User talk:83.252.62.192: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:34, 31 July 2011

Welcome

Greetings...

Hello, 83.252.62.192, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the green welcome.

I hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Epeefleche

Happy editing! Epeefleche (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a welcome screen that may be more helpful:

Welcome

Hello, 83.252.62.192! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Epeefleche (talk) 09:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2010

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Arbitrary arrest and detention, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Epeefleche (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda link allegations ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
 [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did to [[:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im -->
-== May 2010 ==
-[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''final warning''' you will receive regarding your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]].  The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Eugenics Record Office]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> [[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 00:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
-:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
-:You didn't supply any footnotes (references) to support that statement.  Do you have any?  [http://books.google.com/books?id=h0QCIfcFYx8C&pg=PT99&dq=%22Eugenics+Record+Office%22+-%22rockefeller%22+funded+harriman+carnegie&hl=en&ei=l7vrS_fqKMH68AaH4NzBCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Eugenics%20Record%20Office%22%20-%22rockefeller%22%20funded%20harriman%20carnegie&f=false This] says Harriman funded it entirely, and then Carnegie.  You tossed in Rockefeller, without a footnote.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 08:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
-::You can add it.  I would note the discrepancy between the sources, though, as I've added a source that says something different than what you appear to have.  Also, is it what we call a "[[wp:reliable source]]"?--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 08:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
-Here is some information
-http://studentorgs.umf.maine.edu/~aio/historian/vol2iss2/rockefeller_article.pdf
-http://www.scribd.com/doc/11937049/The-Rockefeller-Plan
-http://gateskeepers.civiblog.org/blog/_archives/2008/1/30/3471544.html
-http://gateskeepers.civiblog.org/blog/_archives/2008/1/30/3471544.html
-http://www.eugenics-watch.com/eugbook/euod_ch1.html
-http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1646152561.html
-http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/294/5540/59
-I'll work with you on this, because I sense that you are new, and are trying, so I'll help you along here for a couple of minutes, and teach you a couple of editing skills you can use on wikipedia.
-First, you will see that even though you listed the urls above along the left margin, when you saved them they didn't stay that way.  The way to handle that is to put a colon before each of them.
-Second, once you've done that, look at what each of them say.  I looked at only one -- the highbeam.  While it said that Rockefeller supported the movement in general, it didn't stand for the proposition that you used it for in the article, which was more specific.  At least not clearly.
-Third, you will have to look at the reliable source guideline I indicated above.  Take a look, and let me know if you think all of these are "RSs".  For example, read what it says about blogs, and measure these blogs against that requirement. I may not be able to respond to you completely tonight, because this may take  little while.  When you have looked through them, leave me a note on this page as to which if any you think squarely support what you have said in the article, and I will take a look.  Best.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 09:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
-Haha those links are fine I even supplied a university report, and if you read them its evident Rockefeller had a impact on this organization, you know what, Im not going to argue with you anymore because I dont got the power to do edits since you will ban me no matter what. You see, maybe you are new, but Wikipedia is not about to necessary add things with sources and the whole shebang, its a collaboration, like you didnt have to remove my add to it, you could just add "source needed" etc. The majority of information stated in one general Wiki-artical doesnt have sources supplied, its very simple, just look it up. The fact that you have me under some supervision or even surveillance makes me even more suspicious of your intent regarding me as user or even as  a person.
-http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html