User talk:TParis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:06, 28 July 2011

This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

X-Micro

This page was an unfinished project, which I started yesterday and was going to continue today. The purpose was to provide information about X-Micro in a concise manner, not to advertise anything. Just to provide information of a medium-sized Taiwanese company, which is also a relatively known brand - though more so some years ago than now. Sourcing this information from the internet is an on-going process. How could the page be rewritten in a way that fits your criteria? And how can it even be deleted even before I was able to react? Val — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taipeitech (talk • contribs) 05:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article as written used X-Micro as the only citation and is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. There was no assertion of notability or even significance. There was also a lot of use of peacock words such as "an emphasis", "soon expanded", "currently entails", and "wide product range". If you can show me two third party source with significant coverage about this company and explain it's importance and promise to write in a neutral manner, I'll restore the article to your userspace.--v/r - T P 12:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ok. I´ll do some more research on the topic and then prepare writing that is closer to the end result. The stuff I wrote earlier was my first wikipedia page, so really only a first draft. My source related research was also very much unfinished. I´ll get back to you later on! Val

Thanks for the Kind Words on my RFA

Thanks for the word to the wise -- the process was actually quite enlightening! I learned a lot from all the comments and will keep in mind how much more there is to Wikipedia. ch (talk) 05:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly

	Thank you for your support
	Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Maybe, you saw wrong, I were blocked on 27 June 2010, that's not that recent. Alex^discussion 13:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I stroked it out. I did read it wrong.--v/r - T P 13:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But, what will be with my request: assigned or denied? Alex^discussion 13:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it for another admin. I dont have enough experience to judge this case.--v/r - T P 14:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alimander requesting unblock

Please see User talk:Alimander. Since you're the blocking admin, please take a look at his latest unblock request and see if you think it is sufficient. He is asking for his name to be changed and promising not to add any more links to his site. EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 This page was an unfinished project, which I started yesterday and was going to continue today. The purpose was to provide information about X-Micro in a concise manner, not to advertise anything. Just to provide information of a medium-sized Taiwanese company, which is also a relatively known brand - though more so some years ago than now. Sourcing this information from the internet is an on-going process. How could the page be rewritten in a way that fits your criteria? And how can it even be deleted even before I was able to react? Val  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Taipeitech|Taipeitech]] ([[User talk:Taipeitech|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Taipeitech|contribs]]) 05:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :The article as written used X-Micro as the only citation and is a [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCE]].  There was no assertion of [[WP:N|notability]] or even significance.  There was also a lot of use of peacock words such as "an emphasis", "soon expanded", "currently entails", and "wide product range".  If you can show me two [[WP:RS|third party source]] with [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] about this company and explain it's importance and promise to write in a [[WP:NPOV|neutral manner]], I'll restore the article to your userspace.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 12:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
+Hello, Ok. I´ll do some more research on the topic and then prepare writing that is closer to the end result. The stuff I wrote earlier was my first wikipedia page, so really only a first draft. My source related research was also very much unfinished. I´ll get back to you later on! Val
 == Thanks for the Kind Words on my RFA ==