Jump to content

User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:C.Fred/Archive 9.
trina!: new section
Line 62: Line 62:
::C.Fred, I have already explained this to the user in a more constructive way on his/her talk page. But please check whether it ''is'' more constructive.[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 04:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
::C.Fred, I have already explained this to the user in a more constructive way on his/her talk page. But please check whether it ''is'' more constructive.[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 04:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
:::Jasper, I agree that the explanation you gave at the IP's talk page was more constructive. I was condensing the content here to note that I've looked at the issue. Sorry if my comments came across as cranky or anything. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
:::Jasper, I agree that the explanation you gave at the IP's talk page was more constructive. I was condensing the content here to note that I've looked at the issue. Sorry if my comments came across as cranky or anything. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

== trina! ==

Yes I have new information about trina,and i would love for you to add it.

http://hiphopwired.com/2011/07/14/trina-joins-%E2%80%9Cno-h8%E2%80%9D-campaign-photos/

http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/94340/ [[Special:Contributions/74.190.22.214|74.190.22.214]] ([[User talk:74.190.22.214|talk]]) 20:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:06, 20 July 2011



Morley Academy

Thanks for your interest in the Morley Academy entry. We have tried to improve its accuracy by linking to well recognised information on our website. The previous section on Headteacher controversy was fairly malicious and had no reference other than to anonymous posts in a discussion thread. Not very credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSATPolicy (talkcontribs) 15:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've admitted a conflict of interest, I remind you again to edit very carefully with regard to the subject. Also, another editor has objected to your edits, so I suggest you discuss the situation at the article's talk page. I'll recheck the sources, but if you mention at Talk:The Morley Academy which sources are based on discussion threads, I (and other editors) will be sure to focus on those. —C.Fred (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Hoban

Thank you for restoring the Jack Hoban page. Mtpublicaffairs (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already added an example of how the episodes should look like in the main total drama article. But the biggest and most controversial change that needs to happen is removing the elimination table as it makes the articles incredibly in-universe. So i was wondering if we can decide that.Bread Ninja (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your example and already started converting all the episode lists on all 4 season articles, based upon your example. Also those elimination tables were supposed to be removed a long time ago since they are mostly trivial. Giggett (talk) 02:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know we are understanding now.Bread Ninja (talk) 02:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello, possible request. Is it possible to develop an article Corbin Bleu and become a good article See the article Arabic Wikipedia good article, can you?--77.31.36.7 (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this version will help you to become a good article look--77.31.36.7 (talk) 15:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if this comment should be deleted. It's an attempt (albeit circuitous) to out the editor who made the preceding comment. Voceditenore (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had a feeling there was something less-than-kosher about it, but a didn't want to dive in and strike it from AN/I without some background. I'm going to delete it. —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

red bottoms

trina red bottoms number 100 on the r&b/hip-hop chart,and i don't see why you keep reverting the page.

http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/trina/252957

98.88.209.190 (talk) 04:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because indefinitely-blocked users, as it's pretty clear you are, do not have the privilege to edit Wikipedia. As a result, your edits are reverted on sight and will continue to be until you have your main account unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 04:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
C.Fred, I have already explained this to the user in a more constructive way on his/her talk page. But please check whether it is more constructive.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jasper, I agree that the explanation you gave at the IP's talk page was more constructive. I was condensing the content here to note that I've looked at the issue. Sorry if my comments came across as cranky or anything. —C.Fred (talk) 04:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

trina!

Yes I have new information about trina,and i would love for you to add it.

http://hiphopwired.com/2011/07/14/trina-joins-%E2%80%9Cno-h8%E2%80%9D-campaign-photos/

http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/94340/ 74.190.22.214 (talk) 20:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]