Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurse Ratched: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
strong keep |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[WP:PLOT]]; character biography presents no additional plot/fictional biography information or criteria proving notability that isn't already covered in the plot sections of [[One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (novel)]] or [[One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (film)]]. <b><span style="background-color:#C9CAC8;color:#0083A9;">Sottolacqua</span></b><small> ([[user talk:sottolacqua|talk]])</small> 13:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
[[WP:PLOT]]; character biography presents no additional plot/fictional biography information or criteria proving notability that isn't already covered in the plot sections of [[One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (novel)]] or [[One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (film)]]. <b><span style="background-color:#C9CAC8;color:#0083A9;">Sottolacqua</span></b><small> ([[user talk:sottolacqua|talk]])</small> 13:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:'''Strong Keep'''. Not only has the character spawned significant critical commentary with regard to the novel, the play, and the movie, but she has become a common metaphorical figure in artistic, social and political discussion. Here's just a sample of Gnews cites from 2010 which refer to the character without mentioning the underlying work. [http://www.mlive.com/movies/index.ssf/2010/09/you_again_is_obnoxious_movie_w.html] [http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/matthew-norman-theres-a-charming-symmetry-to-the-latest-new-labour-scandal-14737941.html] [http://mainlinemedianews.com/articles/2010/08/10/main_line_suburban_life/opinion/doc4c61aaf322a8a822324361.txt] [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/books/news/article.cfm?c_id=134&objectid=10681875] [http://thestir.cafemom.com/pregnancy/101854/my_birth_story_8_days][http://www.citytowninfo.com/career-and-education-news/articles/12-great-caring-careers-10030103]. Article could certainly use expansion in terms of the available critical commentary, but that's certainly not a reason to delete. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 15:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
:'''Strong Keep'''. Not only has the character spawned significant critical commentary with regard to the novel, the play, and the movie, but she has become a common metaphorical figure in artistic, social and political discussion. Here's just a sample of Gnews cites from 2010 which refer to the character without mentioning the underlying work. [http://www.mlive.com/movies/index.ssf/2010/09/you_again_is_obnoxious_movie_w.html] [http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/matthew-norman-theres-a-charming-symmetry-to-the-latest-new-labour-scandal-14737941.html] [http://mainlinemedianews.com/articles/2010/08/10/main_line_suburban_life/opinion/doc4c61aaf322a8a822324361.txt] [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/books/news/article.cfm?c_id=134&objectid=10681875] [http://thestir.cafemom.com/pregnancy/101854/my_birth_story_8_days][http://www.citytowninfo.com/career-and-education-news/articles/12-great-caring-careers-10030103]. Article could certainly use expansion in terms of the available critical commentary, but that's certainly not a reason to delete. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 15:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:'''Keep'''. Although, I believe the novel makes repeated reference to the character's bosom, which is described as quite large. Fortunately this was kept out of the film. Louise Lasser is a fine actress, but... you know... Anyway, so long as the article makes no mention of this aspect of her anatomy, I see no reason to delete. If this were an actual person, of course, that would be another matter. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 15:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:53, 19 July 2011
- Nurse Ratched (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AfDs related to this article:
WP:PLOT; character biography presents no additional plot/fictional biography information or criteria proving notability that isn't already covered in the plot sections of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (novel) or One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (film). Sottolacqua (talk) 13:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Not only has the character spawned significant critical commentary with regard to the novel, the play, and the movie, but she has become a common metaphorical figure in artistic, social and political discussion. Here's just a sample of Gnews cites from 2010 which refer to the character without mentioning the underlying work. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5][6]. Article could certainly use expansion in terms of the available critical commentary, but that's certainly not a reason to delete. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Although, I believe the novel makes repeated reference to the character's bosom, which is described as quite large. Fortunately this was kept out of the film. Louise Lasser is a fine actress, but... you know... Anyway, so long as the article makes no mention of this aspect of her anatomy, I see no reason to delete. If this were an actual person, of course, that would be another matter. Dekkappai (talk) 15:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)