]] was added to the article, with the motivation "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, citation needed." The article may be deleted if the message remains in place for seven days. What is your vote? |
In 13 June a [[template:dated prod|deletion proposal template]] was added to the article, with the motivation "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, citation needed." The article may be deleted if the message remains in place for seven days. What is your vote? |
||
* '''Keep''' the article. Since the prod template, five published sources have been added to the article. A search in [http://scholar.google.se/scholar?hl=sv&q=%22fifth+generation%22+5g+wireless&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Google scholar] and [http://www.google.com/search?hl=sv&tbo=1&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22fifth+generation%22+5g+wireless&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= Google books] shows more scientific publications on the topic exist. However, the article should be improved by footnotes, from those sources as well as from published news magazines. I don't have time to fix that. [[User:Mange01|Mange01]] ([[User talk:Mange01|talk]]) 17:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' the article. Since the prod template, five published sources have been added to the article. A search in [http://scholar.google.se/scholar?hl=sv&q=%22fifth+generation%22+5g+wireless&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Google scholar] and [http://www.google.com/search?hl=sv&tbo=1&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22fifth+generation%22+5g+wireless&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= Google books] shows more scientific publications on the topic exist. However, the article should be improved by footnotes, from those sources as well as from published news magazines. I don't have time to fix that. [[User:Mange01|Mange01]] ([[User talk:Mange01|talk]]) 17:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' the article. Where did the template go? This article is pure speculation, and just because a very few papers refer speculatively to what might be after 4G and call it 5G, doesn't mean we should have an encyclopedic article. Perhaps a short section on 4G deficiencies would be warranted ''in the 4G article''. It is utterly ridiculous to have a 5G article when the marketing departments of the mobile providers are still arguing with the ITU what is 4G. If the former win, it is possible that LTE/HSPA+/802.16e will be designated as 4G by the ITU and LTEA/802.16m will be the 5G. This article wild speculation and original research, and should be tagged as such as well as tagged for deletion. [[User:Jpgs|Jpgs]] ([[User talk:Jpgs|talk]]) 22:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Incomprehensible reference of "5G the Nanocore" paper removed == |
== Incomprehensible reference of "5G the Nanocore" paper removed == |
Revision as of 22:36, 28 June 2011
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Telecommunications Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Computing: Networking Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Deletion of the article?
In 13 June a deletion proposal template was added to the article, with the motivation "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, citation needed." The article may be deleted if the message remains in place for seven days. What is your vote?
- Keep the article. Since the prod template, five published sources have been added to the article. A search in Google scholar and Google books shows more scientific publications on the topic exist. However, the article should be improved by footnotes, from those sources as well as from published news magazines. I don't have time to fix that. Mange01 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete the article. Where did the template go? This article is pure speculation, and just because a very few papers refer speculatively to what might be after 4G and call it 5G, doesn't mean we should have an encyclopedic article. Perhaps a short section on 4G deficiencies would be warranted in the 4G article. It is utterly ridiculous to have a 5G article when the marketing departments of the mobile providers are still arguing with the ITU what is 4G. If the former win, it is possible that LTE/HSPA+/802.16e will be designated as 4G by the ITU and LTEA/802.16m will be the 5G. This article wild speculation and original research, and should be tagged as such as well as tagged for deletion. Jpgs (talk) 22:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Incomprehensible reference of "5G the Nanocore" paper removed
I deleted the following text:
- "5G The NanoCore:The incorporated technologies are. 1. Nanotechnology.2. Cloud Computing.3. All IP Network.4. Flat IP Architecture.Explain how Nanotechnology & Cloud computing can work collectively to figure a single entity the NanoCore."
Reasons:
- The cited article is not a peer-reviewed research paper, and does not provide citations or calculations as support of the suggested technologies. Wikipedia is not the place for original research.
- The last sentence is incomprehensible.
- All-IP is already provided by 4G.
- After reading the cited article, I still don't understand the connection between 5G and nanotechnology, or between 5G and cloud computing.
A few weeks ago the same user added duplicated and incomprehensible citation of the same source, trying to promote his "Nanocore" concept, coined by himself. Mange01 (talk) 14:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Reverse copy-violation
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
The 5G section of that article quotes the 18 June 2010 version of this Wikipedia article.
Article needs a lot of clean up
The article starts off with some garbage, and is vague in the rest.
Categories:
- Start-Class Telecommunications articles
- High-importance Telecommunications articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class Computer networking articles
- Unknown-importance Computer networking articles
- Start-Class Computer networking articles of Unknown-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles